Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s k talsania · Page 1 of about 69 results (0.045 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 10 2006

General Secretary, Best Worker's Union Vs. General Manager, Best Under ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-10-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Bombay Industrial Relations Act - Sections 78(1)(D), 101; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307, 320 and 324; Prevention of Curruption Act

Reported in : 2007(3)BomCR497; (2006)IIILLJ924Bom; 2006(44)MhLj32

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Talsania, Sr. Counsel and Rita N. Vora, Adv., i/b., Crowford Bayley and Co. for Respondent No. 1

Anoop V. Mohta, J.1. The petitioner being a General Secretary, was an active Union member and an office bearer of the BEST Workers Union. He therefore, claimed to be a protected employee under Section 101 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 22 2005

Sarva Shramik Sangh and ors. Vs. Kamala Mills and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-22-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946; ;Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985; ;Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33C(2)

Reported in : 2006(3)ALLMR176; 2006(5)BomCR861; [2006(109)FLR792]; (2006)IILLJ468Bom; 2006(2)MhLj690

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Talsania, Sr. Counsel i/b., Kanga and Co. for respondent No. 1

R.M. Lodha, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 7th April, 1997 whereby the learned Single Judge rejected the writ petition in limine.2. The controversy arises, in the circumstances, which we briefly advert...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 18 2006

Maharashtra General Kamgar Mahasangh Vs. Mistry Prabhudas Manaji Engin ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-18-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 26 to 29, 30, 48 and 50; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 33C and 33C(2); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR555; 2007(3)BomCR856

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Talsania and ;Pankaj Kansara, Advs., i/b., ;K. Kharawala, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2

Karnik D.G., J.1. This petition raises an interesting question of law viz. Whether the interim order passed under Section 30 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 26 2016

M/s. Rohini S. Kurghode and Others Vs. M/s. E. Merck (I) Limited and A ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-26-2016

Subject : Labour and Industrial

1. The writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is invoked against the judgment and order dated 23.12.1999 passed by the Learned Member of the Industrial Court, Thane, by which,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 2005

Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. I.K. Bhagwagar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-01-2005

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : II(2007)ACC427; 2006(3)ALLMR265

Nishita Mhatre, J.1. The appeal has been filed against the judgment and order of learned Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation in Application (W.C.A.) No. 30/C-6 of 1988. By this order, the Commissioner has awarded Rs. 99,280 towards...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 04 1996

Yeshwant Redkar Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-04-1996

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27, 33 and 60; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120-B, 411, 413 and 414; Indian Police Act, 1949 - Sections 46; Uttar Pradesh Disciplinary Proceedings (Administrative Tribunal) Rules, 1947

Reported in : 1998(1)ALLMR656; 1998(3)BomCR743; 1997(3)MhLj357

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Talsania, Adv. i/b Pardiwala & Co. and ;R.C. Master, Adv.

ORDERA.P. Shah, J. 1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution takes exception to the order dated 7th April, 1992 passed by the disciplinary authority dismissing the petitioner from service as well as the order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 2001

Padmini R. Bijoor and ors. Vs. Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-02-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 135(1)

Reported in : 2002(2)BomCR321; (2002)IIILLJ891Bom

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Talsania and ;S.U. Uttam, Advs. i/b., Mulla & Mulla Craigle Blunt & Caroe for Respondent No. 1 and ;R.C. Master and ;H.V. Mehta, Adv. for Respondent No. 2

H.L. Gokhale, J. 1. This petition has been filed by one Capt. R.M. Bijoor, the original petitioner, to challenge the order dated December 17, 1986 passed by respondent No. 1 dismissing him from their services. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 2002

General Labour Union and anr. Vs. Arjandas Metal Industries Pvt. Ltd. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-22-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service Regulation Act, 1977

Reported in : (2002)IIILLJ489Bom

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Talsania, Adv. i/b., ;R.V. Paranjape, Adv.

J.A. Patil, J.1. The petitioners have filed this petition, alleging that the respondents have wilfully disobeyed the order dated April 18, 2000 passed by this Court in W.P.No. 610/2000 and thereby committed contempt of the Court....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2006

Bajaj Auto Limited Vs. Shri Shrikant Vinayak Yogi and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-13-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 28(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2006(4)ALLMR181; 2006(4)BomCR197; 2006(3)MhLj557

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Talsania, Sr. Counsel and ;S.R. Nargolkar, Adv. for respondent Nos. 1, 13, 41 and 43

V.C. Daga, J. 1. Rule, returnable forthwith by consent of parties. Heard rival parties. Perused petition and documents annexed thereto. 2. This petition is directed against the interim order dated 23rd December, 2005 passed below Exh.U-2...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 2001

Wasudeo Ganesh Altekar Vs. Punjab National Bank and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-10-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Punjab National Bank Officer Employees (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1977 - Regulations 4, 6, 6(1) and 8(2)

Reported in : 2002(2)MhLj695

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Talsania, Adv., i/b., Talsania & Co.

S.J. Vazifdar, J. 1. The petitioner was an employee of Respondent No. 1. Respondent No. 2 is a trustee of Punjab National Bank Employees Provident Fund.2. The previous orders of various Benches of this Court, make...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial