Advanced Search Results
General Secretary, Best Worker's Union Vs. General Manager, Best Under ...
Mumbai
Mar-10-2006
Service
Bombay Industrial Relations Act - Sections 78(1)(D), 101; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307, 320 and 324; Prevention of Curruption Act
2007(3)BomCR497; (2006)IIILLJ924Bom; 2006(44)MhLj32
S.K. Talsania, Sr. Counsel and Rita N. Vora, Adv., i/b., Crowford Bayley and Co. for Respondent No. 1
Anoop V. Mohta, J.1. The petitioner being a General Secretary, was an active Union member and an office bearer of the BEST Workers Union. He therefore, claimed to be a protected employee under Section 101 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSarva Shramik Sangh and ors. Vs. Kamala Mills and anr.
Mumbai
Dec-22-2005
Labour and Industrial
Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946; ;Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985; ;Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33C(2)
2006(3)ALLMR176; 2006(5)BomCR861; [2006(109)FLR792]; (2006)IILLJ468Bom; 2006(2)MhLj690
S.K. Talsania, Sr. Counsel i/b., Kanga and Co. for respondent No. 1
R.M. Lodha, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 7th April, 1997 whereby the learned Single Judge rejected the writ petition in limine.2. The controversy arises, in the circumstances, which we briefly advert...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaharashtra General Kamgar Mahasangh Vs. Mistry Prabhudas Manaji Engin ...
Mumbai
Jul-18-2006
Labour and Industrial
Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 26 to 29, 30, 48 and 50; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 33C and 33C(2); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
2006(6)ALLMR555; 2007(3)BomCR856
S.K. Talsania and ;Pankaj Kansara, Advs., i/b., ;K. Kharawala, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2
Karnik D.G., J.1. This petition raises an interesting question of law viz. Whether the interim order passed under Section 30 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
M/s. Rohini S. Kurghode and Others Vs. M/s. E. Merck (I) Limited and A ...
Mumbai
Oct-26-2016
Labour and Industrial
1. The writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is invoked against the judgment and order dated 23.12.1999 passed by the Learned Member of the Industrial Court, Thane, by which,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShipping Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. I.K. Bhagwagar
Mumbai
Sep-01-2005
InsuranceMotor Vehicles
II(2007)ACC427; 2006(3)ALLMR265
Nishita Mhatre, J.1. The appeal has been filed against the judgment and order of learned Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation in Application (W.C.A.) No. 30/C-6 of 1988. By this order, the Commissioner has awarded Rs. 99,280 towards...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskYeshwant Redkar Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation and Another
Mumbai
Sep-04-1996
ServiceCivil
Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27, 33 and 60; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120-B, 411, 413 and 414; Indian Police Act, 1949 - Sections 46; Uttar Pradesh Disciplinary Proceedings (Administrative Tribunal) Rules, 1947
1998(1)ALLMR656; 1998(3)BomCR743; 1997(3)MhLj357
S.K. Talsania, Adv. i/b Pardiwala & Co. and ;R.C. Master, Adv.
ORDERA.P. Shah, J. 1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution takes exception to the order dated 7th April, 1992 passed by the disciplinary authority dismissing the petitioner from service as well as the order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPadmini R. Bijoor and ors. Vs. Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. and ...
Mumbai
Jul-02-2001
Labour and Industrial
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 135(1)
2002(2)BomCR321; (2002)IIILLJ891Bom
S.K. Talsania and ;S.U. Uttam, Advs. i/b., Mulla & Mulla Craigle Blunt & Caroe for Respondent No. 1 and ;R.C. Master and ;H.V. Mehta, Adv. for Respondent No. 2
H.L. Gokhale, J. 1. This petition has been filed by one Capt. R.M. Bijoor, the original petitioner, to challenge the order dated December 17, 1986 passed by respondent No. 1 dismissing him from their services. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGeneral Labour Union and anr. Vs. Arjandas Metal Industries Pvt. Ltd. ...
Mumbai
Feb-22-2002
Labour and Industrial
Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service Regulation Act, 1977
(2002)IIILLJ489Bom
S.K. Talsania, Adv. i/b., ;R.V. Paranjape, Adv.
J.A. Patil, J.1. The petitioners have filed this petition, alleging that the respondents have wilfully disobeyed the order dated April 18, 2000 passed by this Court in W.P.No. 610/2000 and thereby committed contempt of the Court....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBajaj Auto Limited Vs. Shri Shrikant Vinayak Yogi and ors.
Mumbai
Apr-13-2006
Labour and Industrial
Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 28(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
2006(4)ALLMR181; 2006(4)BomCR197; 2006(3)MhLj557
S.K. Talsania, Sr. Counsel and ;S.R. Nargolkar, Adv. for respondent Nos. 1, 13, 41 and 43
V.C. Daga, J. 1. Rule, returnable forthwith by consent of parties. Heard rival parties. Perused petition and documents annexed thereto. 2. This petition is directed against the interim order dated 23rd December, 2005 passed below Exh.U-2...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWasudeo Ganesh Altekar Vs. Punjab National Bank and anr.
Mumbai
Sep-10-2001
Service
Punjab National Bank Officer Employees (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1977 - Regulations 4, 6, 6(1) and 8(2)
2002(2)MhLj695
S.K. Talsania, Adv., i/b., Talsania & Co.
S.J. Vazifdar, J. 1. The petitioner was an employee of Respondent No. 1. Respondent No. 2 is a trustee of Punjab National Bank Employees Provident Fund.2. The previous orders of various Benches of this Court, make...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »