Skip to content
Try for free

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s k seth · Page 1 of about 502 results (0.086 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Mar 20 2002

Maharishi Mahesh Yogi Vedic Vishwavidyalaya and ors. Vs. State of M.P. ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-20-2002

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharishi Mahesh Yogi Vedic Viswavidyalaya Adhiniyam, 1995 - Sections 4, 9(2), 31-A(1), 31-A(2), 31-B, 31-C and 37-A; ;Maharishi Mahesh Yogi Vedic Viswavidyalaya (Sanshodhan) Adhiniyam, 2000; ;Constitution of India - Article 14; Madhya Pradesh Vishwavidyalaya Adhiniyam, 1973 - Sections 51 and 52

Reported in : AIR2002MP196; 2002(2)MPHT353

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Seth, Addl. Adv. General

Dipak Misra, J. 1. In this writ petition it is imperative to bestow our anxious consideration on the long debate and deliberation that took place consuming quite a speck of time relating to contentious issues which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Sep 26 2000

New India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Rfeeka Sultan and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-26-2000

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 96(1), 96(2), 96(3), 96(6), 110, 110(3), 110C, 110C(2A), 111A, 140, 147, 149, 149(1), 149(2), 165(1), 166, 166(2), 168, 168(1), 168(2), 168(3), 169, 170, 173, 173(1) and 173(2); Workmen's Compensation Act; Contempt of Courts Act; Madhya Pradesh Civil Courts Act - Sections 3; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 12 and 35; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 129, 129A and 129E; Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Motor Vehicles Rules - Rule 297; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 4, 25 and 115 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 21; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 306; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment

Reported in : 2000(4)MPHT288

Advocate for Respondent : Ravish Agrawal, Sr. Adv. and ;S.K. Seth, AAG as Amicus Curiae

ORDERBhawani Singh, C.J.1. Whether Insurance Company can challenge quantum of compensation under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure or under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is the question for determination in this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Jun 26 2002

Ram Dayal Prajapati Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-26-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 - Sections 37; Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation (Amendment) Act, 1998; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities (The Conduct of Business of the Mayor-in-Council/President-in-Council and the Powers and Functions of the Authorities) Rules, 1998 - Rule 3(2)

Reported in : AIR2003MP171

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Seth, Addl Adv. Gen and ;A.K. Mishra, Adv.

Dipak Misra, J.1.By this writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner, a Municipal Councillor of the Municipal Corporation, Bhopal has prayed for declaration of Rule 3(2) of Madhya Pradesh Municipalities...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Mar 11 2002

Kailash Narayan Rai and ors., Etc. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-11-2002

Subject : Motor VehiclesOther Taxes

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Motoryan Karadhan Adhiniyam, 1991 - Sections 23; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19(1)

Reported in : AIR2003MP74; 2003(1)MPLJ482

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Seth, Addl. Adv. General

ORDER1. The factual matrix and the grounds of law raised being common in this batch of writ petitions, it was heard analogously and is disposed of by this singular order. For the sake of clarity and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Apr 04 2001

Smt. Pallvika Patel Vs. State Election Commission and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-04-2001

Subject : ConstitutionElection

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 47, 47(1) and (2); Madhya Pradesh Municipalities (Amendment) Act, 1999; Constitution of India - Article 243-R and 243-R(2); Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 - Sections 21-A; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1960 - Sections 87-A

Reported in : AIR2001MP306; 2001(3)MPHT366; 2001(2)MPLJ470

Advocate for Respondent : Shri S.K. Seth, ;Addl. A.G., Shri R.S. Jha, ;Dy. A.G. and ;Shri V.S. Shroti, Adv.

ORDERBhawani Singh, C.J. 1. Smt. Pallvika Patel was elected President, Nagar Panchayat, Anooppur, District Shahdol in December, 1997. This Nagar Panchayat comprises of 15 elected members besides the petitioner, apart from nominated Members of House of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Apr 03 2002

Lakhan Lal Patel Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-03-2002

Subject : Election

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Nirvachan Niyam, 1995 - Rule 80; ;Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 - Sections 122

Reported in : 2002(3)MPHT519; 2002(3)MPLJ41

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Seth, Addl. Adv. General, ;Rajendra Tiwai and ;R.K. Verma, Advs.

ORDERAs per Rajendra Menon, J.1. This Letters Patent Appeal arises out of judgment dated 26-2-2001 passed in W.P. No. 1603/2001.2. Shri Ram Prakash Shrivastava, respondent No. 4 was declared elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Natwara,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Jan 14 2003

Manorama Borkar and ors. Vs. Janki Prasad and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-14-2003

Subject : Motor VehiclesCivil

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 304A

Reported in : 2004ACJ1456

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Seth, Addl. A.G.

Bhawani Singh, C.J.1. This appeal is directed against the award of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Balaghat in M.A.C. No. 77 of 1999 dated 19.1.2000.2. Briefly, Dr. Shyamlal Borkar was posted as Block Medical Officer, Primary Health...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Nov 08 2001

Mahinder Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-08-2001

Subject : Constitution

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3(2), 3(3), 3(4), 3(5), 5-A, 8, 10 and 11

Reported in : 2002(1)MPHT298; 2002(1)MPLJ544

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Seth, Addl. Adv. General

ORDERBhawani Singh, C J. 1. Mahinder Singh son of Prem Singh Patwa has been detained by District Magistrate, East Nimar (Khandwa) by order dated March 23, 2001 under Sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the National...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Aug 02 1995

Puneet Travels and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-02-1995

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Motoryan Karadhan (Vidhi Manyakaran) Adhiniyam, 1994; Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1947 - Sections 3A; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 226, 245, 246 and 265

Reported in : II(1998)ACC482; 1996(0)MPLJ318

Advocate for Respondent : Anoop Choudhary, Adv. General, ;V.K. Tankha, Adv. and ;S.K. Seth, Government Adv.

ORDER1. This order will also govern the disposal of Writ Petition No. 3112 of 1994, Sagar Motor Transport Company and Ors. v. State of M. P. and Anr.; Writ Petition No. 3505 of 1994, Ram Prasad...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Apr 19 2004

Subhash Singhania and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-19-2004

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973 - Sections 19, 23 and 23A; Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh (Amendment) Act, 1996; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(1)MPHT192; 2004(4)MPLJ13

Advocate for Respondent : D.D. Vyas, Addl. Adv. General for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, ;Anand Agrawal, Adv. for the Respondent No. 4, ;B.L. Pavecha, Sr. Adv. and ;S. Pathak, Adv. for the Respondent No. 5 and ;M.L. Agarwal, S

ORDERS.K. Seth, J.1. The petitioners have invoked the extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to claim the following reliefs:-'(a) Issue appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the revised lay outs of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days
  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales