Advanced Search Results

Dr. Mahender Singh Dhaiya Vs. State (Cbi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 201 and 302; Evidence Act - Sections 6, 11, 17 to 21, 32, 39, 145, 155 and 157; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 162, 164, 313 and 342; Indian Law;

Reported in : 2003CriLJ1908; 102(2003)DLT592; 2003(66)DRJ616

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Saxena, Special Public Prosecutor

R.C. Jain, J.1. The Appellant Dr. Mahender Singh Dahiya, an Indian Orthopedic Surgeon stands convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code for having committed the murder of his...

Sidharth Vashisth @ Manu Sharma Vs. State of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 201, 212 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 437(1) and 439(1)

Reported in : 2003VIIIAD(Delhi)176; 2004CriLJ684; 108(2003)DLT134; 2004(72)DRJ124; 2003(3)JCC1846

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Saxena, SPP and ; R.K. Nirban, Adv.

J.D. Kapoor, J.1. Though through instant Crl.M(M) petition extension for interim bail was sought but through Crl.M.558/03 moved in this main petition prayer for regular bail has been made. 2. Petitioner is facing a trial in...

Sidharath Vashisht @ Manu Sharma Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161 and 439; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 201 and 302; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27

Reported in : 2002IAD(Delhi)137; 2002CriLJ341; 95(2002)DLT652; 2001(60)DRJ783

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Saxena, Special Public Prosecutor

R.C. Chopra, J. 1. The petitioner, who is facing trail for offence under Sections302/201/120-B of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC') andSection 27 of the Arms Act in the case, commonly known as...

Om Prakash and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 117(6), 229 and 229B

Reported in : 2005(2)AWC1151; 2005(3)ESC1897

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Saxena, ;Prem Chandra, ;S.M.A. Kazmi, ;V.B. Singh, Advs. and ;P.L. Agyari, S.C.

Arun Tendon, J.1. Heard Sri S. N. Verma senior advocate, assisted by Sri Sharad Malviya, on behalf of the petitioner, Sri S. K. Saxena on behalf of respondent No. 3, and Sri S. M. A. Kazmi,...

In Re: Ktc Private Limited,

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 235 to 251, 391 to 394, 394(1), 394(2), 394(3), 394A, 397 and 398; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 76 and 80

Reported in : [2006]66SCL241(All)

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Saxena, Adv.

S.P. Mehrotra, J.1. The present Company Petition under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 has been fried by KTC Private Limited haying its Registered Office at 117/H-2/202, Pandu Nagar, Kanpur-208005, Uttar Pradesh (hereinafter...

In Re: Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 446, 446(1), 446(3) and 466

Reported in : [2005]128CompCas436(All); [2005]63SCL192(All)

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Saxena and ;Ram, Advs.

ORDERTarun Agarwala, J.1. The applicant, M/s. Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. has filed an application under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') praying that permission be granted to the applicant-company...

In Re: Srishti Video Corpn. Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434 and 466

Reported in : [2005]63SCL171(All)

Advocate for Respondent : S.D. Singh, ;R.P. Agarwal, ;Anurag Khanna, ;Muralidhar and ;S.K. Saxena, Advs.

ORDERTarun Agarwala, J.1. A number of petitions were filed for winding up of the company known as M/s. Srishti Video Corpn. Ltd. under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956. This Court on 16-8-1999...

In Re: Rohit Soaps and Detergents Private Limited;

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 235 to 251, 391 to 394, 394A, 394(2), 394(3), 397 and 398; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 76

Reported in : [2005]61SCL161(All)

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Saxena, Adv.

S.P. Mahrotra, J.1. The present Company Petition under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 has been filed by Rohit Soaps & Detergents Private Limited, having its Registered Office at 117/H-2/202, Pandu Nagar, Kanpur-208005,...

Indian Maize and Chemicals Ltd. (In Liquidation) Vs. Official Liquidat ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 529, 529A, 529A(1), 529A(2) and 546; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1985

Reported in : (2002)2CompLJ32(All)

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Saxena, Official Liquidator

Sunil Ambwani, J.1. Heard Sri R.P. Agarwal for the applicant and Sri S.K. Saxena, Official Liquidator.2. This application has been filed for the relief to direct the Official Liquidator to settle the claims of the workmen...

In Re: Juggilal Kamlapat Holding Ltd.,

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 67; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 97, 391 and 394

Reported in : [2006]132CompCas237(All); [2006]71SCL149(All)

ORDERSunil Ambwani, J.1. This company application by summons as provided in Rule 67 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 was filed under Section 391/394 of the Companies Act, 1956 jointly by Juggilal Kamlapat Holding Ltd., having...