Advanced Search Results

1. State of Jammu and Kashmir Through Commissioner/ Secretary Vs. Jasp ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S. K. Puri

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU LPASW No. 104 OF2007AND LPASW No. 99 OF20071. State of Jammu & Kashmir Through Commissioner/ Secretary Agriculture & Cooperative Department, Civil Secretariat, Jammu.2. Registrar, Cooperative Societies,J&K.3. Joint Registrar...

G.A. Mani Vs. Food Corporation of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 20; Limitation Act, 1963 - Article 119

Reported in : ILR1980Delhi490

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. S. K. Puri

O.N. Vohra, J. (1) Shri G. A. Mani, sole proprietor of Messrs. G.A. Mani Sex-79, filed this application under Sections 14 and 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, hereinafter called 'the Act', stating that disputes having...

Vijaya Bank Vs. Gold Foot Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : BankingCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 20

Reported in : 74(1998)DLT696; 1998(46)DRJ788; (1998)120PLR20

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Puri, Adv.

K. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The plaintiff bank has instituted the suit for the recovery of a sum of Rs.1,32,962/- against defendants 1 to 3 with interest @ 19.5% p.a. from 16.1.1986 onwards. The suit was instituted on...

B.A. Rather and anr. Vs. H.K. Dua and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Press and Registration of Books Act, 1967 - Section 7

Reported in : 1994CriLJ3414

Advocate for Respondent : B. Nazki, Adv. General,; S.K. Puri,; R.K Gupta, Adv

V.K. Gupta, J.1. On 17, March, 1994 we had pronounced the operative part of the Judgment whereby apology of respondent No. 1 was accepted and respondent No. 4 was convicted for committing contempt of this court...

Sri. Rahul Kumar Raja vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6475 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI RAHUL KUMAR RAJA S/O CHANDRA...

Shanti Yadav and ors Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 12, 226, 32

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ruchir Mishra; Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advs.

1. The twenty six Petitioners who are part of the teaching and non-teaching staff of Asha AWWA School for Handicapped Children (hereinafter „the School”), Respondent No. 5, have filed this writ petition seeking directions to the...

Maya Devi Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 438

Reported in : 1997(40)DRJ619

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. M.S. Butalia

J.B. Goel, J.(1) By this order I shall dispose of petitioner's application under section 438 of the Code of Criminal procedure for anticipatory bail. (2) Briefly the facts are that an information of quarrel taking place...

Sh. Deep Chand Vs. Sh. Kulanand Lakhera and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 9; Land Tenancy Act; Madras Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955; Andhra Pradesh Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955; Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 - Sections 86A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 145, 145(1) and 146(1)

Reported in : 140(2007)DLT765; 2007(95)DRJ683

Advocate for Respondent : D.K. Mishra, Adv. for R-1, ; Sangeeta Chandra, ; Vijay Shar

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. Dealing with possession, in Chapter 9, Salmond On Jurisprudence (12th Edition), states that few relationships are as vital to man as that of possession, and we may expect any system of law, however...

Harish C. BhasIn and anr. Vs. Bank of Baroda and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Banking Regulations

Acts : Banking Regulations Act,1949 - Section 45; Limitation Act - Section 19; Indian Contract Act - Section 62

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Pallav Saxena, Adv.

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? 1. The present appeal is filed...

Gyandeo SharmA. Vs. State of Bihar.

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482, 144, 207, 221(2), 300(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 147, 146, 148, 149, 323, 307, 336, 353; Arms Act - Section 27; Damage to Public Property Act - Sections 3, 5

Advocate for Respondent : Smt. Indu Bala Pandey, Adv.

1. The sole petitioner, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has prayed for quashing of an order dated 21.12.2006, passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,...