Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s k malik · Page 1 of about 29 results (0.187 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 04 2001

Union of India and ors. Vs. Shri Ram Kishan Verma and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-04-2001

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2001(1)WLC604; 2001(1)WLN483

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Malik, Adv.

ORDERLAKSHMANAN, CJ.(1) Heard Mr. Vinit Kumar Mathur, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. S.K. Malik learned counsel for the respondents.(2). These writ petitions were filed questioning the correctness of the order passed by the Central...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 1998

State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Rajendra Kumar Verma

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-20-1998

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1998(2)WLC437; 1998(1)WLN55

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S.K. Malik

B.S. Chauhan, J.1. The instant appeal has been filed by the State and others the appellants against the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge dated 26.9.1997 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1329/94...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2004

Ram Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Jodhpur

Decided on : Mar-23-2004

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)(1)SLJ148CAT

1. Shri Ram Singh Meena has filed this Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 and has sought following reliefs:- "(a) By an appropriate order, writ or direction, Impugned Order dated 17...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 07 2002

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. C.A.T. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-07-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226

Reported in : RLW2004(1)Raj576

Advocate for Respondent : Manoj Bhandari, Adv.

Mathur, J.1. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the Union of India seeking direction to quash the judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 2014

Miss Bina Kumari Vs. State and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Oct-10-2014

Subject : Right to Information

S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.10033/2013. Miss Bina Kumari versus State of Rajathan & Anr..Final Order dated 10.10.2014 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. :: ORDER :: S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.10033/2013. Miss Bina...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 1996

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Walchandnagar Indus. Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-09-1996

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1996)(88)ELT666TriDel

1. In this appeal filed by the Revenue, the matter relates to the interpretation of exemption Notification No. 118/75-CE., dated 30-4-19871. Under this Notification No. 118/75-C.E. goods classifiable under Item No. 68 when used for captive...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2002

Kailash and Company Vs. Director of Supplies and

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Decided on : Nov-28-2002

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : I(2003)CPJ88MRTP

1. The matter was passed over once and called for the second time.There is no appearance on behalf of the complainant.2. The complainant has filed a complaint in respect of the tender bearing No. A/T.No/ 101/0011/30.3.84/C-60/008/RP/COAD/025...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 23 2004

Smt. Paramshila Devi Vs. Kamlesh Kumar Pal

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-23-2004

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 17 and 17(1); Stamp Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC),1908 - Order 9, Rule 13

Reported in : 2005(1)ARC263; 2005(2)AWC1214

Advocate for Respondent : G.S.D. Mishra, ;G.K. Gupta, ;A.K. Sachan, Advs. and ;S.K. Malik, S.C.

Anjani Kumar, J. 1. This writ petition filed by the petitioner-tenant under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the order dated 1.11.2003 passed by the revisional court.2. The facts leading to filing of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 04 1999

LaxminaraIn Deohare and Etc. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-04-1999

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 60

Reported in : AIR2000MP175

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Mukherjee, ;Ravindra Shrivastava and ;J.P. Sanghi, Advs.

Dipak Misra, J. 1. Both the writ petitions being interlinked and inter-connected were heard analogously and are disposed of by this common order. In W. P. No. 3297/99 the challenge is to the grant of catering...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 18 2007

Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Tech. Th. Its Vice-c ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Jul-18-2007

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : [2007(114)FLR837]

Rajesh Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri Rajendra Dobhal Counsel for the appellant.Present appeals have been filed against the judgment and award dated 19.7.1999 and order dated 12.12.2000 passed by the Workmen Compensation Commissioner, Haldwani awarding a sum...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial