Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s k kulshrestha · Page 1 of about 240 results (0.059 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 13 1998

Anil Kumar Satish Kumar Nahta Vs. Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-13-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1999)152CTR(MP)516

ORDERS.K. KULSHRESTHA, J.This petition challenges the notice Annexure F.2 issued under s. 148 of the IT Act, 1961, and seeks an order that the proceedings under s. 147/148 for the asst. yr. 1981-82 be declared illegal,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2008

Gaurav Nagar Grihanirman Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Vs. State of M.P. a ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-13-2008

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2008(4)MPHT64

ORDERS.K. Kulshrestha, J.1. Shri A.K. Sethi, Senior Advocate with Shri Rahul Counsel for the appellant.2. Heard on admission.This appeal assails the order dated 12-9-2007 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. No. 5167/2007 by which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2007

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. M.P. Financial Corporation

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-13-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2008]299ITR297(MP)

S.K. Kulshrestha, J.1. Ms. Veena Mandlik, counsel for the appellant/ Revenue. This appeal has been filed under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the order dated October 19,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 28 2007

Sarita and ors. Vs. Mahboob Khan and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-28-2007

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2008ACJ2354

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Sudha Shrivastava

S.K. Kulshrestha, J.1. Mr. Sanjay Patwa, counsel for the appellants. Ms. Sudha Shrivastava, counsel for the respondent No. 2. With the consent of the parties, the appeal was finally heard. By this appeal the appellant seeks...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 06 2007

Ramesh Singh Gangwar and ors. Vs. Amarjit Singh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-06-2007

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2009ACJ812

S.K. Kulshrestha, J.1. Mr. M.K. Sharma, counsel for the applicant, heard finally on the question of review.2. This application has been filed to seek review of the order passed in M.A. No. 345 of 2005 Ramesh...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 2006

State of M.P. Vs. Bardanilal Ahirwar

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-21-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471; Schedule Caste Schedule Tribes (Atrocities) Act

Reported in : 2006CriLJ4676

Advocate for Respondent : Manish Datt, Adv.

ORDERS.K. Kulshrestha, J.1. Counsel heard on the question of cancellation of bail granted to the non-applicant by order dated 1-8-2005 of the learned Special Judge, Indore S.C. S.T. (Atrocities) Act cum Additional Sessions Judge, Indore in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 1991

Lakhan Lal Baronia Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-10-1991

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Banking Companies Act - Sections 45G; Constitution of India - Article 20(3); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 109, 175, 379, 403, 420, 427 and 461; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 94, 175, 195(1), 340, 341, 341(2), 397(3) and 482

Reported in : 1991CriLJ2546

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Kulshrestha, Adv.

ORDERS.R. Bhargava, J.1. This Revision has arisen in curious circumstances.2. Revisionist Lakhan Lal Baronia is Principal of a college at Lalitpur. Opposite Party No. 2 Krishna Nandan Prasad Sinha is a teacher in the same college....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 2004

Vimla Devi Vs. Ram Babu

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-06-2004

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1) and 24; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 9, Rule 9

Reported in : II(2004)DMC639

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Kulshrestha, Adv.

M. Katju, J.1. Heard learned Counsels for the parties.This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment of the Court below dated 29.10.1998 by which the respondent's petition for divorce has been decreed.2. The respondent had...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2010

Mangey Ram. Vs. Mangey Ram.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-02-2010

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (C.P.C) - Order 7 Rule 11; Specific Relief Act - Section 34

Advocate for Respondent : C.S.C.; S.K. Kulshrestha; V.K. Singh, Advs.

1. Khasra No. 833 A area 2 Bigha 10 Biswa 1 Biswansi and Khasra No. 433 B area 16 Biswa 6 Biswansi, total 2 plots and total area 3 Bigha 8 Biswa 7 Biswansi are subject...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2008

Jepika Paints and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-22-2008

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 37, 44, 44(1) and 56(1)

Reported in : 2008(125)ECC224; 2008(151)LC224(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : V.K. Zelawat, Assistant Solicitor General

ORDERS.K. Kulshrestha, J.1. This appeal has been filed by the Assessee Appellants under the provisions of Section 35(g) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.The appeal has been admitted on the questions formulated in Order dated, 22nd...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial