Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s k dholakia · Page 1 of about 133 results (0.033 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 27 2007

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Sangram Keshari Nayak

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-27-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 309

Reported in : [2007(114)FLR718]; JT2007(6)SC272; 2007(6)SCALE348; (2007)6SCC704; 2008(1)SLJ84(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Dholakia, Sr. Adv., ; Manoj Kumar Das and ; Siba Sankar M

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Interpretation of a purported circular letter dated 21.01.1993 falls for our consideration in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 31.01.2005 passed by the High Court of Orissa in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 1991

N.K. JaIn and Others Vs. C.K. Shah and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-26-1991

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Seciton 8; Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 2, 4, 5, 6, 14(2A) and 17; Indian Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 5; Employees' Provident Fund and Family Pension Fund Act, 1952; Companies Act, 1929 - Sections 74 and 380; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; C.P. and Berar Industrial Disputes Settlement Act, 1947

Reported in : AIR1991SC1289; 1991CriLJ1347a; 1991(2)Crimes94(SC); [1991(62)FLR657]; (1991)2GLR910; JT1991(2)SC52; (1995)IIILLJ300bSC; 1991(1)SCALE519; (1991)2SCC495; [1991]1SCR938a

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Dholakia and ; Anip Sachthey, Advs.

ORDERK. Jayachandra Reddy, J.1. The question of general importance that arises in these three appeals is whether criminal proceedings can be instituted under Section 14 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 ('Act'...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 14 1993

State of Orissa Vs. Md. FakiruddIn and Dr (Mrs) Girishbala Mohanty

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-14-1993

Subject : Service

Acts : Orissa Education Service (Senior Administrative Grade) Recruitment Rules, 1990 - Rules 9, 9(1), 9(2) and 10 to 13; Orissa Education Service (Senior Administrative Grade) Recruitment (Amendment) Rules, 1992

Reported in : [1994(68)FLR15]; JT1993(6)SC240; 1994LabIC455; (1994)ILLJ932SC; 1993(4)SCALE166; 1994Supp(1)SCC479; [1993]Supp3SCR269; 1994(1)SLJ131(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Dholakia and ; J.K. Das, Advs.

N. Venkatachala, J.1. Leave is granted.2. These appeals of the State of Orissa are directed against the common Judgment dated April 6, 1993 in O.A. Nos. 1088 and 1587 of 1992 of the Orissa Administrative Tribunal....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 22 2001

Kandaswamy Vs. Board of Management, H.S.i. Said Mosque

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-22-2001

Subject : TenancyProperty

Acts : Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 - Sections 21(1)(I) and 50; Transfer of Property Act, 1882

Reported in : AIR2001SC1269; JT2001(4)SC123; 2001(2)SCALE529; (2001)3SCC614; [2001]2SCR677

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Dholakia, Sr. Adv., ; Atul Y. Chitale, ; Rakesh Sinha

ORDERD.P. Mohapatra, J.1. Leave granted.2. The decision in this appeal rests on the interpretation of Section 21(1)(1) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The question to be considered is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 1994

Shantibai (Smt) and ors. Vs. Dinkar Balkrishna Vaidya and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-02-1994

Subject : PropertyTenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 14 and 15; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control (Amendment) Act, 1959; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control (Amendment) Act, 1973

Reported in : (1994)96BOMLR187; 1997CriLJ1713; JT1994(2)SC187; 1994(1)SCALE836; (1994)4SCC85; [1994]2SCR296; 1994(1)LC656(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Dholakia and ; V.A. Bobde, Senior Advs. and ; V. Bhagat

S. Mohan, J. 1. The short facts leading to this civil appeal are as under:2. The suit property was originally owned by Trimbak Hari Awate. He executed a simple mortgage on 28.4.1947 to an extent of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2009

Central Bank of India Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-27-2009

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 38C and 39; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 2, 2(2) and 26B; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 2, 2(1), 13(4), 13(10), 13(12), 11(2), 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(5), 18, 19(1), 19(6), 19(7), 19(8), 19(12), 19(13), 19(18), 19(19), 20(1), 21, 22, 25, 28, 29, 31(1), 31A, 34(1), 36 and 37; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions (Amendment) Act, 2000; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions (Amendment) Act, 2004; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 2, 3 to 12, 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(3A), 13(4), 13(7), 13(9), 13(10), 13(12), 34(1), 35 and 38(1); Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1968 - Sectio

Reported in : [2010]153CompCas497(SC); JT2009(3)SC216; 2009(3)SCALE451; (2009)4SCC94; (2009)12VatReporter137; (2009)21VST505(SC); JT2009(1)SC216; [2009] 3 SCR 735

Advocate for Respondent : R. Mohan, ASG, ; Rakesh Dwivedi, ; S.K. Dholakia, ;

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. Leave granted in S.L.P. (C) No. 24767 of 2005.2. Whether Section 38C of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 [for short 'the Bombay Act'] and Section 26B of the Kerala General Sales Tax...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 1987

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-22-1987

Subject : Environment

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 48-A, 51-A and 252; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 - Sections 2, 16, 17 and 24; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 9 and 15; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order I, Rule 8

Reported in : AIR1988SC1037; (1987)3CompLJ69(SC); JT1987(3)SC630; 1987(2)SCALE611; (1987)4SCC463; [1988]1SCR279; 1988(1)LC75(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : B. Datta, ; R.A. Gunta, ; S.K. Dholakia, ;

ORDERE.S. Venkataramiah, J.1. This is a public interest litigation. The petitioner who is an active social worker has filed this petition inter alia for the issue of a writ/order/direction in the nature of mandamus to the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 1997

State of Gujarat Vs. Ratilal Laljibhai Tandol and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-20-1997

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1997(2)ALD(Cri)766; (1998)1GLR539; JT1997(7)SC614; 1997(5)SCALE650; (1997)7SCC227; [1997]Supp3SCR473

Advocate for Respondent : Sushil Kumar, Adv. (Amicus curiae)

ORDER1. Leave granted.2. Heard Mr. S.K. Dholakia, the learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant -State of Gujarat and Mr. Sushil Kumar, the learned senior counsel appearing as amicus curiae to assist the Court in this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2005

Pushpender and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-23-2005

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)(91)SLJ238CAT

1. As the facts are interwoven with identical question of law, for the sake of brevity and to avoid multiplicity, these O.As. are being disposed of by this common order.2. At the outset, after allowing all...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 1999

Madras Petro-chem Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-23-1999

Subject : Excise

Reported in : AIR1999SC3798; 1999(108)ELT611(SC); (2000)10SCC34

1. Leave granted.2. Heard Mr. S.K. Dholakia, the learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant -State of Gujarat and Mr. Sushil Kumar, the learned senior counsel appearing as amicus curiae to assist the Court in this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial