Advanced Search Results

Valsala vs V.G Sasikumar

Court : Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 2ND MAGHA, 1945 RSA NO. 225 OF 2023 AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED...

Seetha Mohanan Vs. Narasingha Shenoy

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. S.B. Premachandra Prabhu

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA WEDNESDAY, THE3D DAY OF DECEMBER201412TH AGRAHAYANA, 1936 RFA.No. 101 of 2008 ( ) ------------------------ AGAINST THE...

Bharath Trust Vs. D. Divakara Rao

Court : Kerala

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 69(2)

Reported in : AIR1993Ker88

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Brahmanandan, Adv.

ORDERK.S. Paripoornan, J.1. The plaintiff in O.S. No. 957 of 1983, Munsiffs Court, Cherthala, is the revision petitioner. The suit was filed for recovery of money from the respondent-defendant. The plaintiff is a registered firm. The...

Malathi Amma Vs. Kallyanikutty Amma

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 149 - Order 33, Rules 8, 9 and 11; Court-fees Act

Reported in : AIR1961Ker128

Advocate for Respondent : T.M. Mahalinga Iyer and; S.K. Brahmanandan, Advs. for 1st Respondent in C.R.P. 862 of 1958,;

ORDERP.T. Raman Nayar, J.1. These petitions arise out of seven suits brought by the same plaintiffs, and they pose a question under Order XXXIII of the Code which seems to be well nigh bereft of authority.2....

Kerala State Electricity Board Vs. P.M. Maitheyan

Court : Kerala

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 51

Reported in : AIR1973Ker95

Advocate for Respondent : N.R. Shenoy and; S.K. Brahmanandan, Advs.

Unnikrishna Kurup, J. 1. The Kerala State Electricity Board, who was the defendant in a suit for a mandatory injunction for the removal of the electric lines drawn over the property of the respondent, is the...

Appula Vadhyar Narayana Vadhyar Vs. Venkateswara Vadhyar and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 107 and 108

Reported in : AIR1971Ker85

Advocate for Respondent : S. Venkitarajan, Adv. in A.S. No. 86 of 1965 and; S.K. Brahmanandan, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 in A.S

Krishnamoorthy Iyer, J. 1. S. A. 88 of 1965 arises out of O. S. m of 1958 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Ernakulam and the plaintiff therein is the appellant. 2. S. A....

Craft Centre and ors. Vs. the Koncherry Coir Factories, Cherthala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 18(2)

Reported in : AIR1991Ker83

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Brahmanandan and; G.S. Prabhu, Advs.

S. Padmanabhan, J.1. Law of limitation is not meant to be an aid to unconscionable conduct, although, if a claim is clearly barred, the Court must unhesitatingly dismiss the suit. It is a law of repose,...

CochIn Port Trust Vs. Associated Cotton Traders Limited and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : CustomsLimitation

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 151, 152 and 162; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 106; Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 - Sections 43(2) and 120; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4 to 24 and 29(2)

Reported in : AIR1983Ker154

Advocate for Respondent : S. Sampath Kumar,; S.K. Brahmanandan and; G.S. Prabhu

Bhat, J. 1. Defendant in O. S. No. 84 of 1970 on the file of the Sub Court, Cochin, the Cochin Port Trust, has filed this appeal against the decree and -judgment dated 15-6-1976 of the...

N. Vittal Praphu Vs. Shrimath Auamtheshwara Temple, Manjeshwar and ors ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 18 - Schedule - Article 136

Reported in : AIR1986Ker221

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Brahmanandan and; G.S. Prabhu, Advs.

ORDERT. Kochu Thommen, J.1. This Civil Revision Petition is against an order directing attachment of an amount of Rs. 2,000/- in execution of a decree for money. The petitioner's contention that the application for execution was...

Balak Glass Emporium Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 2

Reported in : AIR1993Ker342

Advocate for Respondent : P.V. Narayanan Nambiar and M.P. Asok Kumar and; S.K. Brahmanandan, G.S. Prabhu and S.B. Premachandra

G. Rajasekharan, J.1. Plaintiff in a suit for damages is the appellant. The first defendant is an Insurance Company and defendants 2 to 6 are the legal representatives of one Joseph. 2. Plaintiff-Firm was occupying the...