Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s k bagaria · Page 1 of about 229 results (0.152 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 08 2010

Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad Vs. Solid and Correct Engine ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-08-2010

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3, 5A(1) and 35L; ;Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(25), 3(26) and 3(36); ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 3

Reported in : 2010(175)LC8(SC),2010(3)LC1635(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Bagaria, Sr. Adv.,; Tarun Gulati,; Rony John,;

T.S. Thakur, J.1. These appeals under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 arise out of orders dated 19th August, 2002 and 8th April, 2003 passed by the Customs Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 2007

Modipon Fibre Company, Modinagar, U.P. Vs. Commissioner of Central Exc ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-25-2007

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 4(2), 4(4), 11A and 35L; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3; Finance Act, 1982 - Sections 47; Central Excise Rules - Rules 8 and 173C

Reported in : 2007(122)ECC401; 2007(148)LC401(SC); JT2007(12)SC458; (2007)10SCC3; 2007AIRSCW6819

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Bagaria, Sr. Adv., ; Rohina Nath, ; Javed Mujaffar

S.H. Kapadia, J.1. Delay condoned.2. These cross appeals are filed by M/s Modipon Fibre Company and the Department under Section 35L of Central Excise Act, 1944 against order dated 3.7.2001 passed by the Customs Excise &...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 2006

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Atul Commodities Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-07-2006

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 111, 112 and 124; ;Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 - Sections 5; Customs Valuation Rules, 1988 - Rules 6, 8 and 10(A); ; Constitution of India - Article 22B

Reported in : 2006(202)ELT392(Ker)

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Bagaria, Sr. Counsel,; V.M. Kurian,; Mathew B. Kuri

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J. 1. These appeals have been preferred by the Commissioner of Customs. Common questions arise for consideration in all these appeals and hence we are disposing of these cases by a common judgment. Question...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 21 1984

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Calcutta Credit Corporation Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-21-1984

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 256(1); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 40 - Rule 1

Reported in : [1986]158ITR536(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Bagaria and ;R.N. Bajoria, Adv.

Ajit K. Sengupta, J.1. In this reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal has referred the following question of law for the opinion of this court :' Whether, on the facts and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 2017

Delhi International Airport P. Ltd. Vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-14-2017

Subject : Service Tax

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Delivered on:14. h February, 2017 + WP(C) 2516/2008 & CM No.15832/2011 DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT P. LTD. ........ Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & Ors …..Respondents...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 2017

Mumbai International Airport p.ltd vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-14-2017

Subject : Service Tax

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Delivered on:14. h February, 2017 + WP(C) 2516/2008 & CM No.15832/2011 DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT P. LTD. ........ Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & Ors …..Respondents...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2011

Home Solutions Retails (India) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-23-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 246; Finance Act, 1995 - Section 65(105)(zzzz); Companies Act, 1956; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 105; Indian Easements Act

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.A.S.Chandhiok And Ors.

1 In this batch of writ petitions preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the constitutional validity of Section 65(105)(zzzz) of the Finance Act, 1995 (for short „the 1995 Act) and Section 66 as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 11 2016

Jindal Stainless Ltd. and Anr. Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-11-2016

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Rohatgi

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3453/2002 JINDAL STAINLESS LTD.& ANR. …Appellants VS. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. …Respondents WITH C.A. No.6383-6421/1997, C.A. No.6422-6435/1997, C.A. No.6436/1997, C.A. No.6437-6440/1997 , C.A. No.3381-3400/1998,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 2009

J and K Cigarettes Ltd. and ors. Vs. Collector of Central Excise and o ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-28-2009

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 9D, 9D(1), 9D(2), 11DDA, 13, 14, 14A and 33A; Customs Act; Evidence Act - Sections 24, 32, 32(2) and 33; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973; Central Excise Rules - Rule 52 and 52A; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2009(242)ELT189(Del)

Advocate for Respondent : Mohan Parasaran, ASG, ; Rajesh Katyal, Advs. and ; Satyavir

A.K. Sikri, J.1. All these writ petitions filed by the same petitioner raise identical issue which relates to the constitutional validity and/or interpretation of the provisions of Section 9D of the Central Excise and Salt Act,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 04 2023

Commissioner Of Income Tax 8 Mumbai Vs. Glowshine Builders And Develop ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-04-2023

Subject : Direct Taxation

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2565 OF2022Commissioner of Income ...Appellant(s) Tax 8 Mumbai Versus Glowshine Builders & …Respondent(s) Developers Pvt. Ltd. JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial