Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s jayaraman and · Page 1 of about 124 results (0.110 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 08 1999

State Bank Employees' Union (rep. by General Secretary) and Anr. Vs. S ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-08-1999

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 18(1) and 25H

Reported in : (2001)IIILLJ639Mad

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. S. Jayaraman

E. Padmanabhan, J. 1. The first-petitioner is a registered trade Union, while the second petitioner claims to be one of the affected 321 workmen for whose benefit, the writ petition has been filed.2. The petitioners prayed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 1997

A. Subramanian Vs. Punjab National Bank Represented by Its Chairman-cu ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-03-1997

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1998)2MLJ233

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S. Jayaraman

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. After hearing the learned Counsel for the appellant, the writ appeal is admitted. By consent of both parties, the writ appeal is taken up for final hearing.2. The writ appeal is directed against...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 1996

C.R. Mugundan and ors. Vs. Director General (Member Secretary), Indian ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-19-1996

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1996)ILLJ849Mad; (1996)IMLJ523

Advocate for Respondent : S. Jayaraman, Adv.

ORDERAr. Lakshmanan, J.1. The prayer in W.P, No. 18969 of 1994 is to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to regularise the services of the petitioners in their respective categories as they are working...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 29 2000

Sundaram Industries Employees Union (Coach Division) Vs. Management of ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-29-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2

Reported in : (2000)IILLJ990Mad

Advocate for Respondent : S. Jayaraman, Adv. for Respondents 1 and 2 and ;K. Balsubramanian, Adv. for Respondent 3

N.V. Bala Subramanian, J.1. The writ petition is for the issue of a writ of declaration to declare the demand of respondents 1 and 2 (hereinafter to be referred to as the management) that the members...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 2003

R. Varadachari Vs. the Management of the Press Trust of India, Parliam ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-06-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2003)IILLJ420Mad

Advocate for Respondent : S. Jayaraman, Adv. for RR1 and 2

ORDERE. Padmanabhan, J.1. In W.P. No. 10076 of 1998, the petitioner, R. Varadachari has prayed for the issue of a writ of certiorari to call for the records in I.D. No. 53/91 dated 12.3.97 on the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2006

K. Kamatchi Vs. the Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corp ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-06-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 12(3); Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 - Sections 2, 47 and 47(1); Workmen's Compensation Act; Constitution of India

Reported in : (2006)IILLJ406Mad; (2006)1MLJ394

Advocate for Respondent : S. Jayaraman, Adv.

ORDERP. Jyothimani, J.1. This writ petition is filed challenging the order of the first respondent dated 15.03.2001 and also for directing the first respondent to provide alternative employment to the petitioner in terms of Sections 82...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 1998

Varghese Daniel Vs. Balakrishan and Another

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-31-1998

Subject : property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Sections 115 -- Order 39 -- Rule 1

Reported in : 1998(2)CTC337

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S. Jayaraman for;Mr. C. Rajan, Adv.

ORDER1. This civil Revision Petition has been preferred against the fair and decretal order made in C.M.A.No.175 of 1995 by the IV Additional City Civil Judge, Madras, on 7.2.1996, dismissing the said Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 1991

Provisional Liquidator, Ramakrishna Industries (Pvt.) Ltd. and Others ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-18-1991

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1992)IILLJ797Mad

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S. Jayaraman

Nainar Sundaram, Ag. C.J. 1. Respondents 8, 2 and 3 in W.P. No. 3035 of 1988 are the appellants in this writ appeal. Petitioners 1 to 5 in the writ petition are respondents 1 to 5...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 2002

P. Periasamy, S/O Ponnusamy, Cuddalore Vs. the General Manager (Operat ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-15-2002

Subject : Service

Reported in : (2002)IIILLJ701Mad

Advocate for Respondent : S. Jayaraman, Adv.

ORDER1. By consent the main writ petition itself was taken up and arguments heard.2. The facts leading to the filing of the writ petition may be summarised as follows:The writ petitioner was working as a Conductor...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 1998

Indian Oxygen Employees' Union and Ors. Vs. BOC India Ltd. (Formerly I ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-24-1998

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 72 and 95; Employees' State Insurance (General) Regulation, 1950 - Regulations 92 and 97; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 19(1); Companies Act, 1956

Reported in : (1998)IILLJ1248Mad

Advocate for Respondent : A.L. Somayaji, Adv. for Gupta & Ravi in W.A. No. 254/1998, ;S. Ramasubramanian, Adv. for S. Jayaraman in W.P. No. 8503/1997 and ;G. Subramanian, Adv. for T.S. Gopalan & Co. in W.P. Nos. 3117 a

E. Padmanabhan, J.1. The above Writ Appeal and the writ petitions were taken up together for final disposal.2. Mr. N.G.R.Prasad, learned counsel appeared for the appellant in W.A.No. 254/1998, W.P.Nos. 479/1998, 8503/1997. Mr. A.L.Somayaji, Senior Counsel...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial