Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s j thakkar · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.120 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 04 2005

Flowfast Engineers (India) Vs. D and H Secheron Electrodes Pvt. Ltd. a ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-04-2005

Subject : CivilContract

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 46; Indian Partnership Act; Evidence Act - Sections 114; Municipal Rules

Reported in : AIR2005Bom204; 2005(2)BomCR497; 2005(2)MhLj482; [2005]64SCL559(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : S.J. Thakkar, ;D.J. Kakalia, ;Bhavana Singh and ;Puja Jain, Advs. i/b., Mulla and Mulla and Craigie Blunt and Caroe for defendant No. 1

Shah S.K., J.1. The plaintiffs filed this suit for specific performance of the oral agreement dated 30-11-1977 for purchase of Basement-cum-godown premises as described in Exhibit 'A' annexed to the plaint. 2. The plaintiffs are a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 1992

Rama Aziz Parpia and ors. Vs. Balkrishna K. Mehta and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-03-1992

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 104 and 119; Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980 - Rules 238 and 249

Reported in : 1993(1)BomCR267; (1993)95BOMLR951

Advocate for Respondent : S.J. Thakkar, Adv. i/b., Mulla & Mulla Craigie Blunt & Caroe, for defendants 1 and 2

B.N. Srikrishna, J.1. This originating summons has been taken out by some of the legatees under the Will of the deceased Dr. Vithaldas Ladhabhai Parmar (hereinafter referred to as 'the deceased') for certain directions to the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2003

Sebi Vs. Jyoti Resins and Adhesives Ltd.

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on : Apr-10-2003

Subject : MRTP

1. Jyoti Resins & Adhesives Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as JRAL) was incorporated as Public Limited Company on December 7, 1993. The Company is engaged in production of Resins and Adhesives. The company was promoted by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 15 2000

Mrs. Pushpa P. Mulchandani and ors. (All Petitioners Through Constitut ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-15-2000

Subject : ArbitrationLimitation

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9, 34(3), 43, 82 and 85(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 24(1) and 141 - Order 1, Rule 10; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 9, 14, 37(1) and 41- Order 1, Rule 8 - Rules 772 to 789; Indian Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 2, 4 to 24, 29 and 33 - Articles 119 and 137; Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Limitation Act, 1908 - Article 181; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 26-A; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 81; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 58 and 58(3)

Reported in : 2001(2)ARBLR284(Bom); 2001(1)BomCR592; (2001)1BOMLR169; 2000(4)MhLj819

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Iqbal Chagla and ;Mr. S.J. Thakkar, ;Advs. i/b Eastly Lam & Co., ;Mr. D.J. Khambhata, ;Adv. i/b Mulla & Mulla.

B. N. Srikrishna, J.1. This review petition has been taken out by the petitioners for review of the judgment and order dated 23rd April, 1999 by which the chamber summons was dismissed with regard to the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial