Advanced Search Results

Jayanta Kumar Banerjee Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 4

Reported in : AIR1981Cal138

Advocate for Respondent : D.K. Sen, ;A.P. Chatterjee, Addl. Standing Counsel, ;Sadhan Chandra Gupta, Addl. Adv.-General, ;Arun Kumar Matilal and ;Biplab Mitra, Advs., ;Gautam Chakraborty, S. Mitra and ;Uday Narayan Biswas, Adv

ORDERG.N. Ray, J. 1. In this Rule, a Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 bearing the date of publication as on May 28, 1979 in the Calcutta Gazette (Extraordinary) issued by the...

Setabi Dei Vs. Ramdhani Shaw and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(2) and 11 - Order 1, Rules 10(2) and 3 - Order 9, Rule 5 and 5(2); ;Hindu Widows' Remarriage Act, 1856 - Section 2

Reported in : AIR1966Cal60

Advocate for Respondent : S. Hazra, Adv. for Choteylal, ;N.N. Dutt, Adv. for one of the parties, ;P.K. Hazra, S.C. Adv. for Government Adv.

ORDERP.C. Mallick, J. 1. A very interesting point of law has been canvassed in this case. The point is whether the Court has the power to add a party against whom the suit was dismissed by...

Bar Council of West Bengal and ors. Vs. Miss Ajanta Aughstin

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Election

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Section 15; ;West Bengal Bar Council Rules - Rules 34, 34(1) and 36; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 9

Reported in : AIR1979Cal35,83CWN35

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Hazra and ;Durga Dutta, Advs.

ORDERMurari Mohan Dutt, JJ.1. This Rule is at the instance of the defendants, the Bar Council of West Bengal and two others, and it is directed against order No. 12, dated April 5, 1977, of the...

Sm. Sushama Roy Vs. Atul Krishna Roy and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 11 - Order 32, Rule 1; ;Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1955Cal624,59CWN779

Advocate for Respondent : Biswanath Naskar and ;S. Hazra, Advs.

Das Gupta, J. 1. This appeal raises the difficult question whether in a case where the shebaits of a deity have precluded themselves by their conduct from bringing a suit to protect the interests of the...

Kousher Ali Laskar Vs. Moslema Bibi and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 - Section 2A; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125 and 127

Reported in : I(2001)DMC350

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Biswas and ;S. Hazra, Advs.

Ranjan Kumar Mazumdar, J.1. The instant criminal revisional application under Section 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is at the instance of Shri Kousher Ali @ Kousher Ali Laskar, the petitioner,...

Smt. Gitika Bagchi Vs. Subhabrota Bagchi

Court : Kolkata

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1892 - Sections 4 and 114;; Special Marriage Act, 1954 - Sections 25 and 25(1);; Indian Contral Act, 1872 - Section 17

Reported in : AIR1996Cal246,100CWN646

Advocate for Respondent : S. Mukherjee and ;S. Hazra, Advs.

ORDERR. Bhattacharyva, J.1. This First Appeal arises for the suit being decreed under Section 25 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954, by the Id. Additional Dist. Judge in Matrimonial Suit No. 32 of 1990 on 18th...

Krishna Das Nandy Vs. Bidhan Chandra Roy

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105, 106, 107, 108 and 116; ;West Bengal Premises Rent Control (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1950 - Section 12(1); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 14, Rule 1 - Order 41, Rules 1 and 25; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Section 456(1)

Reported in : AIR1959Cal181,63CWN29

Advocate for Respondent : S.M. Bose, Adv. General, ;H.N. Sanyal, ;C.N. Laik, ;R.C. Dev, ;S. Hazra, ;J.K. Mukherjee, ;P.C. Chunder and ;A.K. Mukherjee, Advs.

P.N. Mookerjee, J. 1. This difficult case has been well argued and our only regret is that, however much we wished the contrary, this litigation would not end here but must go back to the trial...

Sudhir Kumar Ratneswar Saha Vs. Additional Commissioner of Commercial ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1967]20STC9(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : N.C. Chakraborty, ;S.S. Hazra and ; S.K. Kar, Advs.

Ajit Nath Roy, J.1. This Rule was obtained by the petitioners against the Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Commercial Tax Officer and the State of West Bengal requiring the opposite parties,...

Angshuman Das Gupta Vs. Jute Corporation of India Ltd. and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 311(1) and 311(2)

Advocate for Respondent : A. Chakraborty and A. Ghosh, Advs.

N.G. Das, J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for quashing the impugned order dated January 12, 1994 issued by the Chairman-cum-Managing Director, the Jute Corporation of...

Hardayan Garodia and ors. Vs. Gangadhar Periwal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 18, Rule 1, Order 21, Rule 49; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 58 and 101-103

Reported in : AIR1963Cal500

Advocate for Respondent : Salil Hazra, ;Datta and ;Banerji, Advs.

P.C. Mallick, J. 1. The plaintiffs seek to challenge in this suit the validity of an attachment and sale of a share in three tea gardens and the export quota rights therein.2. The plaintiffs are five...