Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s devanathan · Page 1 of about 9 results (0.036 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 22 1999

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Needle Industries (India) Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-22-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2000]108TAXMAN524(Mad)

ORDERJayasimha Babu, J.The assessee is engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of needles of various types. After the completion of the assessee's assessment under the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the year 1968-69 on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 1998

C. Shanwas Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-04-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1999)155CTR(Mad)435

ORDERMRS. T. MEENA KUMARI, J:The petitioner has filed this writ petition to issue a writ of certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the respondent relating to his order dt. 17th July, 1989, in C.No. 2031/1995,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 1997

Velimalai Rubber Company Ltd. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-10-1997

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28

Reported in : [1999]240ITR232(Mad)

Janarthanam, J.1. Desirable it is, on the facts and, circumstances of these cases, to pen down a common order. 2. The assessee, namely, Velimalai Rubber Co., Ltd., Kottayam, is one and the same in both these...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 22 1999

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Needle Industries (India) Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-22-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(14) and 28

Reported in : [2000]245ITR556(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : S. Devanathan, Adv.

R. Jayasimha Babu, J. 1. The assessee is engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of needles of various types. After the completion of the assessee's assessment under the Income-tax Act for the year 1968-69...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 1997

State of Tamil Nadu Vs. Elixir Plantations (P) Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-28-1997

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1955 - Sections 35

Reported in : [1998]231ITR601(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : S. Devanathan, Adv.

Jayasimha Babu, J. 1. The State has come in revision against the order of the Tribunal, which has held that the period of limitation prescribed in s. 35 of the Tamil Nadu Agrl. IT Act (hereinafter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 08 1998

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Needle Industries Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-08-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(43), 139(8), 215 and 244(1A)

Reported in : (1998)147CTR(Mad)514; [1998]233ITR370(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : S. Devanathan, Adv. for;K.C. Rajappa, Adv.

N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. This tax case reference raises an interesting question on the interpretation of Section 244(lA) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, (hereinafter to be referred to as 'the Act'). 2. The assessee is a company....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2007

Greaves Ltd. Vs. V.S. Raghavan and Vijayaraghavan

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-27-2007

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Sections 4, 23 and 25

Reported in : 2007(2)CTC262; (2007)4MLJ229

Advocate for Respondent : S. Devanathan, Adv.

ORDERR. Banumathi, J.1. Aggrieved by fixation of fair rent at Rs. 59,590/-, Tenant has preferred these revisions. The demised premises is situated at No. 13, II Line Beach Road, Madras.2. For convenience, parties are referred in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2010

Union of India (Uoi), Rep. by the Joint Secretary (Revenue), Governmen ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-30-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 16, 16(4), 239, 246, 341, 341(1), 342 and 342(1); ;The Constitution (Pondicherry) Scheduled Caste Order, 1964

Advocate for Respondent : S. Devanathan, Adv.

Elipe Dharmarao, J.1. The respondent herein has filed the writ petition No. 30841 of 2002, challenging the Memorandum No. 9565/C2/Rev/2000, dated 10.11.2000 issued by the first appellant herein and consequently to direct the second respondent herein...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 2001

B. Imtiaz Ahanied Vs. G. Banumathi and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-03-2001

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2003ACJ142

P. Sathasivam, J.1. The claimant in M.C.O.P. No. 586 of 1994 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Third Additional Subordinate Judge), Tiruchirapalli is the appellant in the above appeal. In respect of grievous...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial