Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s dessai · Page 1 of about 21 results (0.049 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 08 1996

Rishi Kumar and Others Vs. Mahesh Chandra Agarwal and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-08-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 155(2), 156(1), 190(1), 200 and 482

Reported in : 1997BomCR(Cri)852; 1997CriLJ2113

Advocate for Respondent : S. Dessai, Sr. Adv. and ;S.G. Bhobe, Adv.

ORDER1. Admit. 2. Senior Advocate Shri S. Dessai waives service on behalf of respondents No. 1 With consent of Advocates for the parties heard forthwith. 3. The petitioners have approached this Court under section 482, Cr.P.C....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 2009

Navelcar Hotels, Represented in This Act by Its Partner Mr. Harish Vin ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-06-2009

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 134 and 134(1); Goa Civil Courts Act, 1965; Trade Mark Rules, 2002; Constitution of India - Article 236; Goa Civil Courts Act, 1999 - Sections 3, 5, 9 and 14; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 3 and 7; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC),1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2009(6)BomCR270

Advocate for Respondent : S. Dessai, Sr. Adv. and; Utkarsh Tewari, Adv.

A.H. Joshi, J.1. This is an appeal arising out of interlocutory Order passed by the District Judge-2, Panaji in Civil Suit No. 76/2008 filed by the appellants under the provisions of Trade Marks Act seeking action...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 09 2012

Shailesh Manohar Sastikar, S/O. Late Manohar Sastikar Vs. State of Goa

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : Jul-09-2012

Subject : Criminal

U.V. Bakre, J. The appellant is the original accused no. 2 in Sessions Case no. 21 of 2008. He has been convicted by the learned Sessions Judge, Panaji (Trial Court) for offence punishable under Section 302...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 09 2012

Shailesh Manohar Sastikar, S/O. Late Manohar Sastikar Vs. State of Goa

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : Jul-09-2012

Subject : Criminal

U.V. Bakre, J. The appellant is the original accused no. 2 in Sessions Case no. 21 of 2008. He has been convicted by the learned Sessions Judge, Panaji (Trial Court) for offence punishable under Section 302...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2005

Shri Filipe Nery Rodrigues, Member of the Legislative Assembly of Goa ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-21-2005

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 73 and 114; Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 - Sections 14A; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 122(1), 136, 161(2), 212(1), 226 and 227; Procedure and Conduct of Business of the Goa Legislative Assembly Rules, 1992 - Rule 289; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Member of the Goa Legislative Assembly (Disqualification on Ground of Defection) Rules, 1986 - Rules 3, 3(3), 4, 5, 6, 6(2), 6(3), 6(4), 6(5), 6(6), 6(7), 7, 7(2), 7(4) and 7(6)

Reported in : 2006(2)BomCR424; (2006)108BOMLR227

Advocate for Respondent : S.G. Aney, Sr. Adv., ;V.P. Thali and ;G. Pednekar, Advs. for respondent No. 1, ;S.G. Dessai, Sr. Adv. and ;Shivan Dessai, Adv. for respondent No. 2 and ;A.F. Diniz, Adv. for respondent No. 3

D.D. Sinha, J.1. Heard Mr. S.K. Kakodkar, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. M.S. Sonak and Mr. P.S. Rao, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. S.G. Aney, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 12 2012

Sahajanand Investments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Goa, Through Its Public ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : Oct-12-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S. Dessai

Oral Judgment: Heard Mr. R. Bras De Sa, learned Advocate for petitioner, Ms. M. Pinto, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent no.1 and Mr. Shivan Dessai, learned Advocate for the respondent no.2 in all the petitions....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 03 2014

Archana Bhobe and Another Vs. Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Company Ltd. ...

Court : Goa State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Panaji

Decided on : Jan-03-2014

Subject : MRTP

N.A. Britto, President: 1. This consumer complaint filed on 25/09/13 is being disposed off by this order. 2. To cut a long story short, it may be stated that complainant No. 1 had purchased a sports...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 18 1998

Leonard J.S. Fernandes and Others Vs. the Canacona Municipal Council, ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-18-1998

Subject : Property

Acts : Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 - Sections 141; Municipalities Act - Sections 184; Tourist Trade Act

Reported in : 1999(2)BomCR535

Advocate for Respondent : C.A. Ferreira, A.G.A., ;G.V. Tamba, Standing Counsel, ;S.G. Dessai, S.A., ;S. Usgaonkar, ;A.N.S. Nandkarni, ;Mrs., A.A. Agni, ;S.D. Padiyar and ;S.D. Lotlikar, Advs.

ORDERR.K. Batta, J.1. In this Public interest litigation, directions of the Court are sought in relation to constructions put up by respondents No. 5 to 12 near Palolem Beach, Canacona, Goa in violation of Building Laws...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 30 1996

Smt. Maria Eduaria Apolonia Gonsalves e Mesquita, (deceased by L.R.'s) ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-30-1996

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 14 and 16; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rule 4; ;Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 20

Reported in : 1997(4)ALLMR36

Advocate for Respondent : J.P. Mulgaonkar, Adv.

Batta, J. 1. The controversy in all these appeals centers around the agreement for sale entered into between the parties on 9th March, 1977 in respect of urban property described in Conservatories of the Land Registration...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 2012

Raul Prazeres Vs. State of Goa, Through the Chief Secretary and Others

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : Sep-03-2012

Subject : Education

Oral Judgment: Heard Shri Sudesh Usgaonkar, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, Shri S. Narvekar, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents no.1 and 2, Shri D. Pangam, learned Counsel appearing for respondent no.3 and Shri...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial