Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s d dewani · Page 1 of about 3 results (0.038 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 24 2002

Prashant Vs. S.K. Sarkar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-24-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138 and 142; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD(Cri)953; 2002BomCR(Cri)672; 2002CriLJ3001; 2002(2)MhLj125

Advocate for Respondent : S.D. Dewani, Adv.

1. Heard Mrs. Shinde, learned Counsel for the applicant and Shri S.D. Dewani, learned Advocate for the non-applicant.2. The revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 04.12.2000 passed by the Vth Additional Sessions Judge,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 2016

Rattan India Power Limited Vs. The State of Maharashtra through the Ch ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : May-05-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. S.G. Jagtap

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a writ in the nature of certiorari and after setting aside adverse orders, a direction to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 04 2007

Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority and anr. Vs. Mahesh ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-04-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 6, 10(3), 10(4), 13(2), 13(3), 21, 21A, 25, 29, 29(3) and 33; Maharashtra Housing Area and Development Act, 1976 - Sections 173 and 177; Evidence Act - Sections 44; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 79, 80 and 96; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Evidence Rules

Reported in : 2007(4)ALLMR678; 2007(5)BomCR77; 2007(5)MhLj297

Advocate for Respondent : A.M. Ghare, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and ;S.Y. Deopujari, A.G.P. for Respondent No. 5

A.B. Chaudhari, J.1. By the present petition, which is under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (for short MHADA) has questioned the legality and validity of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial