Advanced Search Results

In Re: Bengal Luxmi Cotton Mills Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 145, 397 and 398; ;Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 88

Reported in : [1965]35CompCas187(Cal),69CWN137

Advocate for Respondent : Subimal C. Roy, ;S. Chaudhuri, ;R. Chaudhuri, ;B. Sen, ;M.K. Banerjee and ;P.K. Das, Advs.

B.C. Mitra, J.1. This is an application for various ad interim reliefs in a company petition under Sections 397, 398, 402 and 403 of the Companies Act, 1956. The material facts relating to this application are...

In Re: an Attorney

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Legal Practitioners Act, 1879 - Sections 5 and 13; ;Calcutta High Court (Original Side) Rules - Rules 5, 6 and 7

Reported in : AIR1955Cal113,58CWN880

Advocate for Respondent : Adv. General and ;S.M. Bose, amicus curiae

Chakravartti, C.J.1. By an order made on 4-5-1954, P. B. Mukharji, J. and myself directed a Rule to issue on 'Jalan & Co.', ostensibly a firm of solicitors practising in this Court, requiring them to show...

Md. Rajab UddIn Ahmed Vs. Numaligarh Refinery Limited and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 408; Conduct, Discipline and Appeal Rules - Rule 19; Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Sarma, Adv.

Ranjan Gogoi, J.1. An order, dated 31.7.2001 passed by the Advisor (HR), Numaligarh Refinery Limited, dismissing the writ petitioner from service has been put to challenge in the present writ application.2. The facts relevant to the...

Jahangir Alam Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Acts : Assam Elementary Education (Provincialisation) Rules, 1977 - Rule 3; Assam Secondary Education (Provincialisation) Rules, 1982 - Rule 7

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Sarma, Adv.

Ranjan Gogoi, J.1. The petitioners in this group of cases are teachers of different L.P./ M.E./M.V./High/Higher Secondary Schools of the state, who were appointed by the Managing Committee of the respective schools, which were already provincialised...

Kamala Sarkar Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Section 3, 3(1) and 3(3); ;Constitution of India - Articles 19, 22(5), 226, 226(1A) and 226(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : 2002CriLJ1414

Advocate for Respondent : Binod Kumar Gupta, ;Joymalya Bagchi and ;Kaushik Gupta, Advs. for Respondent No. 2

Satya Brata Sinha, J.1. In this writ application the petitioner has prayed for relese of her husband who has been detained in terms of an order dated 22-3-2000 issued by the Deputy Secretary to the Government...

Umesh Chandra Baishya Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Sharma, Adv.

Ranjan Gogoi, J.1. Aggrieved by what the writ petitioner contends to be an unjustified and arbitrary action of the Respondents Insurance Company in denying promotion to the petitioner from the post of Development Officer Grade-I to...

Prasanna Kumar Phukan Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Acts : Assam Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1994 - Rule 9(9)

Advocate for Respondent : H.K. Mahanta, Adv.

Ranjan Gogoi, J.1. Heard Mr. A.S. Chaudhury, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and Mr. H.K. Mahanta, learned Government advocate, Assam appearing on behalf of the official respondents.2. The punishment imposed on the petitioner by an...

McDonald's Corporation repr. by Its Attorney Ms. Shiela M. Lehr and Mc ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2(1), 10(1), 10(2), 8, 29, 30 and 33; Trade Marks Act, 1940 - Sections 29, 38 and 47

Reported in : ILR2007KAR3346; 2007(5)KarLJ638; LC2007(3)153; 2008(37)PTC247(Karn)

Advocate for Respondent : Udaya Holla, Sr. Adv. for Holla & Holla

V. Gopala Gowda, J.1. This appeal is filed by the unsuccessful plaintiffs in O.S. No. 11413/1998 questioning the correctness of the Judgment and Decree dated 15-10-2004 passed by the trial Court dismissing the suit of the...

Ashoka Marketing Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 237 and 249(1)

Reported in : [1967]37CompCas341(Cal),70CWN472

Advocate for Respondent : S. Choudary, ;B.N. Sen and ;B. Basak, Advs.

B.N. Banerjee, J.1. The petitioner-company claims to carry on business as exporter, investor and financier and further claims to have been acting as selling agent for the State Trading Corporation in respect of cement and also...

Apeejay Private Limited Vs. Uco Bank

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Education

ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE GA 234.OF 201.CS 14.of 2011 WITH GA 255.of 2011 APEEJAY PRIVATE LIMITED Versus UCO BANK BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date :17. h...