Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s chandra rao · Page 1 of about 6 results (0.157 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 22 2002

Bar Association Cuddapah Vs. Government of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-22-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Civil Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 11(1), 11(2), 21 and 21(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 7, 9(4) and 9(6)

Reported in : 2002(5)ALD345; 2002(5)ALT179

Advocate for Respondent : S. Chandra Rao, SC for HC, ;C.V. Njagarjuna Reddy and ;Bhaskaralakshmi, Advs. for Respondent No. 2, ;Jayanthi, SC Proddutur Advocate's Bar Association for Respondent No. 3 and ;Government Pleader for

Ar. Lakshmanan, C.J.1. Heard Sri M.R.K. Chowdary, learned senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner in WP No. 5647 of 2002, Sri M. Sudhir Kumar and Smt. B. Sudha, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners in WP...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 09 2002

M.A. Raoof Vs. A.P. High Court, Through Its Registrar General

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-09-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Explosives Substance Act - Sections 7 and 8; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 153A and 307; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 9(3), 9(4), 9(6), 11(1) and 268; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD(Cri)653; 2002(3)ALT324

Advocate for Respondent : S. Chandra Rao, S.C.

AR. Lakshmanan, C.J.1. The writ petition was filed by one Sri M.A. Raoof represented by Sri Mohd. Osman Shaheed, Advocate for a mandamus declaring the impugned order passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh vide...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 06 1998

B. Kistaiah Vs. Government of India and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-06-1998

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 226; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 12(A and E), 13 and 23; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109, 120-B, 199, 200, 201, 416, 419, 465 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1908 - Sections 164

Reported in : 1998(5)ALD135; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)466; 1998(4)ALT738

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. B. Adinarayana Rao, SC for Central Government, ;Mr. M.R. Reddy, SC for CBI, ;Mr. C.V. Rajeev Reddy, ;Mr. P. Kamalakar, ;Mr. Satyanarayana Rao, ;Mr. S. Janardhan Reddy and ;Mr. S. Leaoraj, Advs.

ORDERB. Sudershan Reddy, J 1. Both these writ petitions can be disposed of by a common order, as common questions arise for consideration. This is a tell tale story of unscrupulous litigants abusing the judicial process....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 07 2002

K. Venkatarao Vs. Government of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-07-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 13, 13(1), 13(2) and 18

Reported in : 2002(4)ALD269; 2002(2)ALD(Cri)94; 2002(4)ALT240

Advocate for Respondent : Government Pleader for Home, Counsel for Respondent No. 1; ;S. Chandra Rao, Standing Counsel for APHC, for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3

Ar. Lakshmanan, C.J. 1. Heard Mr. D. Ramalinga Swamy learned Counsel for the petitioner assisted by Ms. V. Malathi, Mr. Chandra Rao, learned Standing Counsel for the High Court and Mr. Rama Rao, learned Government Pleader...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 2002

Sk. Dastagiri Vs. District Judge and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-14-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : General Clauses Act - Sections 15; Constitution of India - Article 309; Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules - Rule 12

Reported in : 2002(5)ALT591

Advocate for Respondent : S. Chandra Rao, S.C. for High Court

ORDERAR. Lakshmanan, C.J.1. This writ petition is filed for the following relief:.......to issue a writ, order or direction especially one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring that revised notification No. 1/02 dated 29-1-2002 is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 01 1998

M. Rajaiah and ors. Vs. State Bank of India and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-01-1998

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21, 226, 232-A and 323-B; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 4, 7, 10, 18(1 and 3), 19(2 and 6), 25(B, F and H) and 36A; Industrial Dispute Central Rules - Rule 58; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 91 and 92; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 10(2)

Reported in : 1998(2)ALD180; 1998(2)ALT140

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. K. Srinivasa Murthy, Adv.

ORDER1. These writ petitons constitute a batch between the similarly placed petitioners in all respects and the common respondents. They also sprout out queries of synonymous lex and factum. The antonym is individual grievances among the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial