Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s c yadav · Page 1 of about 25 results (0.115 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 10 2004

Ambika Prasad Srivastava Vs. State Public Services Tribunal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-10-2004

Subject : ServiceCivil

Reported in : 2004(4)AWC3425; (2005)ILLJ818All

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. Yadav, C.S.C.

Pradeep Kant and K.S. Rakhra, JJ.1. Pradeep Kant and K. S. Rakhra, JJ.- Counter-affidavit filed today be placed on record.2. Heard Sri Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S. C. Yadav, learned counsel...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2012

State of Madhya Pradesh Through Ps- Gotegaon Vs. Chikki @ Chandramohan ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-16-2012

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2012CrLJ2046

M.A. SIDDIQUI, J. 1. Since both the appeals arise out of common judgment, hence they are being decided by this common judgment. 2. The State has filed Criminal Appeal No. 882/09 feeling aggrieved by the judgment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 2001

Mangali Prasad Pal Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-15-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Police Officers (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991; Uttar Pradesh Police Act, 1861 - Sections 7 - Rule 17; Constitution of India - Article 311; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 4(1), 157(1) and 173(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 307 and 308; Uttar Pradesh Police Regulations - Rules 43 to 50, 100 and 104

Reported in : 2001(2)AWC1139

Advocate for Respondent : C.S.C.

I. M. Quddusi, J.1. Since the petitions are knit together by reasons of common question of law being involved therein and also by reasons of facts being identical, these petitions were grouped together and heard accordingly...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 09 2008

State of U.P. and ors. Vs. K.P. Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-09-2008

Subject : Service

Reported in : [2008(117)FLR444]

U.K. Dhaon and Devi Prasad Singh, JJ.1. Heard Sri S.C. Yadav, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the petitioners and Sri S.K, Mehrotra, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite pasty No. 1,2. Being aggrieved by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 16 2004

Brajesh Misra Vs. Hon'ble High Court of Judicature and Anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-16-2004

Subject : Service

Reported in : [2005(107)FLR20]

Bhanwar Singh, J.1. Mr. Brajesh Misra is tlie son of an Additional District Judge, namely Shri J.C. Mishra who died in harness. He has sought for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 19 2013

Surya Narayan Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-19-2013

Subject : Education

1 M. Cr.C.No.1805/13. 19.6.2013. Shri S.C.Yadav learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Lalit Joglekar, learned P.L.for the respondents/ State. Heard on the question of admission. Petitioner has preferred this 4th repeat petition under Section 438 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 2012

Chintu Bai Vs. Bhura

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-30-2012

Subject : Education

F.A.No.808/2007 30.7.2012 Shri S.C.Yadav, learned counsel for the appellant. Respondent No.1 is reportedly dead. None for the proposed legal representatives of respondent No.1 mentioned in IA No.11737/11, although served. None for respondent Nos.2 to 8. Shri...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2004

Dinesh Kumar Shukla Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-31-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Public Servants (Reservation for SCs/STs/OBCs) Act, 1994 - Sections 3(6), 4, 5 and 11

Reported in : 2004(4)AWC3487

Advocate for Respondent : C.S.C.

Pradeep Kant and K.S. Rakhra, JJ.1. Heard Sri S. K. Kalia and Sri. S.C. Yadav, learned counsel for the State.2. By means of this petition, the petitioner Dinesh Kumar Shukla challenges the order dated 26.7.2003, by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 2011

Dharam Raj Singh S.O Late Lal Sahab Singh Vs. State of U.P. Thru Prin. ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-25-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : C.S.C.; Sudeep Seth, Advs

1. Heard Sri S.C. Yadav, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Sudeep Seth, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the record. 2. Affidavits have been exchanged between the parties.  3. With the consent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 2012

Awdesh Kumar Yadav Vs. Dr. Harisingh Gour Vishwa Vidyalaya Sagar

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-05-2012

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. C.A.Thomas

M.C.C.No.849/2012 5.9.2012 Shri S.C.Yadav, counsel for petitioner. Shri C.A.Thomas, counsel for respondent. This application is filed for restoration of W.P.No.7795/2012, which was dismissed in default on 20.6.2012 because of not appearance of the petitioner. It was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial