Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s c sharma · Page 1 of about 308 results (0.369 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 17 2005

Orient Paper Mills Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-17-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 1(3), 2 and 16; Carriers Act, 1965; Indian Railways Act; Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961; Apprentices Act, 1961; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960 - Sections 2(13); Indian Factories Act; Labour Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : [2006(109)FLR255]; (2006)ILLJ1136MP; 2006(1)MPLJ209

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. Sharma and ;Akash Mukerjee, Advs.

ORDERA.K. Shrivastava, J.1. By this petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought for quashment of order dated July 9, 1991 passed by respondent No. 1 (Annexure P/13)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2006

Kanchan Saxena S/O Shri R.S. Saxena Vs. the State of M.P. Through the ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-24-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI); Madhya Pradesh Lower Judicial Service (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1994 - Rules 5, 5(1) and 9(2); Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (General Conditions of Service) Rules, 1961; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : 2006(2)MPLJ312

Advocate for Respondent : Samdarshi Tiwari, Govt. Adv., ;S.C. Sharma, Sr. Adv., ;Abhay Pandey and ;Hemant Shrivastava, Advs.

ORDERA.K. Shrivastava, J.1. This order shall also govern the disposal of W.P. (S) No. 13439/2004 (Ashutosh Shukla v. State of M.P. and Anr.), W.P. (S) No. 13551/2004 (Prabendra Kumar Singh v. State of M.P. and Anr.)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 1996

Abdul Kalam Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-24-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : 1996IIIAD(Delhi)813; 63(1996)DLT809; 1996(38)DRJ459

K.S. Gupta, J.(1) CR. A 227/92 by Abdul Kalam and Cr. A 8/93 by Anwar @ Pappi are directed against the judgment and order both dt. 28.11.92 of an Additional Sessions Judge. In terms of that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 01 2000

Brijbasi Lime Works Vs. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-01-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 1(3)

Reported in : (2001)IILLJ1665MP

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. Sharma, Adv.

C.K. Prasad, J.1. In both the writ petitions, common questions of facts and law arise and as such they are being disposed of by this common order. :2. Facts which are necessary for decision of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2002

Sitabai Sinodia and ors. Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-22-2002

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 - Rules 47(7) and 47(8); Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 5 and 11

Reported in : [2002(94)FLR1016]; 2002(3)MPHT277; 2002(3)MPLJ116

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. Sharma, Adv.

ORDERBhawani Singh, C.J. 1. Shri Balram Prasad Sinodia (deceased) married Bindra Bai. Out of this wedlock, they had no child. He married Sita Bai Sinodia. Out of this marriage, there are three children : two sons...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 16 2003

M.P. Electricity Board Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and or ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-16-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 8 and 16(1)

Reported in : (2004)IILLJ40MP; 2004(1)MPLJ168

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. Sharma, Adv.

ORDERArun Mishra, J.1. Petitioner, Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board is challenging the order P. 11 passed by the Employees' Provident Fund Commissioner, directing to transfer amount to the 'Trust' for individual credit in employees' accounts, failing which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 14 2005

Devendra Kumar JaIn Vs. Hon'ble Administrative Judge, High Court of M. ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-14-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966 - Rule 14(5)

Reported in : [2005(105)FLR437]; 2005(1)MPHT269; 2005(1)MPLJ501

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. Sharma, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and ;S.K. Yadav, Govt. Adv. for Respondent No. 4

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. The petitioner was appointed as an LDC on 13-11-1970 by the District and Sessions Judge, Guna. In the year 1971 he was transferred from Guna, Biaora in the District Rajgarh which at the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 2003

Ashok D. Bhatia Vs. Managing Director, Food Corporation of India and o ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-14-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Food Corporation of India Contributory Provident Fund Regulations, 1967 - Regulation 27

Reported in : 2004(1)MPHT177

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Gupta, Sr. Adv., ;Rajnish Gupta, Adv. for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5, ;S.C. Sharma, Sr. Adv. and ;J.K. Pillai, Adv. for the Respondent No. 6

ORDERArun Mishra, J.1. In this writ petition, petitioner is assailing the action of the respondent Nos. 1 to 5; Food Corporation of India (hereinafter referred to as the 'FCI'), of making deduction of the employer's contribution...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 2002

Shri Narmada Enterprises and anr. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-01-2002

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2 and 34; Constitution of India - Article 226; Arbitration Act, 1940

Reported in : 2003(2)ARBLR420(MP); 2003(1)MPHT515; 2003(1)MPLJ511

Advocate for Respondent : Vivek Tankha, Sr. Adv. for Respondent No. 2 and ;S.C. Sharma, Adv. for Respondent No. 3

ORDERArun Mishra, J. 1. Petitioners are assailing the award (P-4) dated 24-12-2001 which has been made a Rule of the Court by Vth A.D.J., Bhopal as per order P-5. Main challenge is on the ground that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 02 2011

Dina Nath Dhawan and anr. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-02-2011

Subject : Education

Acts : The Pharmacy Act 1948 - Sections 31(a), 31(b), 31(c), 31(d), 2, 32(2), 42, 34

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R.P. Singh; Mr. S.C. Sharma; Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advs.

1. Since common questions of law and facts are involved in both the petitions, the same were taken up together for hearing and are being disposed of by a common judgment. However, in order to maintain...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial