Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s c rai · Page 1 of about 10 results (0.241 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 26 1999

Sanjay Kumar Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-26-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Reservation for SCs, STs and OBCs) Act, 1994 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 8 and 9; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 16, 21, 226, 341 and 342

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC406; (2000)1UPLBEC729

Advocate for Respondent : Shiv Kumar Singh, Adv. and ;S.C. Rai, Addl. Chief and ;S.C.

Palok Basu, J.1. Petitioner SanjayKumar Singh has come to this Courtunder Article 226 of the Constitutionof India with the prayer that theimpugned order dated30.6.1997/1.7.1997 passed by the U.P. Public Service Commission,Allahabad (for short Commission),copy of which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 2002

State of U.P. Vs. Girja and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-01-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302 and 307

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3582

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. Rai, ;A.D. Giri, ;S.B. Singh and ;G.P. Dixit, Advs.

U.S. Tripathi, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the State of U.P. against the judgment and order dated 28-2-1979 passed by Sri D.R. Singh, the then learned IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Ballia in Sessions Trial...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 1986

Ved Prakash Chaturvedi Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-23-1986

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1987(1)WLN358

Surendra Nath Bhargava, J.1. This is plaintiff's first appeal against the judgment and decree passed by the Additional District Judge, Dausa, dated 15-12-1979, dismissing the suit for declaration and arrears of salary.2. The plaintiff-appellant was appointed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 12 2000

Union of India Through General Manager, Northern Railway and Others Vs ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-12-2000

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 185, 205, 285, 287, 289 and 366; Uttar Pradesh Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1975 - Sections 3, 4, 18, 20, 24, 25, 52, 53, 59, 60 and 64; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 184 ; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 135; Punjab Municipal Act; New Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1994; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957; Factories Act, 1948; Uttar Pradesh Dookan Aur Vanijya Adhisthan Adhiniyam, 1956

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC732; (2001)1UPLBEC420

Advocate for Respondent : S.C., ;Arun Tandon, ;R.M. Saggi and ;V. Pratap, Advs.

Palok Basu, J.1. The issue in controversy is undoubtedly alive inspite of the three Constitution Bench decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court In re, Sea Customs Act, AIR 1963 SC 1760, D. G. Gouse, AIR 1980...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 1999

Harshardhan Mittal and Others Vs. U.P. State of Electricity Board and ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-29-1999

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 1910; Uttar Pradesh Government Electrical Undertakings (Dues Recovery) Act, 1958 - Sections 5; Haryana Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1979; Electricity Supply (Consumers) Regulation, 1984; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 79

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2603

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. and ;Sudhir Agrawal, Adv.

Palok Basu and R.K. Agrawal, JJ. 1. Those who are under liability to pay lacs and lacs of rupees as dues, may be electricity dues or otherwise. try to find out some way to thwart the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 27 2005

Raminder Son of Sri Servinder Singh Cheema and ors. Vs. the Vice-chanc ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-27-2005

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh State University Act, 1973 - Sections 37 and 49

Reported in : 2005(3)ESC1878

Advocate for Respondent : Govind Saran, ;Neeraj Tripathi, ;G.K. Singh and ;V.K. Singh, Advs. and ;S.C.

Rakesh Tiwari, J.1. Heard counsel for the parties and persued the record. The petitioners have filed this writ petition for issuance of a direction to the respondent-university to issue a degree of B. Tech. to them.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 2004

Kanhaiya Lal Bansal Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Aug-20-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 9, 21, 92, 95 and 96A; Bihar Factories Rule, 1950 - Rules 13, 102 and 139; Companies Act, 1956; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : [2006(3)JCR436(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : Anita Sinha, APP

ORDERS.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.1. Both these applications having been preferred by the same petitioner, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.In Cr. M.P. No. 800 of 2003 the petitioner has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2003

Smt. Mahendri Chhabra and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-22-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 9; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 16 and 21

Reported in : 2003(3)AWC2556; (2003)2UPLBEC1361

Advocate for Respondent : M.K. Gupta, ;R.K. Saxena, ;N.K.S. Yadav and ;S.C. Rai, Advs.

R.K. Agrawal, J.1. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners seek quashing of the notification Nos. 4266-Nau-9/2001-76 (1), 2001 dated 12.11.2001 and 4349-Nau-9/2001-76 (1)/2001, dated 12.11.2001, as also a writ of mandamus directing the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 2002

Suyash Kumar Srivastava and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-25-2002

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Procedure for Direct Recruitment for Group 'C' Posts (Outside the Purview of Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission) Rules, 1998 - Rules 4 and 5

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC865; (2002)2UPLBEC1322

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. and ;S.C. Rai, Adv.

S.K. Singh, J.1. By means of this writ petition, petitioners have prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 8.7.1999 (Annexure-7 to the writ petition) passed by respondent No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 2000

Stallion Shox Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-04-2000

Subject : SICALabour and Industrial

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 22; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10-A and 11; Constitution of India - Article 226; Timely Payment of Wages Act

Reported in : 2000(4)AWC2612; [2000(86)FLR801]; (2001)ILLJ103All

Advocate for Respondent : S.C., U.S. Awasthi and; S.C. Rai, Advs.

Palok Basu and Ratnakar Dash,JJ.1. M/s. Stallion Shox Limited has come up to this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the prayer that the citation dated 18.5.1999 Issued by the Tehsildar, Gautam...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial