Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s c mandhyan · Page 1 of about 9 results (0.059 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 07 2006

Sri Ajendra Singh, Vs. State of U.P. Through Its Secretary, Forest Dep ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-07-2006

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Forest Act - Sections 2; Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 21; Uttar Pradesh Establishment and Regulations of Saw Mills Rules, 1978 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7; Uttar Pradesh Establishment and Regulations (IInd Amendment) Saw Mill Rules, 1998 - Rules 2, 5 and 7; Uttar Pradesh Zila Parishad Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964

Reported in : AIR2006All227

Advocate for Respondent : S.C.

Saroj Bala, J.1. In all the writ petitions a common question of law about the grant/renewal of licence for operating saw-mills having been raised, they are being decided simultaneously.1. Writ Petition No. 36598 of 20042. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 1997

Leela Vs. Smt. Mukanda and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-11-1997

Subject : Contract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 10 and 20 and 20 (2); Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 157A

Reported in : 1998(1)AWC547

Advocate for Respondent : H.N. Sharma, ;R.K. Jain and ;R.B.D. Mishra, Advs.

A.K. Banerji, J. 1. This second appeal by defendant Leela is directed against the Judgment and decree passed by the two courts below decreeing the plaintiffs suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell against...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 2006

Cantonment Board Vs. Smt. Sudarshan Mala JaIn and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-25-2006

Subject : Contempt of Court

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC4098

D.P. Singh, J.1. Heard Sri R.N. Singh, senior advocate assisted by Sri Isa Khan for the applicant and Sri P.N. Saxena, senior advocate assisted by Sri Amit Saxena, learned Counsel for the opposite party.2. This contempt...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 20 2009

Raj Kumar Vs. Lal Khan (D) Through L.Rs.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-20-2009

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC3488

Poonam Srivastav, J.1. Heard Sri S.C. Mandhyan, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rlshi Chaddha advocate for the landlord/respondent.2. The landlord instituted a release application under Section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Act No. 13 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 1998

Chandra Prakash Arora Vs. District Judge, Saharanpur and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-07-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 145, 146 and 482; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1; Uttar Pradesh Act - Sections 10(6)

Reported in : 1998(2)AWC918; 1998CriLJ2846

Advocate for Respondent : A.G.A., ;B.D. Mandhyan and ;S.C. Mandhyan, Advs.

G.S.N. Tripathi, J.1. This writ petition has been filed by the admitted tenant of the property with several prayers including for (i) the quashing of the order dated 30.4.1997 passed by respondent No. 1 (Annexure-9 to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2002

Ansar Mehdi and anr. Vs. Iind Additional District Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-07-2002

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 43; Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106

Reported in : 2002(4)AWC3099

Advocate for Respondent : B.D. Mandhyan and ;Satish Mandhyan, Advs. and ;S.C. Mandhyan, S.C.

S.N. Srivastava, J.1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner prayed for quashing the judgment and decree dated 19.9.1986 passed by Judge, Small Causes Court, Amroha, decreeing the suit for ejectment and for arrears of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2006

Ram Kishan Vs. Ratan Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-16-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : 2006(2)AWC1819

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. Mandhyan, Adv. and ;Satish Mandhyan, S.C.

ORDERUmeshwar Pandey, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. In this petition the order of revisional court dated 1.12.2005 is under challenge. The revisional court has confirmed the order of trial court dated 25.3.2004 permitting an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2000

U. P. State Sugar Corporation Ltd. and Others Vs. Raza Buland Sugar Co ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-27-2000

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1971 - Sections 2 and 3; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Uttar Pradesh Sugar Undertakings Acquisition Ordinance, 1971; Sugar Undertakings (Takings over of Management) Act, 1978; Coal Mines Nationalisation Act, 1973 - Sections 2 and 4(1); Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 4(1); Textile Undertakings (Taking over of Management) Act, 1983 - Sections 3 and 3(2); Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 3(14), 109, 143 and 144

Reported in : 2000(4)AWC3403

Advocate for Respondent : B. D. Mandhyan, ;S. C. Mandhyan, ;Satish Mandhyan, ;U. N. Sharma and ;J. Nagar, Advs.

Sudhir Narain, J.1. These two cross-appeals have been filed against the judgment and decree passed by the trial court dated 18.8.1988 partly decreeing the suit in respect of certain properties involved in the suit and dismissed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 2002

U.P. State Sugar Corporation Vs. Labour Court and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-06-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 4K and 10; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(4)AWC3150; [2002(95)FLR350]

Advocate for Respondent : Mahima Maurya, ;U.K. Uniyal, ;S.C. Mandhyan and ;Arun Kumar Tiwari, Advs.

Anjani Kumar, J.1. Following reference was made to the labour court, Varanasi, which has been answered by the labour court by its award dated 16th May, 1997 in Adjudication Case No. 50 of 1992.^^D;k lsok;kstdksa }kjk...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial