Advanced Search Results
Manik Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai Aurangabad
Dec-21-2012
Criminal
A.H. Joshi, J. 1. Appellant herein was charged in Sessions Case No. 3 of 2004 by 4th Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, for pouring kerosene on his wife Sangita, setting her fire on 10.10.2003, at...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChandramohan Pandurang Kajbaje Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-07-2008
Service
Bombay Civil Services Classification and Recruitment Rules, 1939 - Rule 2(B); Constitution of India - Article 309
2008(1)BomCR705; JT2008(1)SC272; 2008(1)SCALE138; 2008(2)SLJ460(SC); 2008AIRSCW619; 2008LABIC779
S.K. Dholakia, Sr. Adv., ; Bharat Sanghal, ; Aparajita Singh
H.K. Sema, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 11.10.2000 of the Division Bench of the High Court of Bombay in Writ Petition No. 3024 of 1997.2. This case has a chequered...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshok Pandey, Advocate Vs. Satish Chandra Mishra (Presently, Advocate ...
Allahabad
Mar-03-2003
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 76, 124(2), 124(3), 132, 133, 134A, 145, 145(3), 165, 217(2) and 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 19, Rule 1
(2003)2UPLBEC1294
C.S.C.
Khem Karan, J.1. The present writ petition styled as Public Interest Litigation (for short P.I.L.) has been filed by a practicing lawyer of this Court, who by now is fairly known in the legal fraternity, at...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
State of Karnataka, Vs. Sheik Murad, S/O Vali Saheb, and ors
Karnataka
Oct-26-2010
Land Acquisition
Sri.K.S.A.Reddy; Sri.K.S.C.Gowda, Advs.
1. this appeal is filed by the State challenging the judgment dated 26.10.2004 passed by the X Additional City Sessions Judge, Bangalore in S.C.No.660/2001 acquitting the respondents of the offence under Sections 498-A and 304-B IPC...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Lord Krishna Sugar Mills Ltd. and anr. Vs. the Union of India and ...
Supreme Court of India
May-06-1959
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3; Sugar Export Promotion Act, 1958 - Sections 5 to 8; Sugar (Control) Order, 1955
AIR1959SC1124; [1960]1SCR39
ORIGINAl, JUTRISDICTION : Petitions Nos. 9 and 14,of 1959. Petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution of India for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. A.V. Viswanatha Sastri, and G. C. Mathur, for the petitioners in Petition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKirtan Sharatkumar Gandhi Vs. Gujarat Higher Secondary Education Board
Gujarat
Feb-09-1995
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226; Higher Secondary Certificate Examination Regulations, 1977 - Regulation 19A
AIR1995Guj217
M.C. Bhatta,; M.P. Prajapati, Advs. and; Y.M. Thakkar
ORDERN.N. Mathur, J.1. Rule.2. M. C. Bhatt waives service of Rule for respondents Nos. 1 and 2 and Mr. Y. M. Thakkar waives service for respondent No. 3.3. By was of this Special Civil Application under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC.P. Majhi Vs. Union of India and anr.
Orissa
Mar-14-2001
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227, 316 and 317
AIR2001Ori118
Sr. Standing Counsel (Central), ;A.B. Misra, ;C.R. Misra, ;G. Misra, ;T.K. Mandal and ;T.K. Misra, Advs. for the U.P.S.C.
A.S. Naidu, J.1. This writ application has its origin in a letter dated 3-9-97 written by Shri Chaitanya Prasad Majhi, Ex-Member of the Orissa Public Service Commission (for short 'the O. P. S. C.') to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn the Matter of a Reference by the Governor in Council Concerning Ref ...
Canada Supreme Court
Apr-25-2014
Education
The Court ” I. Introduction [1] The Senate is one of Canadas foundational political institutions. It lies at the heart of the agreements that gave birth to the Canadian federation. Yet from its first sittings, voices...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Murti Sharma and ors. Vs. Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking and or ...
Delhi
Feb-22-1994
Service
Delhi Municipal Corporation Act. 1957 - Sections 96; Central Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rule 30; Punjab Service of Engineers, Class 2, PWD (Irrigation Branch) Rules, 1941 - Rules 2, 4 and 5; Punjab Service of Engineers, Class 2, Public Witness.D. (Irrigation Branch) Rules, 1970
ILR1994Delhi477
C.M. Nayar, J. (1) The present writ petition raises the question of counting the ad hoc service of the petitioners from the date of such appointments for purposes of determining the seniority. The other questions of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn the Matter of a Reference by the Governor in Council Concerning Sec ...
Canada Supreme Court
Mar-21-2014
Land Acquisition
The Chief Justice and LeBel, Abella, Cromwell, Karakatsanis and Wagner JJ. ” I. Introduction [1] The Supreme Court Act provides that three of the nine judges of the Supreme Court of Canada must be appointed œfrom...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »