Advanced Search Results

J. Ashoka Vs. University of Agricultural Sciences and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 16 and 16(1)

Reported in : ILR2006KAR768; 2006(1)KarLJ258

Advocate for Respondent : B. Rudra Gowda, Adv. for Respondent-1 and ;G.S. Bhat and Associates for Respondent-3

ORDERB.S. Patil, J.1. In this writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the appointment of the 3rd respondent to the post of Assistant Professor of Sericulture. The 1st respondent-University has appointed respondent 3 herein vide order dated...

Krishnarao Alias Kamalakar Rao Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 - Sections 102, 176(6) and 321(3); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : ILR1999KAR314; 1999(1)KarLJ676

Advocate for Respondent : Sri M.N. Ramanjaneya Gowda, High Court Government Advocate and ;Sri G.S. Bhat, Adv.

ORDER1. By proceedings dated 14-8-1981 of the Administrator of the second respondent-Corporation, an extent of 215.39 sq. yards of vacant land was granted in favour of the petitioner and the matter was submitted to the Government...

Shivaji Yallappa Wagmode and Another Vs. Smt. Gangabai and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 and 151 - Order 41, Rule 6(2)

Reported in : 1998(5)KarLJ150

Advocate for Respondent : Sri N.S. Bhat ;for Sri R.B. Deshpande, Adv.

ORDER1. Heard Sri Rasheed Khan holding brief for Sri Vigneshwara Shastry, learned Counsel for the petitioners.2. This revision arises from the judgment and order dated 2-7-1994 passed by the I Additional Munsiff, Hubli, on an application...

Sri A. Viswanatha Pai Vs. Sri Vivekananda S. Bhat

Court : Karnataka

Subject : CriminalBanking

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 139; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 200

Reported in : ILR2009KAR171:2009(1)KCCR508:2009(2)AIRKarR186:AIR2009NOC1233:2009CriLJNOC429.

Advocate for Respondent : K. Chandrashekar Achar, Adv.

ORDERArali Nagaraj, J.1. The petitioner herein who is accused in C.C. No. 11091/2004 before the learned XVIACMM, Bangalore (herein referred to as 'Trial Court' for short) has challenged the legality and correctness of the judgment and...

Amar Singh Vs. Indian Tourism Development Corporation and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; ;Indian Tourism Development Corporation Conduct, Discipline and Appeal Rules, 1978 - Rule 23B

Reported in : 2004(1)JKJ158

Advocate for Respondent : S. Bhat, Adv.

Permod Kohli, J.1. Challenge is made to order dated 22-1-1999 passed by the appellate authority of the Indian Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. whereby appeal preferred by the petitioner against imposition of penalty by the disciplinary authority...

K.K. Govindaraju and Vs. Commissioner, Corporation of City of Bangalor ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 - Sections 301, 301(2), 302, 302(1) and 505; Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 - Sections 14, 76M, 307 and 308; Karnataka Municipal Corporations Amendment Act, 1986; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : ILR1987KAR1570

Advocate for Respondent : K.L. Manjunath, Adv. for R-1, ;A.J. Sadasiva, Adv. for R-2, ;H.B. Datar and ;G. Lingappa, Advs. for R-3, ;S.V. Jagannath, Government Adv. for State and ;G.S. Bhat, Adv.

Rama Jois, J.1. These four Writ Petitions have been referred to Division Bench under Section 9 of the Karnataka High Court Act. In the first three petitions, the petitioners who are residents of the City of...

N. Prabhat Pai Vs. Uppinangadi Grama Panchayathi and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : ILR1998KAR1277

Advocate for Respondent : B.M. Krishna Bhat, Adv. for R-3 and ;G. Balakrishna Shastry, Adv. for R-1 and 2

ORDERChandrashekaraiah, J.1.Uppinangadi Grama Panchayath (hereinafter referred to as the Panchayat) is the owner of the Stall No. 3 (New No. 4) situated in the New Bus Stand Uppinangadi, Puttur Taluk.2. The Panchayath issued a notification proposing...

Sri Vasudev S/O Malla Naik vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Right to Information

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 100189 OF 2025 (397 OF Cr.PC/438 OF...

Sri Madev S/O Malla Naik vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Right to Information

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 100189 OF 2025 (397 OF Cr.PC/438 OF...

Ravindran Pillai K. Vs. Kudremukh Iron Ore Company Limited and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 16

Reported in : 2002(4)KarLJ91

Advocate for Respondent : K. Subha Ananthi, Adv. for ;Kasturi Associates

A.M. Farooq, J.1. The petitioner was working in National Mineral Development Corporation (N.M.D.C.) from June 14, 1967 which was taken over by the first respondent-company and the petitioner was absorbed into the respondent-company on July 12,...