Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s b sen · Page 1 of about 76 results (0.177 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 26 1957

Shanti Swaroop Sharma Vs. B.R. Mandal and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-26-1957

Subject : ElectionConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 329; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 80 and 100

Reported in : AIR1957MP122

Advocate for Respondent : N.L. Shrivastava, Adv. and ;S.B. Sen, Govt. Adv.

ORDER1. Shri B. R. Mandlekar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.B. Sen, counsel for respondent No. 1 and Shri M.L. Shrivastava, counsel for respondents 3 and 9 present. Arguments completed.2. We proceed to pronounce our decision...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 1959

Laxman Pandharinath Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-09-1959

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 220, 309 and 311; Madhya Bharat Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1950

Reported in : AIR1959MP295

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Sen, Govt. Adv.

ORDER1. The order of the Court was delivered by Shrivastava J. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed by L. P. Hirway against the order of the State Government dated 5-8-1958 by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 1977

Sharif Ahmad and ors. Vs. Regional Transport Authority, Meerut and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-31-1977

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 136; Motor Vehicle Act, 1939 - Sections 43, 43A, 47, 47(3) and 57(3);Uttar Pradesh Motor Vehicle (Amendment) Act, 1972

Reported in : AIR1978SC209; (1978)1SCC1; [1978]1SCR761; 1977(9)LC719(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Kacker, ; B. Sen and ; Rani Arora, Advs.

N.L. Untwalia, J.1. In this batch of seven appeals by special leave the points involved are identical. It is a glaring example of unnecessary litigation between the various stage carriage operators, which could have been avoided...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 27 1974

Sarifan Bibi Vs. Dilwar HossaIn and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-27-1974

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 100 - Order 21, Rules 58 and 63; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 100

Reported in : AIR1975Cal221,79CWN282

Advocate for Respondent : Prasun Kumar Choudhury, ;S.B. Sen and ;Archana Roy, Advs.

Sengupta, J.1. This Second Appeal is against the decision of Sri S. N. Bhatta-charjee, Additional District Judge, 24 Par-ganas, in Title Appeal No. 1102 of 1969 affirming those of Sri B. P. Bose, Subordinate Judge, 5th...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 1959

National Transport Co. Vs. the State Transport Authority and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-10-1959

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 47 and 60; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR1959MP320

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Sen, Adv. for Respondent 2, ;M.N. Phadke and ;K.K. Dube, Advs. for Respondent 3

Shrivastava, J.1. This petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution has been filed against the order of the State Transport Authority dated 1-4-1958 confirming the order of the Regional Transport Authority dated 18-6-1957.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 23 1958

Bhojraj Vs. the State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-23-1958

Subject : Election

Acts : C.P. and Berar Municipalities Act, 1922 - Sections 20A(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1958MP286

Advocate for Respondent : M. Adhikari and ;S.B. Sen, Adv. and ;V.K. Sangi, Adv. for Opposite Party No. 3

ORDER1. This case comes before the Division Bench on a reference by Bhutt, J. The facts of the case sufficiently appear from the order of reference and need not be stated again. The reference involves consideration...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 1969

Balu Deochand Kulmi and anr. Vs. Fundibai Amichand Kulmi

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-19-1969

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Court-fees Act, 1870 - Sections 7

Reported in : AIR1972MP22

Advocate for Respondent : S.D. Sanghi, Adv.

S.P. Bhargava, J.1. This order shall also govern the disposal of the point referred to the Full Bench in civil revisions Nos. 497/66, 498/66 and 521/67. In this case and cases Nos. 497/66 and 498/66 reference...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 1978

Yeshwant Rao Vs. Sampat

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-25-1978

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2(1), 3(5), 19(2) and 23; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR1979MP21

Advocate for Respondent : K.L. Issarani, Adv.

G.P. Singh, C.J.1. This is a reference made by a Division Bench consisting of Hon'ble K. K. Dube, J. and Hon'ble J. P. Bajpai, J., referring to a Full Bench the following question:'Whether or not a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 1959

Mohanlal Ramsingh Thakur Vs. Chief Executive Officer, Corporation

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-13-1959

Subject : ConstitutionFood Adulteration

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 20(3); Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 16 and 20(1)

Reported in : AIR1962MP17

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. Dubey, Adv.

ORDERS.B. Sen, J. 1. This is an application by the applicant against his conviction under Section 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, and the sentence of fine of Rs. 50.2. The facts of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 1973

Dangalia and ors. Vs. Deshraj and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-30-1973

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 144; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR1974MP49; 1973MPLJ796

Advocate for Respondent : J.M. Sood, Adv.

Tare, C.J. 1. This is a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the order of the Board of Revenue, dated 31-12-1965 (Petitioners Annexure-D) passed in Revenue Revision No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial