Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s b mathur · Page 1 of about 104 results (0.088 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 17 1977

Roopchand Vs. NaraIn Singh and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-17-1977

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 1977WLN(UC)70

S.N. Modi, J.1. These three appeals are directed against the judgment of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Jodhpur Civil Misc. cases Nos. 33A, 34A and 35A of 1970. As these three appeals arise out of a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 1968

Mst. Sardaran and ors. Vs. Sunderlal Baldeo Prasad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-03-1968

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 61, 62, 63, 65, 90, 90(1) and 115; Uttar Pradesh Evidence (Amendment) Act, 1954 - 90(2); Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 139 and 142; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 103, 111 and 116; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 32, Rule 3

Reported in : AIR1968All363

Advocate for Respondent : R.N. Shukla and ;B.L. Shukla, Advs. for Respondents Nos. 3 and 2/1; ;S.B. Mathur, Adv. (As Guardian), for Respondents Nos. 2/2 and 2/8

1. This is a plaintiffs appeal arising out of a suit for possession and a sum of Rs. 200 claimed as damages. 2. Initially the suit was filed on 30th September, 1954 in the Court of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 2017

Patanjali Sharma vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-18-2017

Subject : Education

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.2979/2013 & CM Nos.5629/2013 & 5632/2013 + Reserved on:4. h September, 2017 Date of Decision:18. h September, 2017 PATANJALI SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through:...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 02 2001

Dr. A.K. Doshi Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-02-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : C.C.S. (C.C.A.) Rules, 1965 - Rule 14; Company Law Board (Qualifications, Experience and Other Conditions of Service of Members) Rules, 1993 - Rule 4; Central Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 - Sections 14 - Rules 6, 7, 10 and 13

Reported in : AIR2001SC1369; (2001)2CompLJ221(SC); [2001(90)FLR491]; JT2001(3)SC367; 2001LabIC1126; 2001(2)SCALE405; (2001)4SCC43; [2001]2SCR320; 2001(3)SLJ122(SC); (2001)2UPLBEC1535

S.N. Variava, J.1. Leave granted. 2. These three Appeals are directed against the Judgment dated 20th December, 1999 of the Delhi High Court. They are being disposed of by this common Judgment. In this Judgment parties...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 18 2003

K. Anbazhagan Vs. the Superintendent of Police and ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-18-2003

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2004CriLJ583; 2003(4)CTC609; JT2003(9)SC31; 2003(9)SCALE680; (2004)3SCC767; 2004(1)LC181(SC); AIR 2004 SC 524

Advocate for Respondent : K.V. Vishwanathan, ; Seema Bengani, ; N. Jothi, ;

ORDER DISMISSED)Sema, J.1. These two petitions have been preferred under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking transfer of CC No. 7 of 1997 and CC No. 2 of 2001 on the file of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 1987

Roshan Lal Tiwari Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-04-1987

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1989WLN(UC)446

G.M. Lodha, J.1. An unusual interesting case of the Prosecutor becoming the accused, for cheating and corruption offence, the total amount analysed being Rs. 33.50 has come to lime light in the criminal revision petitions filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2003

Shyama Charan Dash and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-11-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Orissa Industries Service Rules, 1985 - Rules 5, 7 and 7(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : AIR2003SC1936; [2003(97)FLR332]; JT2003(5)SC138; 2003(3)SCALE174; (2003)4SCC218; [2003]2SCR899; 2003(3)SLJ272(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Radha Shyam Jena, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and ; Raj Kumar Mehta, ;

D. Raju, J.1. The above appeal has been filed against the Order dated 26.8.1996 of the Orissa Administrative Tribunal, Bhubaneswar, in O.A. No. 777/91, whereunder the claim of the appellants before this Court and some others...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 16 2015

Steel Authority of India Limited Vs. Indian Council of Arbitration and ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-16-2015

Subject : Arbitration

1. This petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed by Steel Authority of India Limited (hereafter SAIL'), inter alia, praying as under:- (a) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 2007

S. Udaya Bhasker Reddy and ors. Vs. Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, R ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-07-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams Service Rules, 1989 - Rules 6, 9 and 9(1); Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1996 - Rules 33 and 35; Andhra Pradesh Ministerial Service Rules, 1998 - Rules 12, 15, 15(1) and 15(2); T.T.D. Employees' Service Rules, 1989 - Rules 4 and 9; Delhi High Court Staff (Seniority) Rules, 1971 - Rule 5; Delhi High Court Establishment (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1972; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : 2007(6)ALT162

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Jayaprakash Rao and ;Karanam Ramesh, Advs. in W.P.No.26242 of 2006, ;A.K. Jayaprakash Rao, ;Y.V. Ravi Prasad and ;Karanam Ramesh, Advs. in W.P. No. 9908 of 2007

C.V. Ramulu, J.1. In these two Writ Petitions, common question of law and fact arise for consideration; therefore, they are being disposed of by this common Order.2. The only question that arises for consideration in these...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 2001

A.K. Mahajan and ors. Vs. the Chief Justice and ors. Overruled

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-01-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 16(1), 226, 229, 229(2) and 309; Delhi High Court Establishment (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1972 - Rule 7

Reported in : 2001IVAD(Delhi)807; 90(2001)DLT468

C.K. Mahajan, J.1. These petitions are filed by Private Secretaries of the Delhi High Court challenging the Notification dated 7.8.1995 making amendment in Schedule II of the Delhi High Court Establishment (Appointment and Conditions of Service)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial