Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s b bhapkar · Page 1 of about 27 results (0.044 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 04 1999

Rajendra Narayanrao Suryawanshi and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtr ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-04-1999

Subject : Election

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 73-G(1); Maharashtra Specified Co-operative Societies (Election to Committee) Rules, 1971 - Rules 5, 5.2, 6, 7, 16(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR2000Bom82; 1999(4)ALLMR8; 2000(1)BomCR902; (2000)2BOMLR908; 1999(3)MhLj876

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Bhapkar A.G.P., and ;P.B. Shirsath, Advs.

ORDERR.G. Deshpande, J.1. Heard Shri R.N. Dhorde with Shri V.D. Hon, thelearned Counsel for the petitioners; Shri S.B. Bhapkar, the learned A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 and Shri P.B. Shirsath, Adv. for respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 26 1992

Shivraj S/O. Hanmantrao Patil Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-26-1992

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 48A; Maharashtra Prisoners Punishment Rules, 1963 - Rule 5

Reported in : 1993(3)BomCR717

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Bhapkar, A.P.P.

N.P. Chapalgaonker, J.1. Heard Shri V.G. Sakolkar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri S.B. Bhapkar, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner herein challenges punishment inflicted on him for the overstay when...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 1999

indur Varun Shankar Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-16-1999

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Maharashtra Govt. Rules for Admission to M.B.B.S. & B.A.M.S. Courses, 1997-98 - Rules 4.4 and 4.5; Maharashtra Govt. Rules for Admission to M.B.B.S. & B.A.M.S. Courses, 1994-95 - Rules 3.3.1 and 3.3.2; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2000Bom13; 1999(4)ALLMR374; 2000(2)BomCR810; 1999(3)MhLj802

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Bhapkar, A.G.P. and ;R.N. Dhorde, Adv.

ORDERS.B. Mhase, J.1. Heard Shri A.H. Kasliwal, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Shri S.B. Bhapkar learned A.G.P. for respondent No. 1 and Shri R.N. Dhorde, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 2. 2. Rule. By consent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 15 2006

Shri Vaijanath S/O. Tatyarao Shinde Vs. the Secretary, Marathwada Shik ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-15-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - Sections 5, 5(1) and 5(5); Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act - Sections 16F and 16E; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Rules, 1981 - Rules 2(1), 3, 3(1), 6 and 12

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR823; 2006(6)BomCR804; 2006(6)MhLj682; 2007(4)AIRKarR665(FB)(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : A.B. Tele, Adv. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and ;S.B. Bhapkar, Adv. for respondent No. 2

ORDERA.P. Deshpande, J.1. A conflict in the views expressed by two Division Benches of this Court was noticed by one of us and hence, a reference was made to the Honourable the Chief Justice with a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 1996

Sukhdeo Mahadu Ghumare Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-10-1996

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1997)99BOMLR108

V.K. Barde, J.1. The appellant who is convicted and sentenced for the offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, in Sessions case No. 47/1990, by the Additional Sessions Judge, Beed, has preferred this appeal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2011

The State of MaharashtrA. Vs. Iqbal So Karim Ansari.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-15-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 325, 323, 504, 498-A.

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. S.B. Bhapkar

1 Heard respective learned counsel for the parties. 2 This is an appeal preferred by the appellant/State i.e. original complainant challenging the judgment and order of acquittal, th dated 1.12.2000, rendered by the learned 4 Judicial...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 04 2003

Subhadra Bai and ors. Vs. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-04-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2, 2(1), 3 and 3(1), 4 and 4A

Reported in : II(2004)ACC253; 2005ACJ1574

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Joshi, Adv.

D.S. Zoting, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 26.8.1985, passed by the Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation Cases, Latur in Application No. 1 of 1983, whereby the application filed by the present appellants...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2009

Fatima W/O Kasam Saheb Bagwan Since Deceased (Through L.Rs. Abdul Kasa ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-06-2009

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 11A, 21 and 45(2)

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR532; 2009(111)BomLR2022; 2010(1)MhLj142

Advocate for Respondent : D.V. Tele, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2

P.R. Borkar, J.1. These two Writ Petitions raise basic question whether Fatima Kasam Bagwan who died pending these petitions and her son Abdul Aziz were holding surplus land within the meaning of provisions of the Maharashtra...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 1993

Dattugir Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-13-1993

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950

Reported in : AIR1994Bom372; 1994(1)BomCR476

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Bhapkar, Adv.;A.B. Naik and;V.D. Gunale and;V.G. Sakolkar, Advs.

ORDERKamat, J. 1. Mud slinging, and that also in indecent and non-legal language, frequently resorting to slang has a con-sequence of forfeiture of the right of the petitioner to the very hearing in Court in a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 02 2000

Madhav Bapurao Wagh Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-02-2000

Subject : Election

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 3, 73-G, 112-A, 73-ID, 146, 147 and 160-A

Reported in : 2000(4)BomCR465; 2000(3)MhLj853

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Bhapkar, A.G.P. and ;B.N. Patil, Adv.

ORDERA.V. Savant, J.1. Heard all the learned Counsels; Shri Suryawanshi for petitioner. Shri Bhapkar, Assistant Government Pleader for respondents Nos. 1 to 4 and Shri Patil for respondents Nos. 7 and 13. 2. The short point...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial