Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Parvati Kuwar and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80, 100 and 101 - Order 21, Rules 58 and 63; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 46(2); Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 278, 279 and 280; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 11

Reported in : AIR1965All154

Advocate for Respondent : S.B.L. Gaur, Adv.

S.N. Katju, J. 1. This a defendant's appeal arising out of a suit for declaration that the plaintiffs are the owners of the house in dispute and it was not liable to be sold in discharge...

Baburao and Etc. Vs. the Collector, District Parbhani and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Acts : Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 - Sections 55; Constitution of India - Article 226; Maharashtra Municipalities (Conduct of Business) Rules, 1966 - Rule 34; Maharashtra Municipalities (Elections to Subjects Committees) Rules, 1966 - Rule 38; Maharashtra Municipalities (President Election) Rules, 1981- Rules 6 and 7; Municipal Councils (Co-option of Councillors) Rules, 1967 - Rule 7(4); Bombay Village Panchayat (Sarpanch and Upsarpanch) Election Rules, 1964

Reported in : AIR1997Bom49; (1996)98BOMLR567

Advocate for Respondent : E.P. Sawant, Asstt. Govt Pleader, ;S.C. Bora, ;V.J. Dixit, ;A.B. Naik, ;N.N. Shinde and ;S.B. Talekar, Adv.

ORDERChapalgaonkar, J.1. These writ petitions challenge proceedings of a special meeting of Parbhani Municipal Council held on 6-11-1995. The special meeting was called to consider vote of no confidence against President of the Council. 2. Shri...

Mirza Mahmood S/O Hidayat Baig Since Deceased Through His Legal Heirs ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Hyderabad Civil Services (Safeguarding of National Security) Rules, 1954 - Rule 3

Reported in : 2001(3)BomCR571

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Gosavi, A.G.P. for the Respondents No. 1 and 4 and ;D.R. Irale Patil, Adv. for Respondents No. 2 and 3

V.K. Barde, J.1. This petition is filed by the legal representatives of Shri Mirza Mahmood s/o. Hidayat Baig who died on 3-1-1988. Shri Mirza Mahmood s/o. Hidayat Baig was working as primary teacher in the erstwhile...

City Montessori School Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 6(1), 40, 40(1), 44B, 48, 48(1), 48(2) and 48(3); Land Acquisition (Companies) Rules, 1963; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : 2009(2)ALD1142(SC); 2009(2)SCALE740:2009(2)LHSC841:2009(3)JT16

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Upadhyay, Sr. Adv., ; Manish Misra, ; Sanjay R. Hegde

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Appellant runs an educational institution situated at 11, Station Road in the town of Lucknow. The premises belong to one Smt. Urmila Bhalla and Smt. Sheela Kapoor. It measured 23,000 sq....

indur Varun Shankar Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Maharashtra Govt. Rules for Admission to M.B.B.S. & B.A.M.S. Courses, 1997-98 - Rules 4.4 and 4.5; Maharashtra Govt. Rules for Admission to M.B.B.S. & B.A.M.S. Courses, 1994-95 - Rules 3.3.1 and 3.3.2; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2000Bom13; 1999(4)ALLMR374; 2000(2)BomCR810; 1999(3)MhLj802

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Bhapkar, A.G.P. and ;R.N. Dhorde, Adv.

ORDERS.B. Mhase, J.1. Heard Shri A.H. Kasliwal, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Shri S.B. Bhapkar learned A.G.P. for respondent No. 1 and Shri R.N. Dhorde, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 2. 2. Rule. By consent...

Sikhar Gupta Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Reported in : (2005)1UPLBEC429

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Pandey, Adv., ;S.P. Singh, S.C., ;M.C. Chaturvedi, A.C.S.C. and ;S.C.

R.B. Misra, J.1. Heard Sri S.C. Verma, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri M.C. Chaturvedi, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel alongwith Sri S.B. Pandey and Sri S.P. Singh, learned Standing Counsel.2. In the petition prayer has...

Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Bihar Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1960 - Sections 27A(1), 27A(7), 27A(8), 27AA and 27B; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 142 and 226; ;Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 129E; ;Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 16(2), 30 and 46(1); ;Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F

Reported in : 2004(176)ELT48(SC); [2004(1)JCR88(SC)]; 2003(9)SCALE823; (2003)11SCC40

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Sanyal, Sr. Adv. and ; Sunil Roy, Adv.

Brijesh Kumar, J.1. The appellant, in the above noted Civil Appeals No. 8274-8292 of 2001 is a 'Company' registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 and has a sugar factory situate in Harinagar, District West Champaran...

Anil Ritolla @ A.K. Ritolia Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bihar Finance Act, 1981; Bihar Sales Tax Act; Bihar Sales Tax Rules - Rules 14 and 12(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 23, 24, 34, 384, 415, 420 and 427; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Reported in : 2008CriLJ353; JT2007(7)SC147; 2007(11)SCALE401; (2007)10SCC110; 2007AIRSCW6332; (2007)4Crimes44(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Upadhyay, Sr. Adv., ; Mohit Kumar Shah, ; Gopal Singh

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Parties hereto admittedly had been carrying on commercial transactions. Appellant herein was an authorised dealer of Hindustan Lever Limited. In connection with the said business transactions, appellant allegedly was required to...

Ram Dayal Rai Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : AIR2005SC1920; 2005(2)BLJR918; [2005(105)FLR160]; [2006(1)JCR240(SC)]; JT2005(3)SC130; (2005)IILLJ690SC; (2005)3SCC501; 2005(2)SLJ481(SC); (2005)2UPLBEC1609

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Upadhyay, ; Pawan Upadhyay, ; Shiv Mangal Sharma an

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 10.4.2003 passed by the High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi in L.P.A. No. 88 of 2003 dismissing the appeal filed by...

Employers in Relation to the Management of Sudamdih Colliery of Bharat ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 10; ;Contract Labour Regulation and Abolition Act - Sections 10, 10(1) and 10(2)

Reported in : AIR2006SC946; 2006(2)ALD25(SC); 2006(1)BLJR197; [2006(1)JCR250(SC)]; JT2006(1)SC411; (2006)ILLJ820SC; 2006(1)SCALE284; (2006)2SCC329; 2006(3)SLJ428(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Upadhyay, ; K.L. Das and ; Shiv Mnagal Sharma, Advs

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Appellant calls in question the legality of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Patna High Court upholding the judgment of the learned Single Judge. By the said judgments certain persons...