Advanced Search Results
Trimbakrao Mugutrao Deshmukh Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.
Mumbai
Oct-24-2008
Property
Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 27, 28, 29, 29(1) and 29(2); Civil Procedire Code - Sections 36(4) and 80; Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Lowering of Ceiling on Holdings) Distribution of Surplus Land and (Amendment) Rules, 1975 - Rule 12; Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Lowering of Ceiling on Holdings) (Distribution of Surplus Land) and (Amendment) Rules, 2001; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
2009(2)BomCR467
S.B. Ahirkar, A.G.P.
Rohee K.J., J.1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties.2. The petitioner has moved the present writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking direction...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarikant Ramnarayan Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Mumbai
Apr-05-2007
Service
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 125, 126 and 126(1); Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 192, 209, 240, 246(1), 252, 254, 255(1), 255(2), 256(1), 257, 475 and 475(1); Criminal Code and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3, 4 and 5; Air Force Law; Army Rules - Rule 125
2007(5)MhLj419
S.B. Ahirkar, Adv.
D.D. Sinha, J.1. Heard Shri S.A. Jaiswal, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri S.B. Ahirkar, learned Counsel for the respondents.2. Rule. Heard forthwith by consent of the learned Counsel for the parties.3. The question which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVasant Hiraji Kaddo Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Oct-08-2008
Service
Constitution of India - Article 226; Secondary School Code - Rule 70.1; Revised Pension Rules, 1950
2008(6)ALLMR638; 2009(1)BomCR743
S.B. Ahirkar, A.G.P.
Rohee K.J., J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks (i) quashing of the communication dated 4.1.1998 made by under Secretary, Government of Maharashtra (respondent No. 1) to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Akole Taluka Education Society and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...
Mumbai
Jan-19-2016
Education
Common Judgment: (M.S. Sonak, J.) 1. Rule in each of the petitions. With the consent of and at the request of the learned counsel for the parties, Rule is disposed of finally. 2. The learned counsel...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMessrs. Aadya Motor Car Company Private Limited Vs. The Municipal Comm ...
Mumbai Nagpur
Oct-07-2014
Education
C.V. Bhadang, J. 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. The petition is heard finally with the consent of the parties. 2. In this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.I.D.C. Prakalpgrast Majur Kamgar and Another Vs. Amravati District L ...
Mumbai Nagpur
Jun-09-2016
Education
Shri. A.M. Ghare
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. By these writ petitions the petitioners have challenged the legality and correctness of the order dated 11.1.2016 passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAakash @ Golu and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai Nagpur
Feb-01-2016
Criminal
Oral Judgment: (V.M. Deshpande, J.) 1. The appellants suffered conviction for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and they are ordered to suffer sentence for life imprisonment...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Maharashtra, Through Central Bureau of Investigation, Special ...
Mumbai Nagpur
Jul-16-2012
Land Acquisition
1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order dt.19.9.1997 passed in Special Case No.16 of 1992 by the learned Special Judge, Anti Corruption, Nagpur whereby the respondent/accused Padmakar Dandekar was acquitted of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Maharashtra, Through Central Bureau of Investigation, Special ...
Mumbai Nagpur
Jul-16-2012
Land Acquisition
1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order dt.19.9.1997 passed in Special Case No.16 of 1992 by the learned Special Judge, Anti Corruption, Nagpur whereby the respondent/accused Padmakar Dandekar was acquitted of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJaved S/O Edirish Memon Vs. Syndicate Bank, Through Its General Manage ...
Mumbai Nagpur
Jul-11-2013
Land Acquisition
Shri. Anilkumar
Oral Judgment: (A.S. Chandurkar, J.) 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith and heard by consent of the parties. 2. Heard Shri Parsodkar for the petitioner, Shri Anilkumar Advocate for respondent nos.1 and 2 and Shri...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »