Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s b ahirkar · Page 1 of about 23 results (0.052 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 24 2008

Trimbakrao Mugutrao Deshmukh Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-24-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 27, 28, 29, 29(1) and 29(2); Civil Procedire Code - Sections 36(4) and 80; Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Lowering of Ceiling on Holdings) Distribution of Surplus Land and (Amendment) Rules, 1975 - Rule 12; Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Lowering of Ceiling on Holdings) (Distribution of Surplus Land) and (Amendment) Rules, 2001; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2009(2)BomCR467

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Ahirkar, A.G.P.

Rohee K.J., J.1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties.2. The petitioner has moved the present writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking direction...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 2007

Harikant Ramnarayan Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-05-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 125, 126 and 126(1); Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 192, 209, 240, 246(1), 252, 254, 255(1), 255(2), 256(1), 257, 475 and 475(1); Criminal Code and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3, 4 and 5; Air Force Law; Army Rules - Rule 125

Reported in : 2007(5)MhLj419

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Ahirkar, Adv.

D.D. Sinha, J.1. Heard Shri S.A. Jaiswal, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri S.B. Ahirkar, learned Counsel for the respondents.2. Rule. Heard forthwith by consent of the learned Counsel for the parties.3. The question which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 08 2008

Vasant Hiraji Kaddo Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-08-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Secondary School Code - Rule 70.1; Revised Pension Rules, 1950

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR638; 2009(1)BomCR743

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Ahirkar, A.G.P.

Rohee K.J., J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks (i) quashing of the communication dated 4.1.1998 made by under Secretary, Government of Maharashtra (respondent No. 1) to the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 19 2016

Akole Taluka Education Society and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-19-2016

Subject : Education

Common Judgment: (M.S. Sonak, J.) 1. Rule in each of the petitions. With the consent of and at the request of the learned counsel for the parties, Rule is disposed of finally. 2. The learned counsel...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2014

Messrs. Aadya Motor Car Company Private Limited Vs. The Municipal Comm ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Oct-07-2014

Subject : Education

C.V. Bhadang, J. 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. The petition is heard finally with the consent of the parties. 2. In this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 09 2016

M.I.D.C. Prakalpgrast Majur Kamgar and Another Vs. Amravati District L ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Jun-09-2016

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. A.M. Ghare

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. By these writ petitions the petitioners have challenged the legality and correctness of the order dated 11.1.2016 passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 01 2016

Aakash @ Golu and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Feb-01-2016

Subject : Criminal

Oral Judgment: (V.M. Deshpande, J.) 1. The appellants suffered conviction for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and they are ordered to suffer sentence for life imprisonment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 2012

State of Maharashtra, Through Central Bureau of Investigation, Special ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Jul-16-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order dt.19.9.1997 passed in Special Case No.16 of 1992 by the learned Special Judge, Anti Corruption, Nagpur whereby the respondent/accused Padmakar Dandekar was acquitted of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 2012

State of Maharashtra, Through Central Bureau of Investigation, Special ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Jul-16-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order dt.19.9.1997 passed in Special Case No.16 of 1992 by the learned Special Judge, Anti Corruption, Nagpur whereby the respondent/accused Padmakar Dandekar was acquitted of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2013

Javed S/O Edirish Memon Vs. Syndicate Bank, Through Its General Manage ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Jul-11-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Anilkumar

Oral Judgment: (A.S. Chandurkar, J.) 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith and heard by consent of the parties. 2. Heard Shri Parsodkar for the petitioner, Shri Anilkumar Advocate for respondent nos.1 and 2 and Shri...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial