Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s a hussain · Page 1 of about 1,521 results (0.333 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 21 1998

Bibi Shahnaz Alias Munni Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Aug-21-1998

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Muslim Women (Protection of Right on Divorce) Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 4, 4(1), 279 and 300; Delhi Rent Control Act - Sections 14A and 25A; Slum Area Clearance Act; Constitution of India - Articles 245, 246, 312 and 324; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125 and 125(1); Mohammedan Law; Muslim Personal Law; Islamic Law

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Nayyar Hussain and S. Qaider Hasan and Abbas Haider, Advs. for Respondent No. 2

M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. In this case a very interesting point of law is involved regarding right of a divorced wife to claim maintenance in a proceeding under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 1998

Bibi Shahnaz @ Munni Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Aug-21-1998

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125; Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 - Sections 3 and 4

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Nayyar Hussain, S. Qaider Hasan and Abbas Haider, Advs. for Respondent No. 2

M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. In this case a very interesting point of law is involved regarding right of a divorced wife to claim maintenance in a proceeding under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 1996

Smt. Sona Devi Vs. Nagina Singh and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Mar-20-1996

Subject : Property

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Article 64; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 91 and 92; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 31

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Ashgar Hussain, Sr. Adv. and Nawal Kishore Sharma, Adv.

B.L. Yadav, J. 1. Whether the suit of the plaintiff-respondent was within time and whether Sections 91 and 92 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (compendiously the Act) have been correctly interpreted and whether the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 09 1985

Gulam Nabi Zarkob Vs. Gulam Rasool and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : May-09-1985

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 100; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105 and 111

Reported in : AIR1986J& K8

Advocate for Respondent : S.T. Hussain, Adv.

M.L. Bhat, J. 1. This is a civil second appeal. As required under Section 100 of the Amended C.P.C., the following question of substantial importance was formulated by this Court for determination on 26-12-1984 when the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 01 2004

State of J and K and ors. Vs. Zamindaran of Villages Khanpora and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Nov-01-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Section 54; ;Court-fee Act - Section 149; ;Court-fee Rules; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 148

Reported in : 2005(1)JKJ241

Advocate for Respondent : S.T. Hussain, Adv.

H. Imtiyaz Hussain, J.1. The present application has been filed by the State of Jammu and Kashmir through Principal Secretary to Government Industries and Commerce Department Srinagar with the prayer that they be allowed to deposit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 1997

Sinha K.C. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Dec-02-1997

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 88 and 92; Factories Rules, 1950 - Rule 36; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Advocate for Respondent : S.Y. Hussain, Adv.

N.K. Sinha, J. 1. Heard Sri P.N. Pandey learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.Y. Hussain, learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is the Manager of M/s. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Company...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 2003

Kamla Kant Jha Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jul-14-2003

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 - Sections 92

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Ghose, Sr. Adv., AAG 2, S.S. Naiyar Hussain, GP 2 and C.K.P. Bhagat, SC 1

Ravi S. Dhavan, CJ., Shashank Kumar Singh, J.1. The Court is not repeating any aspect in any of orders recorded in this case. Suffice it to say that they have been sufficiently brought to the notice...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 2006

Kameshwar Lall Dass Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Aug-17-2006

Subject : Civil

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Asghar Hussain, Sr. Adv. and B.K. Singh Chauhan, Adv. for Respondent No. 2, G.P. VIII, Ganesh Prasad Singh, Sr. Adv. and Rajnikant Jha, Adv. for Respondent No. 5

Aftab Alam, J. 1. Heard Mr. Y.V. Giri, Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner, Mr. S.S. Asghar Hussain, Senior Advocate representing the Bihar State Marketing Board and Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, Senior Advocate appearing on behalf...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 1993

Bibi Khurshid and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Mar-15-1993

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bihar Tenancy Act, 1885 - Sections 69

Advocate for Respondent : R.C. Ram, S.C. and S.S. Ashagar Hussain and S.S. Nayar Hussain

S.B. Sinha, J. 1. This application is directed against an order dated 4-11-1991 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Bikramganj (Respondent No. 3), whereby he refused to take action on their application purported to be under Section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2003

Md. Halim Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Apr-28-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Laws

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Naiyer Hussain, G.P. 2

Ravi S. Dhavan, C.J. and R.N. Prasad, J. 1. The delay is condoned. 2. As the writ petition was sans details, the learned Judge dismissed the writ petition with the following order: 'Heard Mr. Md. Kamran...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial