Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: rita kohli · Page 1 of about 42 results (0.052 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 24 2004

Kotah Rubber Industries Limited Vs. Assistant Excise and Taxation Comm ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-24-2004

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 21(1) and 21(2)

Reported in : [2004]137STC460(P& H)

Advocate for Respondent : Rita Kohli, Deputy Adv.-General

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. This petition involves adjudication of the petitioner's challenge to notice, annexure P2, dated February 17, 1984 issued by the Assistant Excise and Taxation Commissioner (Inspection), Jullundur (hereinafter described as 'the revisional authority') for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2004

Dr. Ved Parkash Pathak Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-07-2004

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Punjab Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1970 - Rules 5, 8 and 9; Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : (2004)136PLR663

Advocate for Respondent : Rita Kohli, D.A.G.

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. Removal from service is one of the major penalties specified in Clause (viii) of Rule 5 of the Punjab Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1970 (for short, the Rules') which the government...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 27 2004

Smadh Bawa Maru Dass Vs. the Financial Commissioner, Appeals and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-27-2004

Subject : ConstitutionTenancy

Acts : Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953 - Sections 18; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226

Reported in : (2004)137PLR348

Advocate for Respondent : Rita Kohli, D.A.G. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2

G.S. Singhvi, J1. These petitions are directed against order dated 11.10.1983 passed by Financial Commissioner, Appeals, Punjab (respondent No. 1) vide which he allowed the revision petitions filed by Shri Bhagat Singh (respondent), who died during...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 25 2004

Atma Singh and ors. Vs. Additional Director, Consolidation of Holdings ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-25-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 - Sections 42

Reported in : (2004)137PLR578

Advocate for Respondent : Rita Kohli, D.A.G. for Respondent No. 1 and;None for Remaining Respondents

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. (25th February, 2004) - This petition is directed against order dated 26.10.1983 passed by Additional Director, Consolidation of Holdings, Punjab, Camp at Rajpura (respondent No. 1) vide which he accepted the petition filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 2004

Gurbachan Singh Bachi Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-11-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 -Schedule - Article 102; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 10(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 16; Central Act; State Re-organisation Act, 1956 - Sections 115(7); Limitation Act, 1908; Constitution of India - Articles 102, 311(2) and 314; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment); Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 - Rules 10(3), 10(4), 10(5) and 12(4)

Reported in : 2005(3)SLJ221(P& H)

Advocate for Respondent : Rita Kohli, Deputy Adv. General for Respondent No. 1, and; N.S. Boparai, Adv. for Respondent No. 2

S.S. Saron, J.1. What are the consequential benefits payable to the petitioner after his removal as Administrative Member of the Punjab State Electricity Board ('Board' for short) as been set aside, is the question that requires...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2005

Dharam Singh Gill Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-16-2005

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (2005)140PLR669

Advocate for Respondent : Rita Kohli, D.A.G.

Harjit Singh Bedi, J.1. This is an unfortunate and pitiable case. The petitioner is an old man of 85 years, a political sufferer and almost blind. He has been denied a freedom fighter pension as he...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 2003

Maya Construction Company and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-22-2003

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 19(1)

Reported in : AIR2004P& H35; (2004)136PLR33

Advocate for Respondent : Rita Kohli, Deputy Adv. General for respondent No. 1 and; H.S. Sethi, Adv. for respondent No. 2 in C.

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. With a view to deal with the problems of Cooperative Labour and Construction Societies, Government of Punjab vide notification dated 9.8.1979 (Annexure Rl) in CWP No. 5998 of 2000) constituted a Board consisting...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 2013

Dr. Alka Sehgal Vs. Dr. Gurjit Kaur

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-15-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Criminal Misc. not M. 3017 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. not M. 3017 of 2012 Decided on 15 .03.2013. Dr. Alka Sehgal ... Petitioner versus Dr. Gurjit Kaur...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 2013

Date of Decision: April 2, 2013 Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-02-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.26229 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.26229 of 2012 DATE OF DECISION: APRIL 2 2013 Court on its own motion .......Petitioner Versus State of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 2014

Present: Ms. Rita Kohli Advocate Vs. Presiding Officer and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-16-2014

Subject : Labour and Industrial

CWP No.8297 of 1989 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.8297 of 1989 Date of decision: 16.01.2014 Municipal Corporation, Ludhiana ...Petitioner(s) Versus Presiding Officer and another ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial