Advanced Search Results

Vije Kumar and ors. Vs. Vaibhav Gupta and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2009)3PLR40

ORDER1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 13th March, 2008 passed by the learned single judge of this Court in W.P. (Crl.) No. 328 of 2008.2. The writ petition was filed by Vaibhav Gupta...

Rahul JaIn and anr. Vs. Shri Pradeep Kumar and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : CivilTrusts and Societies

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 92 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 4, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 6, Rule 1 - Order 22, Rule 3 - Order 47, Rule 1; Religious Endowments Act, 1863; Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 69

Reported in : 138(2007)DLT329; 2007(94)DRJ89

Advocate for Respondent : Atul Kumar, Adv. for Defendant No. 1 and ; G.S. Raghav and ;

Gita Mittal, J.1. This application raises an interesting issue on first principles of adjudication on a application under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The question raised relates to the maintainability of an...

Rajesh K. Gupta Vs. Ram Gopal Agarwala and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Reported in : AIR2005SC2426; 2005(3)ALD75(SC); 2005CriLJ2581; 119(2005)DLT430(SC); JT2005(5)SC1; RLW2005(2)SC241; (2005)5SCC359

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Jain, Sr. Adv., ; Yunus Malik, ; Reetesh Singh and ;

G.P. Mathur, J. 1. Leave granted.2. This appeal by special leave has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 10.3.2005 of Delhi High Court by which the habeas corpus petition filed by the appellant was...

Dental Council of India and anr. Etc. Vs. Dr. H.R. Prem Sachdeva and o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

Acts : Dentist Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 6(1) and 7; Dental Council(Election) Regulations, 1952 - Regulation 23

Reported in : AIR1999SC3853; 1999(4)Crimes287(SC); JT1999(8)SC348; 1999(6)SCALE599; (1999)8SCC471; [1999]Supp4SCR1

Advocate for Respondent : Vikas Singh, ; Yunus Malik, ; Reetesh Singh, ;

ORDER1. Both these appeals, by special leave arise out of the judgment and order of the High Court of Delhi in CWP No. 3021 and 3023 of 1995, decided on 31st August, 1995.2. Although for all...

Subhash Chandra Singh Vs. Dheemant Singh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113B; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 304B

Reported in : JT2009(14)SC315; 2009(6)SCALE719; (2009)11SCC169

Advocate for Respondent : U.U. Lalit, Sr. Adv., ; Reetesh Singh, ; Jhanvi Wona and

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Leave granted.2. Challenge in this appeal is to the the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Allahabad High Court granting bail to the respondent No. 1. The appeal is by...

Sanjay Verma Vs. Manik Roy and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 1, Rule 10 and 10(2) - Order 22, Rule 10 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 52

Reported in : AIR2007SC1332; 2007(1)AWC462(SC); (SCSuppl)2007(2)CHN19; 2007(2)CTC562; [2007(2)JCR145(SC)]; (2007)3MLJ377(SC); (2007)147PLR229; 2006(14)SCALE81; A.I.R.2007S.C.W.1490; (2006) 13 SCC 608

Advocate for Respondent : Reetesh Singh, ; Yunus Malik and ; Prashant Choudhary, Ad

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Leave granted.2. Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Jharkhand High Court allowing application filed by the respondents in terms of Order I Rule...

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. Kundan Rice Mills Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Banking

Reported in : 2009(1)AWC157(SC); 2008(13)SCALE690; (2009)1SCC553

Advocate for Respondent : Mukul Rohatagi and ; S. Ganesh, Sr. Advs., ; Reetesh Singh

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Heard.2. Though these matters were listed for admission, learned Counsel for the parties requested the matters to be taken up for final disposal.3. Leave granted.4. We find that while adjudicating an interim matter,...

R.C. Kaushal Vs. Dda

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Delhi Development Authority (Validation of Disciplinary Powers) Act, 1998; Delhi Development Act, 1957 - Sections 3, 4(2), 52 and 57; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 21; Delhi Development Authority (Salaries, Allowances and Conditions of Service) Rules - Rule 18; Delhi Development Authority (Salaries, Allowances and Conditions of Service) Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 2(4), 14, 15, 15(1), 16, 17, 18, 55(2) and 57; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 311 and 311(1)

Reported in : 2007(1)ARBLR206(Delhi)

Advocate for Respondent : Reetesh Singh, Adv.

S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. In these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, three questions have been raised by the Petitioner, in respect of a disciplinary enquiry initiated into his conduct. During pendency of...

Shashi Kapoor Vs. State of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 406 and 498A

Reported in : 2008CriLJ1261; I(2008)DMC201

Advocate for Respondent : Jaideep Malik and ; Reetesh Singh, Advs.

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.FIR No. 259/07 Dated 12.4.2007Under Section 498A/406/34 IPCP.S. Punjabi Bagh1. It appears to be a case of commercial-cum-matrimonial dispute.2. Uma Kapur and Shashi Kapur seek pre-arrest bail in the afore-noted FIR which has been...