Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: ravindran · Page 1 of about 3,983 results (0.301 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 26 2002

R. Paulmanickam, Vs. the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Salem and

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-26-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 9A, 12, 12(2), 12(3) , 18 and 33C(2); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 300A

Reported in : [2003(96)FLR464]; (2003)ILLJ721Mad

Advocate for Respondent : S. Ravindran, Adv. for ;T.S. Gopalan & Co.

ORDERD. Murugesan, J.1. The petitioners, who are 18 in number have filed this writ petition, challenging the common order passed by the first respondent / Labour Court, Salem in C.P.Nos.894/94 to 928/1994, 3/95 to 6/95 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 1999

Thina Boomi Vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police, City Crime Branch

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-30-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 -- Sections 149; Tamil Nadu Prize Scheme (Prohibition) Act, 1979 -- Sections 2, 3, 4 and 5; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 -- Sections 420; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969

Reported in : 2000(1)CTC351

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R. Shanmugasundaram, Public Prosecutor

ORDER1. The petitioner, proprietor of Thina Boomi, a monthly magazine, seeks to quash the first information report, registered in Crime No.1219 of 1999, pending for investigation before the first respondent. 2. According to the petitioner, the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 16 1996

Nallam Krishnaraya Babu and Others Vs. the State Rep. by Inspector of ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : May-16-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397 and 401

Reported in : 1996CriLJ4484

Advocate for Respondent : I. Subramaniam, Addl. Govt. Pleader

ORDER1. This unnumbered revision petition has been filed against the endorsement of return made by learned Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Ulundurpet, on 10-5-1996, returning the petition filed by the petitioners herein against the proposed identification parade...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 14 2007

Ravindran @ John Vs. the Superintendent of Customs

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-14-2007

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 22, 29, 42, 42(2), 43, 50 and 57

Reported in : 2007CriLJ3414; JT2007(7)SC47; 2007(7)SCALE153; (2007)6SCC410

Advocate for Respondent : Vikas Singh, ASG., ; A.S. Rao, ; Navin Prakash, ;

B.P. Singh, J.1. The appellants herein with one other namely, Hiralal were tried by the Special District and Sessions Judge, Madurai in Crime Case No. 320 of 2001 charged of the offences under Section 8(c) read...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 1996

The Indian Oil Corporation Vs. Smt. Lakshmi Varma

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-19-1996

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 - Sections 21(1) and 21(4)

Reported in : ILR1996KAR2031; 1996(3)KarLJ190

Advocate for Respondent : V.H. Ron, Adv.

ORDERA.J. Sadashiva, J. 1. This revision petition is filed under Section 50(1) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961, for short 'the Act', calling in question the correctness of the order dated December 8, 1992, passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 2006

Laxmandas Vs. Amar Rochwani

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-05-2006

Subject : CriminalBanking

Reported in : 2(2007)BC178

S.S. Dwivedi, J.1. The appellant has preferred this appeal under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code feeling aggrieved by the judgment of acquittal dated 16.2.2004 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ujjain in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 08 2010

R.Nataraj .. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by Its Chief Secretary to ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-08-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.P.S.Raman; Mrs.Pusupa Menon; Mr.J.Ravindran; Mr.K.Sridhar; Mrs.T.Girija; Mr.S.Ragunathan, Advs.

1. The petitioner seeks for the issuance of a Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 9th respondent in O.A.No.245 of 2010 dated 8.3.2010 as well as the order of the 2nd respondent relating...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2011

Sri M. Narayan Reddy Vs. the Govt. of India

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-23-2011

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Respondent : Sri Ravindran; Sri Vivek Tanka, Advs.

:: 1. The petitioner is a Practicing Advocate, a former Member of Parliament and A.P. Legislative Assembly. He has also held positions in the Zilla Parishad, Nizamabad District, and was associated with the Agro Industries in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2011

Sri M. Narayan Reddy. Vs. the Govt. of India, and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-23-2011

Subject : Right to Information

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005 - Sections 8, 2(5_; Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - 3(4)(5)(6); Evidence Act - Sections 123, 124; Administrative Tribunal Act - Section 15; Constitution of India - Article 14

Advocate for Respondent : Sri Ravindran; Sri Vivek Tanka; Sri K. Vivek Reddy, Advs.

1. The petitioner is a Practicing Advocate, a former Member of Parliament and A.P. Legislative Assembly. He has also held positions in the Zilla Parishad, Nizamabad District, and was associated with the Agro Industries in different...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 2002

R. Vijayakumar Vs. the Anubhav Plantations Limited, T. Nagar, Chennai

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-26-2002

Subject : CommercialCompany

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 477, 477(5) and 477(6); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 420, 467 and 468

Reported in : [2002]112CompCas234(Mad); (2002)1MLJ805; [2003]42SCL26(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : M. Ravindran, Senior Adv.

S. Jagadeesan, J. 1. The appellant has preferred this appeal against the order of the learned Judge dated 4.12.2001 in the memo dated 16.8.2000 filed by the Administrator in Company Petition No.130 of 1999. 2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial