Advanced Search Results
Commnr. Central Excise and Customs, Mumbai and ors. Vs. I.T.C. Ltd. an ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-31-2006
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 9B and 9B(1)
2006(112)ECC592; 2006LC592(SC); 2006(203)ELT532(SC); JT2006(9)SC469; 2006(11)SCALE81; (2007)1SCC62
Rajan Narain, Adv.
S.B. Sinha, J. 1. Completion of an assessment proceedings whether is a sine qua non for issuance of notice under Section 11-A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short 'the Act') is the question involved...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDirector-general Vs. Usha International Ltd. and anr.
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC
Oct-31-1996
MRTP
Shri. Ravinder Narain
1. This is an application filed by the Director-General (Investigation and Registration) (DG) under Section 36B(c) of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, indicting the respondents named above, Usha International Ltd. and Jay Engineering...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jul-08-1985
Excise
(1989)(44)ELT393TriDel
Shri. Ravinder Narain
1. The question involved in all these three appeals is the same and the facts and question of law being one and common, so we are disposing of all these appeals by this common order.2. Briefly...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Collector of Central Excise Vs. Cyanides and Pigments Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Oct-31-1985
Excise
(1986)(6)LC241Tri(Delhi)
Shri. Ravinder Narain
1. This case relates to the levy of excise duty on synthetic red oxide of iron cleared by the respondents from their factory during the period 1-3-1975 to 2-2-1977. At the time of clearance, duty was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise, Vapi Vs. Kraftech Products Inc.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-14-2008
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 4A, 11A, 11A(1), 11AA, 11AB, 34 and 83; Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodity) Act, 1976; Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodity) Rules, 1977 - Rules 2, 6, 6(1), 12, 12(2), 17, 17(1), 25 and 34; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173Q; Central Excise (No.2) Rules, 2001 - Rule 25
AIR2008SC2238; 2008(127)ECC21; 2008(153)LC21(SC); 2008(224)ELT504(SC); JT2008(4)SC335; 2008(4)SCALE528; 2008AIRSCW3218; JT2008(4)SC335.
Ravinder Narain, ; Sonu Bhatnagar, ; Ajay Agarwal, ;
S.B. Sinha, J.1. Interpretation of Rule 34 of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodity) Rules, 1977 is in question in these appeals which arise out of the judgments and orders dated 10th May, 2004...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAdditional Commissioner of Surtax, Delhi-ii Vs. Food Specialities Ltd.
Delhi
Feb-25-1981
Direct Taxation
Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 - Schedule - Rules 1 and 3; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 34
(1981)23CTR(Del)65; [1981]129ITR731(Delhi)
Mr. Ravinder Narain
Ranganathan, J.1. This is a reference under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, at the instance of the Commissioner of Surtax. It relates to the assessment year 1969-70, in respect of which the previous years adopted...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDirector-general of Vs. Food Specialities Ltd.
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC
Oct-06-1986
MRTP
(1987)62CompCas122NULL
Shri. Ravinder Narain
1. This is an application made by the respondent praying that the notice of enquiry dated March 17, 1986, be discharged. Alternatively, it is prayed that such other order as may be deemed just and proper...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBalwant Singh Vs. Union of India and Another
Delhi
Jan-11-2016
Land Acquisition
1. The present appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act') is directed against the award dated 18.12.2012 passed by Ld. Additional District Judge-02, South, Saket Court Complex,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Special Tahsildar, Adi Dravida Welfare, Thirupattur Vs. Dayalan
Chennai
Mar-28-2016
Land Acquisition
V. Ramasubramanian, J. 1. The above second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the Subordinate Court, Thirupattur made in L.A.A.No.16 of 2004 dated 10.2.2005. The above appeal was filed beyond limitation. A...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJ. K. Synthetics Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others
Delhi
Apr-24-1981
Excise
Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 36 and 75; Income Tax Act; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9, 9(A), 9A(1), 9(1) and 47; Constitution of India - Article 226
1981(8)ELT328(Del)
S. Ranganathan, J.1. This is a writ petition filed by M/s. J.K. Synthetics Limited and its director Shri Sohan Lal Singhania praying for the issue of a writ of certiorari quashing the order of the Assistant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »