Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: ravinder narain · Page 1 of about 211 results (0.092 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 31 2006

Commnr. Central Excise and Customs, Mumbai and ors. Vs. I.T.C. Ltd. an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-31-2006

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 9B and 9B(1)

Reported in : 2006(112)ECC592; 2006LC592(SC); 2006(203)ELT532(SC); JT2006(9)SC469; 2006(11)SCALE81; (2007)1SCC62

Advocate for Respondent : Rajan Narain, Adv.

S.B. Sinha, J. 1. Completion of an assessment proceedings whether is a sine qua non for issuance of notice under Section 11-A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short 'the Act') is the question involved...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2008

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vapi Vs. Kraftech Products Inc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-14-2008

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 4A, 11A, 11A(1), 11AA, 11AB, 34 and 83; Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodity) Act, 1976; Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodity) Rules, 1977 - Rules 2, 6, 6(1), 12, 12(2), 17, 17(1), 25 and 34; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173Q; Central Excise (No.2) Rules, 2001 - Rule 25

Reported in : AIR2008SC2238; 2008(127)ECC21; 2008(153)LC21(SC); 2008(224)ELT504(SC); JT2008(4)SC335; 2008(4)SCALE528; 2008AIRSCW3218; JT2008(4)SC335.

Advocate for Respondent : Ravinder Narain, ; Sonu Bhatnagar, ; Ajay Agarwal, ;

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Interpretation of Rule 34 of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodity) Rules, 1977 is in question in these appeals which arise out of the judgments and orders dated 10th May, 2004...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 2016

Balwant Singh Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-11-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. The present appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act') is directed against the award dated 18.12.2012 passed by Ld. Additional District Judge-02, South, Saket Court Complex,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 28 2016

The Special Tahsildar, Adi Dravida Welfare, Thirupattur Vs. Dayalan

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-28-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

V. Ramasubramanian, J. 1. The above second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the Subordinate Court, Thirupattur made in L.A.A.No.16 of 2004 dated 10.2.2005. The above appeal was filed beyond limitation. A...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 1995

T.i.S.C.O. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jan-16-1995

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1995)LC523Tri(Delhi)

1. In both the appeals common question of law and facts arises and hence they are taken up together for disposal as per law.2. The question that arises for consideration in these appeals is the exigibility...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 05 1963

Jayantilal Amrit Lal Shodhan Vs. F.N. Rana and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-05-1963

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 73(1) and 258(1); ;Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960 - Sections 2 and 87; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 5A and 6

Reported in : AIR1964SC648; (1964)0GLR481; [1964]5SCR294

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 104 of 1963. Appeal from the judgment and order dated September 14, 1962, of the Gujarat High Court in Special Civil Application No. 145 of 1961. G.S. Pathak, G....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 1981

J. K. Synthetics Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-24-1981

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 36 and 75; Income Tax Act; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9, 9(A), 9A(1), 9(1) and 47; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1981(8)ELT328(Del)

S. Ranganathan, J.1. This is a writ petition filed by M/s. J.K. Synthetics Limited and its director Shri Sohan Lal Singhania praying for the issue of a writ of certiorari quashing the order of the Assistant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 16 1998

Shyam Oilcake Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Nov-16-1998

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1999)LC40Tri(Delhi)

1. In all these appeals, common question of law and facts are involved, hence they are all taken up together for disposal as per law.2. The question that arises for consideration in these appeals is as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 09 1999

Godfrey Philips India Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jul-09-1999

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2000)LC357Tri(Delhi)

1. By a show cause cum demand notice dated 21st December, 1990 Revenue alleged against the appellants herein that the latter bring loose cigarettes and packets of cigarettes (packets of 10s and 20s) from making room,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 1996

Director-general Vs. Usha International Ltd. and anr.

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Decided on : Oct-31-1996

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Ravinder Narain

1. This is an application filed by the Director-General (Investigation and Registration) (DG) under Section 36B(c) of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, indicting the respondents named above, Usha International Ltd. and Jay Engineering...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial