Advanced Search Results
Commnr. Central Excise and Customs, Mumbai and ors. Vs. I.T.C. Ltd. an ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-31-2006
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 9B and 9B(1)
2006(112)ECC592; 2006LC592(SC); 2006(203)ELT532(SC); JT2006(9)SC469; 2006(11)SCALE81; (2007)1SCC62
Rajan Narain, Adv.
S.B. Sinha, J. 1. Completion of an assessment proceedings whether is a sine qua non for issuance of notice under Section 11-A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short 'the Act') is the question involved...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise, Vapi Vs. Kraftech Products Inc.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-14-2008
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 4A, 11A, 11A(1), 11AA, 11AB, 34 and 83; Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodity) Act, 1976; Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodity) Rules, 1977 - Rules 2, 6, 6(1), 12, 12(2), 17, 17(1), 25 and 34; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173Q; Central Excise (No.2) Rules, 2001 - Rule 25
AIR2008SC2238; 2008(127)ECC21; 2008(153)LC21(SC); 2008(224)ELT504(SC); JT2008(4)SC335; 2008(4)SCALE528; 2008AIRSCW3218; JT2008(4)SC335.
Ravinder Narain, ; Sonu Bhatnagar, ; Ajay Agarwal, ;
S.B. Sinha, J.1. Interpretation of Rule 34 of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodity) Rules, 1977 is in question in these appeals which arise out of the judgments and orders dated 10th May, 2004...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBalwant Singh Vs. Union of India and Another
Delhi
Jan-11-2016
Land Acquisition
1. The present appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act') is directed against the award dated 18.12.2012 passed by Ld. Additional District Judge-02, South, Saket Court Complex,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Special Tahsildar, Adi Dravida Welfare, Thirupattur Vs. Dayalan
Chennai
Mar-28-2016
Land Acquisition
V. Ramasubramanian, J. 1. The above second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the Subordinate Court, Thirupattur made in L.A.A.No.16 of 2004 dated 10.2.2005. The above appeal was filed beyond limitation. A...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT.i.S.C.O. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jan-16-1995
Excise
(1995)LC523Tri(Delhi)
1. In both the appeals common question of law and facts arises and hence they are taken up together for disposal as per law.2. The question that arises for consideration in these appeals is the exigibility...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJayantilal Amrit Lal Shodhan Vs. F.N. Rana and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-05-1963
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 73(1) and 258(1); ;Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960 - Sections 2 and 87; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 5A and 6
AIR1964SC648; (1964)0GLR481; [1964]5SCR294
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 104 of 1963. Appeal from the judgment and order dated September 14, 1962, of the Gujarat High Court in Special Civil Application No. 145 of 1961. G.S. Pathak, G....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJ. K. Synthetics Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others
Delhi
Apr-24-1981
Excise
Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 36 and 75; Income Tax Act; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9, 9(A), 9A(1), 9(1) and 47; Constitution of India - Article 226
1981(8)ELT328(Del)
S. Ranganathan, J.1. This is a writ petition filed by M/s. J.K. Synthetics Limited and its director Shri Sohan Lal Singhania praying for the issue of a writ of certiorari quashing the order of the Assistant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShyam Oilcake Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Nov-16-1998
Excise
(1999)LC40Tri(Delhi)
1. In all these appeals, common question of law and facts are involved, hence they are all taken up together for disposal as per law.2. The question that arises for consideration in these appeals is as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGodfrey Philips India Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jul-09-1999
Excise
(2000)LC357Tri(Delhi)
1. By a show cause cum demand notice dated 21st December, 1990 Revenue alleged against the appellants herein that the latter bring loose cigarettes and packets of cigarettes (packets of 10s and 20s) from making room,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDirector-general Vs. Usha International Ltd. and anr.
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC
Oct-31-1996
MRTP
Shri. Ravinder Narain
1. This is an application filed by the Director-General (Investigation and Registration) (DG) under Section 36B(c) of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, indicting the respondents named above, Usha International Ltd. and Jay Engineering...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »