Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: rathin das and · Page 1 of about 20 results (0.039 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 11 1996

State of Punjab and Others Vs. M/S. Surinder Kumar and Co. and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-11-1996

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11

Reported in : AIR1997SC809; JT1997(1)SC393; (1997)115PLR779; 1997(1)SCALE151; (1997)9SCC66; [1996]Supp9SCR963

Advocate for Respondent : Rathin Das and ; Gaurav Banerjee-, Advs.

1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned Counsel on both sides.3. These appeals by special leave arise from the judgment and order of the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, dated May 29,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 1994

Hindalco Industries Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-07-1994

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 28 and 112; ;Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1994(74)ELT233(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Rathin Das and ;Prantosh Mukherjee, Advs.

Altamas Kabir, J.1. The petitioner No. 1 Company claims to be carrying on the business of manufacturing aluminium from bauxite ore at its factory at Renukoot in Sonbhadra District of Uttar Pradesh. According to the petitioners,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 2000

North Calcutta Co-operative Labour Contract Construction Society Limit ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-10-2000

Subject : Contempt of Court Limitation

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971;; Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 5

Reported in : (2000)2CALLT329(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Rathin Das and ;Mr. Uttar Mazumdar, Advs.

A. Kabir, J.1. This contempt application arises out of the order dated 10th September, 1998, passed by me on the writ application filed by the petitioners herein disposing of the same with certain directions for absorption...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 28 1990

Divisional Railway Manager, Eastern Railway and ors. Vs. Satyajit Maju ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-28-1990

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 19 and 38; ;Railways Act, 1890 - Section 148(2); ;Railways (Amendment) Act, 1989 - Section 200; ;Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 3 and 28

Reported in : (1991)2CALLT214(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Kashi Kanta Maitra and ;Bhaskar Prosad Vaisy, Advs.

Anandamoy Bhattacharjee, J.1. Even though Tennyson criticised British Laws as 'the Lawless Science of our Laws', as 'myriads of precedents' resulting in 'wilderness of single instances', the Poet also eulogised the system as where 'freedom broadens...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 1975

Gopal Krishan Das Vs. Sailendra Nath Biswas and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-26-1975

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rules 64, 66, 71, 84, 85 and 90; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1882 - Sections 4 and 6

Reported in : AIR1975SC1290; (1975)1SCC815; [1975]3SCR726; 1975(7)LC260(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Sen and ; P.K. Chatterjee, ; Rathin Das and ;

1. Premises No. 4-A, Chowringhee Road, Calcutta, belonged to the appellant Gopal Krishna Das and four others, each having an undivided one-fifth share therein. In 1951, one Ganga Prosad Gupta obtained two money-decrees against the appellant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 1970

Commissioner of Income-tax, West Bengal I, and anr. Vs. Anwar Ali

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-29-1970

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 28(1)

Reported in : AIR1970SC1782; [1970]76ITR696(SC); (1970)2SCC185; [1971]1SCR446

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Mukharjee,D.K. De, ; A.N. Sinha and ; Rathin Das, Advs.

A.N. Grover, J.1. This is an appeal by special leave from a judgment of the Calcutta High Court answering the following question which was referred to it by the Tribunal in the negative and in favour...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 1977

Heckett Engineering Co. Vs. their Workmen

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-11-1977

Subject : Service

Acts : General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 16; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Sections 5(3)

Reported in : AIR1977SC2257; [1977(35)FLR422]; 1977LabIC1843; (1978)ILLJ23SC; (1977)4SCC377; [1978]1SCR693; 1977(9)LC706(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Chatterjee, Sr. Adv. and ; Rathin Das, Adv.

Jaswant Singh, J.1. This appeal by special leave is directed against an award dated March 26, 1977 of the Ninth Industrial Tribunal, Durgapur, made in case No. X-39/75 and published vide Notification No. 1624-I.R., dated April...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 1975

Jnan Ranjan Sen Gupta and ors. Vs. Arun Kumar Bose

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-24-1975

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act - Sections 108

Reported in : AIR1975SC1994; (1975)2SCC526; [1976]1SCR105; 1975(7)UJ582(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : P. Chatterjee and ; Rathin Das, Advs.

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 185 of 1973.Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated the 25th April, 1972 of the Calcutta High Court in Second Appeal being appeal-No. 859 of 1969. Sachendra...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 1987

All India General Transport Corporation Vs. Sri Ambika Investment Co. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-27-1987

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1947 - Sections 8(3) and 11(1)

Reported in : 1987(35)BLJR684; JT1987(2)SC634; 1987(Supp)SCC662

Advocate for Respondent : Shankar Ghose, Sr. Adv. and ; Rathin Das, Adv.

ORDERA.P. Sen, J.1. We have heard Dr. Y.S. Chitale, learned Counsel for the appellants and find no reason to disagree with the view taken by the High Court. Sub-section (3) of Section 8 of the Bihar...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 15 1989

Gaurav JaIn Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-15-1989

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : AIR1990SC292; JT1989(4)SC315; 1991(1)SCALE963; 1990(Supp)SCC709; [1989]Supp2SCR173

Advocate for Respondent : Anil Dev Singh, Sr. Adv., ; Indra Makwana, ; Rathin Das, ;

ORDER1. This application under Article 32 of the Constitution is at the instance of an advocate by way of a public interest litigation asking for direction to the respondents for making provision of separate schools with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial