Advanced Search Results

National Engineering Industries Ltd. Vs. Shanker Lal and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 1982WLN490

M.L. Shrimal, J.1. By this writ petition, under Articles 226 and 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner National Engineering Industries. Limited, Jaipur, has challenged the correctness of the order dated June, 25 1969, of...

Smt. Mango Vs. Prem Chand

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Family

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 10, Rule 2; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 9, 9(1), 9(2) and 10 to 13

Reported in : AIR1962All447

Advocate for Respondent : J.N. Chatterjee, Adv.

Mithan Lal, J.1. This first appeal filed by Smt. Mango defendant arises out of the judgment and decree passed by the Civil Judge, Moradabad, in the suit of the husband-respondent filed under Section 9 of the...

Lala Fakir Chand Alias Kullo Mal Vs. Nanug Ram and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : AIR1924All277; 74Ind.Cas.721

Piggott, J.1. I review of Facts leading up to the Institution of the suit.1. The facts out of this, litigation arise may be stated as follows. About the, end of the year 1900 there were living...

S.V. Chandra Pandian and ors. Vs. S.V. Sivalinga Nadar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CommercialCivil

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 48; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(47) and 33

Reported in : 1993(1)ARBLR386(SC); 1993(41)BLJR543; [1995]212ITR592(SC); JT1993(1)SC278; (1993)1MLJ41(SC); 1993(1)SCALE141; (1993)1SCC589; [1993]1SCR58

1. The four appellants and respondents 1 and 2 are brothers. They were carrying on business in partnership in the name and style of Messer's Sivalinga Nadar and Brothers and S.V.S'. Oil Mills, both partnerships being...

Smt. Shashi and 16 ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1988(2)WLN262

Mahendra Bhushan Sharma, J.1. Though the above number of petitions are not covered by the same set of Rules, in as much as some are governed by the Rajasthan Educational Service (Collegiate Branch) Rules, 1986 (for...

Kamal @ Kamal Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 304 and 323

Reported in : RLW2004(1)Raj132; 2003(3)WLC445

Advocate for Respondent : Rajesh Kandwal, Amicus Curiae and; Madhav Mitra, Public Prosecutor

Bansal, J.1. The instant appeal stems from the judgment dated December 21, 1996 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST (prevention of Atrocities) cases and Additional Sessions Judge, Sawaimadhopur in Sessions Case No. 30/1996 whereby the convicted...

Tukappa Tamanna Lingardi Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1990)92BOMLR441; 1991CriLJ2375

Advocate for Respondent : Mrs. Manjula A. Rao, Addl. Public Prosecutor

Vaidya, J.1. This appeal is directed against an order dated 29th April, 1987 under which the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sawantwadi (Mr. S. R. Ghanvatkar) had convicted the appellant for an offence punishable under S. 302...

Samay Singh @ Gopal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : RLW2008(1)Raj37

Sangeet Lodha, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 18.9.2001 of the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Sawai Madhopur, whereby the appellant was convicted and sentenced as under:Under Section 302/149 IPC:To...

State of Rajasthan Vs. Ratan Lal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 148, 149, 300, 302 and 304

Reported in : 1995CriLJ2844

Advocate for Respondent : D.R. Bohra and; S.K. Vyas, Public Prosecutors

B.R. Arora, J.1. These three appeals are directed against the judgment dated 29-11-88, passed by the District and Sessions Judge, Pratabgarh, by which the learned Sessions Judge convicted accused-appellants Ganpat Lai and Jag Ram for the...

Ratan Lal Shah Vs. Firm Lalmandas Chhadammalal and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 4

Reported in : AIR1970SC108; 1970(0)BLJR158; (1969)2SCC70; [1970]1SCR296

Advocate for Respondent : B.C. Misra, ; O.P. Gupta, ; Ram Parkash Agarwal and ;

J.C. Shah, J.1. Firm Lalmandas Chhadammalal-hereinafter called 'the plaintiffs'-commenced an action against 'Mohan Singh Ratan Lal, through its partners Mohan Singh and Ratan Lal', in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Nainital, for a decree...