Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: rao ranjit · Page 1 of about 16 results (0.041 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 18 2001

Central Bank of India Vs. Ravindra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-18-2001

Subject : Banking

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 34, 34(1) and (2) - Order 6, 34, Rule 5 and 11; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1956; Income Tax Act, 1918; Travancore Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 31; Usurious Loans Act, 1918; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 21, 21A, 35A and 46(4); Banking Regulation Act, 1935

Reported in : AIR2001SC3095; 2002(50)BLJR207; [2001]107CompCas416(SC); JT2001(9)SC101; 2002(1)KLT743(SC); (2002)1MLJ109(SC); RLW2002(2)SC241; 2001(7)SCALE351; (2002)1SCC367; 2002 (1) SCC 36

Advocate for Respondent : Ex-parte

ORDER After hearing learned Attorney General and amicus curiae S/Shri A. Subba Rao, Ranjit Kumar and K.M.K. Nair on (the interpretation of the provisions of Section 34 CPC on 'the principal sum adjudged' the matter is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 13 2001

Jagdish Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-13-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8 and 18

Reported in : AIR2002SC2540; 2002(80)ECC3; JT2001(10)SC330

1. This appeal by special leave is directed against an order and judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Indore Bench dated 26-9-1997 upholding the conviction and sentence of the appellant for an offence under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 07 1996

Central Bank of India Vs. Ravindra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-07-1996

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 34; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1956

Reported in : 1996VAD(SC)205; II(1996)BC342(SC); [1996]87CompCas289(SC); 1996(2)CTC528; JT1996(5)SC589; 1996(5)SCALE13; (1996)5SCC279; [1996]Supp2SCR520

ORDER1. After hearing learned Attorney General and amicus curaie S/Shri A. Subba Rao, Ranjit Kumar and K.M.K. Nair on (the interpretation of the provisions of Section 34, CPC on 'the principal sum adjudged' the matter is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 16 2014

Dilawar Singh and ors. Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-16-2014

Subject : Criminal

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1362 OF2010DILAWAR SINGH & ORS. …Appellants Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.826 OF2010STATE OF HARYANA .. Appellant Versus BALKAR SINGH &...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 24 1996

Parveen Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-24-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 307; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 5

Reported in : 1996VIIIAD(SC)202; AIR1997SC310; 1997(1)ALD(Cri)141; 1997CriLJ252; 1996(4)Crimes150(SC); JT1996(9)SC511; (1994)IIILLJ256SC; 1996(7)SCALE753; (1996)11SCC365

ORDERS.P. Kurdukar, J.1. Two separate trials resulting into convictions of the appellant arising out of an incident dated August 3, 1989 have given rise to these two appeals. Criminal Appeal No. 735 of 1991 arose out...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 14 2011

Bansi Lal. Vs. State of HaryanA.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-14-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 498-A, 304-B and 306; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , (CRPC) 1973 - Sections 319, 313

1. This criminal appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh dated 5th May, 2004 in Criminal Appeal No. 708-SB of 1998, by which the conviction...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 14 2022

State Through The Inspector Of Police Vs. Laly @ Manikandan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-14-2022

Subject : Criminal

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1750-1751 OF2022State through the Inspector of Police …Appellant Versus Laly @ Manikandan & Another Etc. …Respondents JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 30 2001

Santosh Yadav Vs. Narender Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-30-2001

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 8(1), 8(3), 30, 83, 100, 100(1), 100(2) and 116A; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304-B and 498A

Reported in : AIR2002SC241; 2001(6)ALD127(SC); 2002(1)ALLMR(SC)650; JT2001(9)SC392; 2001(7)SCALE538; (2002)1SCC160

Advocate for Respondent : Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv., ; Rao Ranjit Singh and ; Ms Niranj

R.C. Lahoti, J.1. Pursuant to a notification issued by the Election Commission of India under Section 30 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter 'the Act', for short) in the month of January 2000...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 1997

i.K. Mishra Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-11-1997

Subject : Constitution Service

Reported in : AIR1997SC3740; JT1997(6)SC390; 1997(4)SCALE646; (1997)6SCC228; [1997]Supp2SCR260; 1997(2)LC396(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : M.L. Jain, ; (Rao Ranjit) for C.V. Subba Rao, Advs.

ORDERV.N. Khare, J.1. The appellant before us, started his service career as a Sub-Auditor in the erstwhile Holkar Estate, Indore with effect from 5th February, 1943. Subsequently on reorganisation of States in the year 1956 the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 2010

Bahadur Singh Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-06-2010

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 15, 42, 42(1), 42(2) and 57

Advocate for Respondent : Rao Ranjit, Adv.

Altamas Kabir, J.1. The petitioner was convicted for an offence punishable under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the 'NDPS Act') and was sentenced to undergo rigorous...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial