Advanced Search Results

Sujit Chatterjee Vs. Rita Chatterjee

Court : Kolkata

Subject : CriminalLimitation

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125, 126(2), 401 and 482; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 5

Reported in : (2002)3CALLT260(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Ranjit Kumar Roy and ;Ketaki Ganguli, Advs.

Asit Kumar Bisi, J.1. The instant revisional application under Section, 401 and 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been preferred by the petitioner against the Order dated 19.4.2000 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate,...

Chandana Roy and anr. Vs. State of Tripura and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Hrishikesh Roy, J.1. The petitioners have moved this Court seeking a direction for extending the benefit of employment contemplated under the die-in-harness scheme prevalent in the State of Tripura. The petitioners are also putting forward an...

V. Somanath Raju and anr. Vs. Konchada Ramamurty Subudhi and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Contract

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 20 and 21(2) - Schedule - Article 73; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 126 and 128

Reported in : AIR1957Ori106; 23(1957)CLT159

Advocate for Respondent : P.C. Chatterji, Adv.

Das, J.1. This is an appeal by defendants 3 and 4 against the judgment of the Additional Subordinate Judge of Berhampur dated 31-10-1952. The facts giving rise to this appeal are: The plaintiff filed a suit...

Hiralal Chhotalal Shah Vs. Centeral Bank of India and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1981)22GLR846

S.B. Majmudar, J.1. This appeal is filed by original defendant No. 2 in regular civil suit No. 1552 of 1971 filed in the court of the 3rd Joint Civil Judge (Junior Division) Surat by respondent No....

Anandilal Poddar Vs. Gunendra Kr. Roy and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 22 and 35

Reported in : AIR1966Cal107

ORDERA.N. Ray, J. 1. The plaintiff Anandilal Poddar instituted this suit on May 24; 1958 against Rai Bahadur Gunendra Krishna Roy and United Bank of India Ltd., for specific performance of the contract dated August 25,...

Jnan Chandra Mukherjee Vs. Manoranjan Mitra and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ContractLimitation

Reported in : AIR1942Cal251

1. This appeal is on behalf of the plaintiff and it arises out of a suit commenced by him to recover a sum of Rs. 5000 alleged to be due as principal and interest on two...

The State Vs. Sunil Biswas and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 304, 307 and 326; ;Indian Explosives Act - Section 6(3); ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 32(1); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 378(1) and 386

Reported in : 1990CriLJ2093

Advocate for Respondent : Balai Roy, ;Y. Dastoor and ;Chaitannya Mukherji, Advs.

Ajit K. Sengupta, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred by the State of West Bengal represented by the Public Prosecutor, High Court, Calcutta under Section 378(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the order...

Debjani Niyogi Vs. Bani Niyogi and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Family

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 63 and 67; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 59, 63 and 65

Reported in : 2005(3)CHN223

Advocate for Respondent : Amitabha Chowdhury, ;Gora Chand Dey and ;Arun Kanti Chatterjee, Advs.

Asok Kumar Ganguly, J. 1. This appeal arises out of a probate proceeding and is directed against a judgment and decree dated 16.09.1999 passed in Original Suit No. 5 of 1998 by which the application for...

Ranjit Kumar Roy Vs. Smt. Sandhya Mandal @ Sandhya Rani Mandal

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

GA No.807 of 2012 PLA No.211 of 2006 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE In the goods of: Dr. Sr.Pulin Behari Mondal (Deceased) And Ranjit Kumar Roy Versus Smt. Sandhya...

Ramesh Chander Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Pratibha Rani, J. 1. After serving BSF for about a quarter of century with unblemished service records and 17 rewards to his credit, dismissal from service was something which was least expected by the petitioner. 2....