Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: ranjit kumar ghosal · Page 1 of about 14 results (0.045 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 14 2010

Babu Majhi @ Bag Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-14-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 148 and 302; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 313

Advocate for Respondent : Ranjit Kumar Ghosal, Adv.

Ashim Kumar Banerjee, J.1. The incident occurred in 1992. The accused were charged under Section 148 as well as Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accused pleaded not guilty and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 2006

Shankar Jaiswara Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-30-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 85, 86, 302, 304 and 304A; ;Evidence Act - Section 27

Reported in : 2006(2)CHN210

Advocate for Respondent : Ranjit Kr. Ghosal and; Minoti Gomes, Advs.

Amit Talukdar, J.1. Impact of Section 86 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, the IPC) if felt, then it would be a primordial consideration in this appeal. If not, it has to be decided on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 2011

Nirmalendu Ghoswami Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata Appellate

Decided on : Feb-03-2011

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ranjit Kr. Ghosal, Adv

1) This appeal is directed against an order and judgement dated 27.3.1991 passed by the learned Judge, 4th Special Court, Calcutta convicting the appellant/accused in Special case no. 5 of 1985 under Section 161 of Indian...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 18 2010

Jaydeb Sau @ Shaw and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-18-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 32 and 106; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302, 304B, 307, 326 and 498A

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Ghosal, Adv.

Ashim Kumar Banerjee, J.1. The victim was married to Joydeb Sau @ Shaw at an early age. From the evidence it would appear that she was a minor when she was married. She was not so...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 30 2005

Nishi Roy Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-30-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Juvenile Justice Act, 1986; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 302; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 164; ;Juvenile Justice Act, 2000

Reported in : 2006(4)CHN255

Advocate for Respondent : Ranjit Kumar Ghosal, Adv.

Alok Kumar Basu, J.1. Nishi Roy, the juvenile delinquent, being convicted under Section 302 of the IPC by the ld. Sessions Judge. Purulia on 27th May, 1997 in connection with Sessions Trial No. 15 of 1996...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2006

Manindra Majhi Vs. State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-24-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Section 27; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 302 and 320

Reported in : 2006(3)CHN796

Advocate for Respondent : Ranjit Kumar Ghosal, Adv.

Alok Kumar Basu, J.1. The present appeal was of the year 1988 challenging the order of conviction and sentence recorded against the present appellant by the ld. Sessions Judge, Purulia on 25th May, 1988 in connection...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 2010

Tarit Baran Chaudhury Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-18-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1), 5(2) and 6; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 420 and 465; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313 and 428

Advocate for Respondent : Ranjit Kumar Ghosal, Adv.

S.P. Talukdar, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 17th March, 1988 passed by the learned Judge, Second Special Court, Calcutta in Special Case No. 1 of 1977. The learned Court convicted...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 1990

Smt. Reena Mitra Vs. Ashesh Kumar Mitra

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-24-1990

Subject : Family

Acts : Special Marriage Act, 1954 - Sections 22 and 27

Reported in : 95CWN185,II(1990)DMC343

Advocate for Respondent : Ranjit Kumar Ghosal and ;Dipanwita Chowdhury, Advs.

S.S. Ganguly, J.1. This appeal has been preferred from the judgment and decree passed in Matrimonial Suit No. 24 of 1982 by the Id. Additional District Judge, 7th Court, Alipore.2. Admittedly the parties were married on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 1997

State of West Bengal Vs. Ashoke Bose

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-21-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Panel Code, 1860 - Section 302; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 313(1)

Reported in : 1997CriLJ3436

Advocate for Respondent : Kazi Safiuallah and ;Ranjit Kumar Ghosal, Advs.

Nripendra Kumar Bhattacharyya , J.1. The State has preferred this Govt. Appeal No. 6/94 against a judgment of acquittal of Asok Bose who was an accused in a case under Section 302 of the IPC passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 1978

Sm. Bijoli Choudhury Vs. Sukomal Choudhury

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-10-1978

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 10(1) and 13(1)

Reported in : AIR1979Cal87

Advocate for Respondent : B.K. Ghosh, ;Ranjit Kumar Ghosal and ;Rabindra Nath Dutta, Advs.

Chittatosh Mookerjee, J.1. On February 27, 1963 the respondent Sukomal Choudhury, had married the appellant, Bijoli Choudhnry, according to Buddhist Rites at P 12/1, Dihi Serampore Road, P. S. Beniapu-kur, Calcutta. On 23rd November, 1972 the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial