Advanced Search Results
Babu Majhi @ Bag Vs. the State of West Bengal
Kolkata
May-14-2010
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 148 and 302; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 313
Ranjit Kumar Ghosal, Adv.
Ashim Kumar Banerjee, J.1. The incident occurred in 1992. The accused were charged under Section 148 as well as Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accused pleaded not guilty and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShankar Jaiswara Vs. State of West Bengal
Kolkata
Jan-30-2006
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 85, 86, 302, 304 and 304A; ;Evidence Act - Section 27
2006(2)CHN210
Ranjit Kr. Ghosal and; Minoti Gomes, Advs.
Amit Talukdar, J.1. Impact of Section 86 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, the IPC) if felt, then it would be a primordial consideration in this appeal. If not, it has to be decided on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNirmalendu Ghoswami Vs. the State of West Bengal
Kolkata Appellate
Feb-03-2011
Criminal
Mr. Ranjit Kr. Ghosal, Adv
1) This appeal is directed against an order and judgement dated 27.3.1991 passed by the learned Judge, 4th Special Court, Calcutta convicting the appellant/accused in Special case no. 5 of 1985 under Section 161 of Indian...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Jaydeb Sau @ Shaw and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal
Kolkata
May-18-2010
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 32 and 106; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302, 304B, 307, 326 and 498A
R.K. Ghosal, Adv.
Ashim Kumar Banerjee, J.1. The victim was married to Joydeb Sau @ Shaw at an early age. From the evidence it would appear that she was a minor when she was married. She was not so...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNishi Roy Vs. State of West Bengal
Kolkata
Aug-30-2005
Criminal
Juvenile Justice Act, 1986; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 302; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 164; ;Juvenile Justice Act, 2000
2006(4)CHN255
Ranjit Kumar Ghosal, Adv.
Alok Kumar Basu, J.1. Nishi Roy, the juvenile delinquent, being convicted under Section 302 of the IPC by the ld. Sessions Judge. Purulia on 27th May, 1997 in connection with Sessions Trial No. 15 of 1996...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManindra Majhi Vs. State
Kolkata
Apr-24-2006
Criminal
Evidence Act - Section 27; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 302 and 320
2006(3)CHN796
Ranjit Kumar Ghosal, Adv.
Alok Kumar Basu, J.1. The present appeal was of the year 1988 challenging the order of conviction and sentence recorded against the present appellant by the ld. Sessions Judge, Purulia on 25th May, 1988 in connection...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTarit Baran Chaudhury Vs. the State of West Bengal
Kolkata
May-18-2010
Criminal
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1), 5(2) and 6; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 420 and 465; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313 and 428
Ranjit Kumar Ghosal, Adv.
S.P. Talukdar, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 17th March, 1988 passed by the learned Judge, Second Special Court, Calcutta in Special Case No. 1 of 1977. The learned Court convicted...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Reena Mitra Vs. Ashesh Kumar Mitra
Kolkata
Apr-24-1990
Family
Special Marriage Act, 1954 - Sections 22 and 27
95CWN185,II(1990)DMC343
Ranjit Kumar Ghosal and ;Dipanwita Chowdhury, Advs.
S.S. Ganguly, J.1. This appeal has been preferred from the judgment and decree passed in Matrimonial Suit No. 24 of 1982 by the Id. Additional District Judge, 7th Court, Alipore.2. Admittedly the parties were married on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of West Bengal Vs. Ashoke Bose
Kolkata
Feb-21-1997
Criminal
Indian Panel Code, 1860 - Section 302; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 313(1)
1997CriLJ3436
Kazi Safiuallah and ;Ranjit Kumar Ghosal, Advs.
Nripendra Kumar Bhattacharyya , J.1. The State has preferred this Govt. Appeal No. 6/94 against a judgment of acquittal of Asok Bose who was an accused in a case under Section 302 of the IPC passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSm. Bijoli Choudhury Vs. Sukomal Choudhury
Kolkata
Jul-10-1978
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 10(1) and 13(1)
AIR1979Cal87
B.K. Ghosh, ;Ranjit Kumar Ghosal and ;Rabindra Nath Dutta, Advs.
Chittatosh Mookerjee, J.1. On February 27, 1963 the respondent Sukomal Choudhury, had married the appellant, Bijoli Choudhnry, according to Buddhist Rites at P 12/1, Dihi Serampore Road, P. S. Beniapu-kur, Calcutta. On 23rd November, 1972 the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »