Advanced Search Results

Godabarish Mishra Vs. Kuntala Mishra and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Secitons 161 and 313

Reported in : 1996VIIAD(SC)825; AIR1997SC286; 1997(1)ALT(Cri)412; 84(1997)CLT597(SC); 1997CriLJ246; JT1996(9)SC708; 1996(7)SCALE761; (1996)11SCC264; [1996]Supp7SCR688

Advocate for Respondent : Ranjit Kumar, ; C.S. Srinivas Rao (N.P.) and ; Anu Mohla,

ORDER1. In this appeal the order of acquittal in favour of the accused Kuntala Mishra, by the judgment dated October 1, 1986 passed by the High Court of Orissa in Criminal Appeal No. 276 of 1984,...

Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd. Vs. Federal Motors Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1), 38, 38(3); Constitution of India - Article 224; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 5, 5(1) and 5(3); Transfer of Property Act, 1882; Madhya Prdesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961

Reported in : 2005(3)BomCR274; 2005(1)CTC53; 115(2004)DLT531(SC); JT2004(10)SC410; (2005)2MLJ1(SC); (2005)141PLR643; 2004(10)SCALE345; (2005)1SCC705

Advocate for Respondent : Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv., ; Anu Mohla and ; P.D. Gupta, Advs

R.C. Lahoti, C.J.1. Leave granted.2. The suit premises are non-residential commercial premises admeasuring approximately 1000 sq. ft. and situated in Connaught Circus, New Delhi. The premises are owned by the appellant and held on tenancy by...

Narendra Kante Vs. Anuradha Kante and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17 and 17(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Hindu Law

Reported in : 2010(1)ALT52(SC); 2010(1)AWC921(SC); 2009(14)SCALE665; (2010)2SCC77

Advocate for Respondent : Ranjit Kumar, ; V.K. Bhardwaj, ; Nagendra Rai, ;

Altamas Kabir, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 13th October, 2008, passed by the Gwalior -Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissing Miscellaneous Appeal No. 478 of 2007...

Hotel Kings and ors. Vs. Sara Farhan Lukmani and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 13; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 5(7), 5(10), 5(11), 7, 9, 10, 10AA, 10(1), 10(3), 11, 11(2), 12(2), 12(3), 13, 14, 15 and 15A; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105 and 114; Maharashtra Education (Cess) Act, 1962

Reported in : 2007(2)ALLMR(SC)916; JT2006(10)SC566; (2007)146PLR381; 2006(12)SCALE193; (2007)1SCC202

Advocate for Respondent : C.A. Sundaram and ; Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Advs. ; Mukul Tally

Altamas Kabir, J.1. Leave granted in both the special leave petitions.2. Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 in both the special leave petitions are the owners of a plot of land measuring about 2739.50 sq.yds. bearing survey...

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2000(6)SCALE568; (2000)9SCC519a

ORDER1. We have gone through the submissions on behalf of the Delhi Jal Board. More than four years ago, this Court had directed the setting up of Sewage Treatment Plants. In any metropolitan town in a...

Sanjay Chandra and ors. Vs. C.B.i.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (CRPC) - Sections 439, 170, 161, 164, 88, 437, 498, 173(8); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420, 468, 471; PC (Prevention Of Corruption) Act - Section 13(2) read with 13(1)(d); Constitution of India - Article 21

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Uday Lalit; Ms. Sonia Mathur; Mr. Narender Mann; Mr. A.K. Singh; Mr. Shubharanshu Padhi; Mr. Sangram Singh Saron; Mr. Siddhesh Kotwal, Advs.

1. Accused Sanjay Chandra, Vinod Goenka, Gautam Doshi, Hari Nair and Surendra Pipara vide above referred applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. are seeking bail in case FIR No.RC-DAI-2009-A-0045 P.S. ACB, CBI New Delhi under Section 420,...

Mahendra Singh Jaggi Vs. Dataram Jagannath

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rules 10 and 19

Reported in : AIR1997SC1219; 84(1997)CLT663(SC); JT1997(1)SC505; 1997(1)SCALE327; (1998)9SCC28

ORDER1. Leave granted in all these special leave petitions.2. By consent of parties the appeals arising from these special leave petitions were heard finally and are being disposed of by this judgment as common questions are...

Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs. Madhusudan Das and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 12(3); Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Evidence Act - Sections 108; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 16 and 309

Reported in : AIR2009SC1153; [2009(1)JCR171(SC)]; JT2008(12)SC642; (2009)IIILLJ54SC; RLW2009(2)SC1623; 2008(15)SCALE39; 2009(2)SLJ243(SC):2009AIRSCW390:2009(2)LHSC751

Advocate for Respondent : Braj K. Mishra, ; Aparna Jha, ; Abhishek Yadav, ;

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Interpretation of terms of a tripartite settlement providing for appointment on compassionate ground is in question in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 20.09.2006 passed by...

Surjit Singh and anr. Vs. Kumar Pahilaj and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106 and 111; Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1956; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 12, Rule 6 - Order 39, Rule 10 - Order 41, Rule 5

Reported in : 129(2006)DLT572; 2006(88)DRJ693

Advocate for Respondent : Arun Bhardwaj and ; Ranjit Singh, Advs.

Mukul Mudgal, J.1. With the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, this civil revision petition is taken up for final hearing.2. This civil revision petition has been preferred against the order of the learned...

V. Subramani and anr. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 96, 97, 96, 98, 99, 100 to 106, 109, 147, 148, 149, 302, 304, 307, 323 and 324; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 105

Reported in : AIR2005SC1983; 2005CriLJ1727; 2005(1)JKJ25[SC]; JT2005(3)SC82; (2005)10SCC358; 2005(2)LC1004(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Abhay Kumar and ; Subramonium Prasad, Advs.

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Leave granted.2. Appellants call in question legality of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Madras High Court affirming their conviction and sentence for alleged commission of offence punishable under Section...