Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: ranji thomas · Page 1 of about 25 results (0.042 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 18 2001

Mangilal Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-18-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 307, 323, 324 and 498-A

Reported in : AIR2001SC2937; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)19; 2001CriLJ4760; II(2001)DMC628SC; JT2001(9)SC172; 2001(7)SCALE324; (2001)8SCC519

Advocate for Respondent : B.D. Sharma, ; Ranji Thomas and ; Javed Mahmud Rao, Advs.

S.N. Variava, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Heard parties. 3. This appeal is against the judgment dated 5th July, 2000, by which the High Court has summarily dismissed the Revision Petition filed by the Appellant herein....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2025

Okhla Enclave Plot Holders Wel. Ason versus Union of India Through Sec ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-25-2025

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2397

Advocate for Respondent : Mrs. Aishwarya Bhati, Mrs. Archana Pathak Dave A.S.Gs, Ms. Himanshi Sakya, Ms. Drishti Saraf, Ms. Pragya Upadhyay, Ms. Aakansha, Ms. Ruchika Bhan, Ms. Pratibha Jain, Ms. Rashmi Nandakumar, Mrs. Aakanksha Kaul, Ms. Sunanda Shukla, Mrs. Suman Lata Katiyar

[2025] 4 S.C.R. 2397 : 2025 INSC 573Okhla Enclave Plot Holders Wel. Ason. v. Union of India Through Secretary & Ors. (Miscellaneous Application No. 1290 of 2022 In Writ Petition (Civil) No. 876 of 1996) 25...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 2003

State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Anand Prakash Solanki

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-25-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 9, 10, 10(1), 10(1A), 16, 17, 20, 24B, 24B(1) and 24B(2); Cantonments Act, 1924; Services Commissions Act; Education Act

Reported in : AIR2003SC3849; 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)713; 2003(6)ALT11(SC); (SCSuppl)2004(1)CHN80; III(2003)CPJ12(SC); [2003(4)JCR98(SC)]; JT2003(Suppl1)SC300; 2004(1)MhLj455; (2004)1MLJ6(SC); 2

Advocate for Respondent : Pallav Shishodia and ; T. Mahipal, Advs.

R.C. Lahoti, J. 1. The questions arising for decision in this appeal are: Whether a President or a Member of the District Forum, constituted under Section 10 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter 'the Act',...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 02 2001

Mrs. K. Chandra and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Represented by Its S ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-02-2001

Subject : Media and Communication

Reported in : (2001)3MLJ504

ORDERN.K. Jain, C.J.1. These two writ petitions along with writ miscellaneous petitions came up for hearing before us.2. This Court on 6.7.2001 in W.M.P. Nos. 17235 and 17236 of 2001 in W.P.No. 11819 of 2001 which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 2025

Jai Prakash versus State of Uttarakhand

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-16-2025

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : [2025]8S.C.R.243

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Saakshi Singh Rawat, Ms. Rachna Gandhi

[2025] 8 S.C.R. 243 : 2025 INSC 861 Jai Prakash v. State of Uttarakhand (Criminal Appeal No(s). 331-332 of 2022) 16 July 2025 [Vikram Nath, Sanjay Karol* and Sandeep Mehta JJ.] Issue for Consideration Allegation against...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 2020

Ranji Thomas vs Kottayam Municipality

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-07-2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2020 / 16TH BHADRA, 1942 PETITIONER: RANJI THOMAS AGED 59, S/O MATHEW THOMAS, SENIOR ADVOCATE,PATHINETTIL, THIRUVATHUKAL,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 16 2003

Harish Verma and ors. Vs. Ajay Srivastava and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-16-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 16 to 20, 20(1) and 33; Post Graduate Medical Education Regulations 2000 - Regulation 9; Rajasthan High Court Ordinance - Sections 18; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(4) and 136

Reported in : AIR2003SC3371; [2003(4)JCR79(SC)]; JT2003(Suppl1)SC322; 2003(7)SCALE598; (2003)8SCC69; 2004(1)LC355(SC)

R.C. Lahoti, J.1. Leave granted in SLP (C) Nos. 4965/03 and 14367-91/03. 2. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 33 read with Section 20 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, the Medical Council...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 2013

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sri Sadanand R. Kotian and Another

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Decided on : Jan-17-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

SURESH CHANDRA, MEMBER This revision petition has been filed by the insurance company which was opposite party no. 1 in the complaint before the District Forum. The respondent no. 1 was the original complainant and respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 2003

Radha Mohan Lal Vs. Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-11-2003

Subject : CriminalContempt of Court

Reported in : AIR2003SC1467; 2003CriLJ1207; JT2003(2)SC49; RLW2003(3)SC375; 2003(2)SCALE36; (2003)3SCC427; [2003]1SCR1011; 2003(1)UJ750(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Vijay Bahuguna, Sr. Adv., ; Ranji Thomas, ; Bharati Upadhyaya

By the impugned judgment and order dated 31st March, 1993, the High Court has come to the conclusion that the appellant Radha Mohan Lal (Criminal Appeal No.445/93) and his advocate, appellant Sualal Yadav (Criminal Appeal No.449/93)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2002

Vikas Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-02-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 302, 304B, 364, 498 and 498A

Reported in : AIR2002SC2830; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)213; 2002CriLJ3760; 2002(3)Crimes62(SC); JT2002(5)SC573; 2002(5)SCALE477; (2002)6SCC728; [2002]SUPP1SCR435; 2002(2)LC1210(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Vijay Bhauguna, Sr. Adv., ; Ranji Thomas, Adv. and ; Bharari

Shah, J.1. Daily, demon of dowry is devouring lives of young girls, who marry with high hopes of having heavenly abode in their husband's house. In few cases, guilty are punished but it has no deterrent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial