Advanced Search Results
Vempati Satyanarayana Murthy Vs. R. Krishna Iyer Alias Krishna Rao and ...
Chennai
Jul-18-1949
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 144 and 147
AIR1950Mad593
A. Bhujanga Rao, Adv.;The Public Prosecutor
ORDERPanchapakesa Ayyar, J.1. This petition raises an interesting question of law, namely, whether the right to recite sankalpams to such persons as bathe in the holy Pushkarani thirtham in Thirumalai Hills and want sankalpams will fall...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGanesh and anr. Vs. State
Allahabad
Feb-13-1976
Criminal
1976CriLJ1403
ORDERH.L. Capoor, J.1. Ganesh and Puttu have preferred this application in revision against the order, dated 11th May, 1972 of Sri Harish Chandra, First Civil and Sessions Judge, Shahjahanpur, dismissing the appeal and upholding the conviction...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Syed Ibrahim
Chennai
Aug-13-1956
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4, 4(1), 250 and 417(3)
AIR1959Mad32; 1959CriLJ203
Public Prosecutor
Somasundaram, J. 1. This is an application by P. W. 1 in S. C. No.6 of 1956 on the file of the Sessions Judge ofWest Tanjore for leave to appeal under Clause (3)of Section 417 Crl....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
K.S.R.T.C. vs. R.T.a.
Karnataka
Feb-01-1985
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 64
ILR1985KAR3311
S. Udayashankar, HCGP for R-1; ;R.N. Narasimhamurthy, Adv. for R-2; ;C.S. Shanthamallappa, Adv. for R-3
ORDERK.A. Swami, J.1. Respondent No. 2 bas entered appearance through Sri R. N. Narasimha Murthy, Advocate. The third Respondent has entered caveat through Sri C. S. Shanthamallappa, Advocate. Sri S. Udayashankar, Learned Government Pleader is directed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmmathayee Ammal and anr. Vs. Kumaresan and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-15-1966
FamilyProperty
Hindu Law; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 112
AIR1967SC569; 1967(0)BLJR356; [1967]1SCR353
Wanchoo, J.1. This is an appeal on a certificate granted by the Madras High Court and arises in the following circumstances. One Rangaswami Chettiar was a man of considerable property and used to live in Poolathur...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarayanasamy Naicker and anr. Vs. Periasamy Odayar
Chennai
Feb-02-1921
LimitationProperty
AIR1921Mad272(1); (1921)41MLJ163
Spencer, J.1. In the course of hill and able arguments on either side to which we have listened; no reported case has been cited in whicli a question arose of a choice between the application of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKadirvelu Chettiar Vs. Kempu Chettiar and ors.
Chennai
Oct-03-1940
Property
AIR1941Mad315; (1940)2MLJ877
Mockett, J.1. The point to which Mr. Rangaswami Aiyangar has directed a very interesting and careful argument does not appear to have been decided in any reported case. It can be very simply stated. On the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSaranga Sesha Naidu Vs. Periasami Odayar
Chennai
Feb-02-1921
LimitationProperty
(1921)ILR44Mad951
Spencer, J.1. In the course of the full and able arguments on either side to which we have listened, no reported case has been cited in which a question arose of a choice between the application...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Public Prosecutor Vs. K. Bhimeswara Rao
Chennai
Jul-23-1947
Criminal
AIR1948Mad258; (1947)2MLJ594
Rajamannar, J.1. This is an appeal against the acquittal of the accused in C.C. No. 55 of 1946 by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Ellore. He was charged with an offence under Section 420 of the Indian Penal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.R. Kulkarni and ors. Vs. the State of Mysore and ors.
Karnataka
Aug-24-1966
ServiceConstitution
States Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 115, 115(2) and 116; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 311
AIR1967Kant225; AIR1967Mys225
M. Rangaswamy, Adv. for High Court Spl. Govt. Pleader and ;B. Venkataswamy, Adv.
ORDER1. The petitioners in these three writ petitions were holding the substantive post of a police constable in the State of Bombay. But they were officiating until October 26, 1956 as wireless operators in that State....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »