Advanced Search Results

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Mst. Hansi and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 168; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115

Reported in : I(1997)ACC134; 1996ACJ571; AIR1996Raj71; 1996(1)WLC327

Advocate for Respondent : Rameshwar Chouhan, Adv.

ORDERB.J. Shethna, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Learned counsel Shri Loonkar has vehemently submitted that the learned Tribunal has committed an error in awarding Rs. 25,000/- without holding any inquiry into the matter about...

Tulsi Das Vs. Smt. Mooii Devi

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949 - Sections 36

Reported in : 2000(2)WLN307

Advocate for Respondent : Rameshwar Chouhan, Adv.

ORDERBhagwati Prasad, J.1. The present revision petition arises out of the decision of the trial Court dated 9-11-1995 whereby an application filed by the petitioner was dismissed by the trial Court.2. Learned counsel pressed before the...

Khayali Lal Vs. Mangi Lal

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Rajasthan Money Lenders Act, 1963 - Sections 2(9), 2(16), 22, 23 and 26

Reported in : AIR2006Raj26; 2005WLC(Raj)UC336

Advocate for Respondent : Rameshwar Chouhan, Adv.

Govind Mathur, J. 1. By this regular first appeal the plaintiff-appellant has given challenge to the judgment and decree dated 6-11-1985 passed by Additional District Judge, Rajsamand in Civil Original Suit No. 13/84 tilled as Khayali...

Madhya Pradesh State Road Trans. Corpn. Vs. Madan Kuwar and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2005ACJ1330; 2003(4)MPLJ6

Advocate for Respondent : Y.K. Munshi, Adv.

Bhawani Singh, C.J.1. Through these appeals, common award of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Sehore in M.C.C. Nos. 43 and 51 of 1986 dated 30.6.1992 has been challenged. Since both appeals arise out of the same accident,...

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Vilas Devi and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and IndustrialMotor Vehicles

Reported in : 2001ACJ950; 2001(2)WLC335; 2001(2)WLN286

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Rajvanshi, Adv.

Rajesh Balia, J. 1. Since these four special appeals raise common questions and, therefore, they were heard together and are being disposed of by a common judgment.2. The main contention raised in these special appeals is...