Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: ramesh thakur · Page 1 of about 45 results (0.044 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 29 2008

Bhanwar Singh @ Chhatar Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-29-2008

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : RLW2009(1)Raj382

Prakash Tatia, J.1. These three D.B. Criminal Appeals have been preferred to challenge the judgment and order dated 29.9.2004 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge.Bali passed in Sessions Case No. 61/99 (39/02), by which the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 13 2006

Bal Krishnan Sharma Vs. Tek Ram

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-13-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 to 147; ;Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1959 - Section 418; ;Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 378(4)

Reported in : I(2007)BC138,2006CriLJ1993

Advocate for Respondent : Ramesh Thakur, Adv.

K.C. Sood, J.1. Would a cheque Issued after the date of closure of an account in a Bank fall within the mischief of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act ('Act' for short) is the question...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 13 2006

Bal Krishan Sharma Vs. Tek Ram

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-13-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138 to 147; ;Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act, 1988; ;Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1959 - Section 418; ;Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 378(4)

Reported in : 2006(1)ShimLC385

Advocate for Respondent : Ramesh Thakur, Adv.

K.C. Sood, J.1. Would a cheque issued after the date of closure of an account in a Bank fall within the mischief of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act? ('Act' for short) is the question...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 26 2014

Madhuri NitIn Jadhav and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through Its ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-26-2014

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. V.A. Gangal

AnoopV. Mohta, J. 1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned counsel appearing for the respective Respondents waive service. Heard finally, by consent of the parties. 2. All these Petitions revolve around the issues relating to and connected to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 2023

Balaram Vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-08-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

2023 INSC1000NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2300 OF2009BALARAM …APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH …RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT B.R. GAVAI, J.1. This appeal challenges the judgment and order passed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 2007

Kaushalya Devi and anr. Vs. Bhag Chand

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-10-2007

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2008(I)ShimLC9

Deepak Gupta, J.1. This Criminal Revision is directed against the order of the learned Sessions Judge, Kullu, dated 1.12.2000 in Criminal Revision No. 5 of 1999 whereby he allowed the revision petition filed by the husband,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 2013

Ramesh Thakur Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-24-2013

Subject : Education

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:27. h February, 2013 Judgment delivered on:24. h May, 2013 CRL.M.C. 2019/2011 RAMESH THAKUR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Dubey, Mr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 2001

Dhan Ji Ahir and ors. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-17-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 201, 302, 307, 323 and 324; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2002CriLJ1853

Advocate for Respondent : A.G.A. and ;L.P. Singh, Adv.

J.C. Gupta, J.1. Both these appeals are directed against one and the same Judgment dated 7-6-1989 passed by the then I Addl. Sessions Judge, Ballia in Sessions Trial No. 79 of 1989 whereby appellants Dhan Ji...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 2009

Dheeraj Verma and anr. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-02-2009

Subject : Criminal

Surinder Singh, J.1. The challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of conviction and sentence under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, passed in S.T. No. 55 of 2003 on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 2012

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Rakesh Kumar Sharma and Others

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-06-2012

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Anup Chitkara

Surinder Singh, J. (Oral) 1. The acquittal of the respondents passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Shimla for the offences under Sections 498-A, 306 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial