Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: ram nath and · Page 1 of about 1,626 results (0.295 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 22 1975

Pratap Kumar Vs. the State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-22-1975

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1976CriLJ818

Gurnam Singh, J.1. Partap Kumar son of Prem Chand, and Madan Mohan Malhotra son of Ram Saran Dass, residents of Jullundur and Ram Nath son of Girdhari Lai resident ol Dhampur (U.P.), were tried for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 1994

Ram Nath Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-29-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1)

Reported in : 1994IIIAD(Delhi)1223; 1994(31)DRJ238

Anil Dev Singh, J.(1) This judgment will dispose of two criminal appeals being Cr.A.No-280 and 281 of 1979-These appeals are directed against the judgment and order of the learned Special Judge, Delhi, dated November 15,1979 whereby...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 02 2000

Pokuri Venkata Subba Rao Vs. Vinnakota Peda Nageswara Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-02-2000

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Rules, 1961 - Rules 9 and 23; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 24, 38, 39 and 99; Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1961 - Sections - 10, 12, 13, 14, 20, 21, 22 and 30; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rules 6 and 22 - Order 2, Rule 2; Delhi and Ajmir Rent Control Act, 1952 - Sections 15

Reported in : 2000(2)ALD249; 2000(2)ALT73

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. M.V.S. Suresh Kumar for G.V.L.K. Murthy, Adv.

1. This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 25-3-1998 passed by the Rent Controller, Vijayawada, dismissing an application filed by the petitioner herein to recall the warrant for delivery of the property issued...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 10 1975

Partap Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-10-1975

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 109 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 342; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 and 105

Reported in : AIR1976SC966; (1976)2SCC798; [1976]1SCR757

Advocate for Respondent : D.P. Uniyal and ; O.P. Rana, Advs.

R.S. Sarkaria, J. 1. This appeal by special leave is directed against a Judgment of the High Court of Allahabad dismissing the appeal of Partap appellant and maintaining his conviction under Section 302, Penal Code. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 1996

Youth Welfare Federation Rep. by Its Chairman, K.J. Prasad Vs. Union o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-09-1996

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 2, 10, 22 and 26; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(3), 14, 15 , 19(2) to 19(6), 21, 44, 141, 366, 366(10), 372, 372(1), 372(2), 372(3) and 395; Personal Law; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 292 and 293; Administrative Law; Constitutional Law; Indian Divorce (Amendment) Act, 1927; Indian Divorce (Amendment) Act, 1948; Indian Divorce (Amendment) Act, 1950; Indian Divorce (Amendment) Act, 1912; Indian Divorce (Amendment) Act, 1926; Indian Divorce (Amendment) Act, 1951; Indian Independence Act, 1947 - Schedule - Article 395; International Law; National Law

Reported in : 1996(4)ALT1138

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. L. Ravichander

Lingaraja Rath, J.1. Questions of deep significance, some of which in many respects are perplexing in nature have teen referred to this Bench in the context of consideration of the vires of Sections 10 and 22...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 1969

Delhi Administration Vs. Ram Nath Aggarwal

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-08-1969

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 530

Reported in : 1969CriLJ1279; 6(1970)DLT212

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. A. S. R. Chari

Jagjit Singh, J.(1) By his judgment, dated January 17, 1964, Shri Amba Prakash, Magistrate First Class, Delhi, acquitted Ram Nath Aggarwal and two others who had been tried by him on various charges. An appeal against...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 1935

Emperor Vs. Ram Nath and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-26-1935

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1935All989; 159Ind.Cas.290

Harries, J.1. The 13 appellants in Criminal Appeal No. 1046 of 1934, were convicted by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge of the Etawah District of an offence under Section 399, Penal Code. The appellant, Ram Nath,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 2000

Nathu Ram Rathour Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Dec-08-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 323 and 325; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 397 and 401; Probation of Offenders Act

Reported in : 2001(1)MPHT1(CG)

ORDERR.S. Garg, J. 1. By this petition, under Section 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the applicant seeks to challenge his conviction recorded under Sections 323 and 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code and the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 26 1934

Bacha Babu and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-26-1934

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1935All162

Harris, J.1. In this case which has been referred to as the Agra Conspiracy Case all six appellants were charged with conspiracy, the charge being that between February 1931 and August 1932 at Agra, they jointly...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 26 1934

Bachcha Babu and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-26-1934

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 155Ind.Cas.369

1. In this case which has been referred to as the Agra Conspiracy Case all six appellants were charged with conspiracy, the charge being that between February 1931 and August 1932 at Agra, they jointly and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial