Advanced Search Results
Pratap Kumar Vs. the State of Punjab
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-22-1975
Criminal
1976CriLJ818
Gurnam Singh, J.1. Partap Kumar son of Prem Chand, and Madan Mohan Malhotra son of Ram Saran Dass, residents of Jullundur and Ram Nath son of Girdhari Lai resident ol Dhampur (U.P.), were tried for the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Nath Vs. State
Delhi
Jul-29-1994
Criminal
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1)
1994IIIAD(Delhi)1223; 1994(31)DRJ238
Anil Dev Singh, J.(1) This judgment will dispose of two criminal appeals being Cr.A.No-280 and 281 of 1979-These appeals are directed against the judgment and order of the learned Special Judge, Delhi, dated November 15,1979 whereby...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPokuri Venkata Subba Rao Vs. Vinnakota Peda Nageswara Rao
Andhra Pradesh
Feb-02-2000
TenancyCivil
Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Rules, 1961 - Rules 9 and 23; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 24, 38, 39 and 99; Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1961 - Sections - 10, 12, 13, 14, 20, 21, 22 and 30; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rules 6 and 22 - Order 2, Rule 2; Delhi and Ajmir Rent Control Act, 1952 - Sections 15
2000(2)ALD249; 2000(2)ALT73
Mr. M.V.S. Suresh Kumar for G.V.L.K. Murthy, Adv.
1. This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 25-3-1998 passed by the Rent Controller, Vijayawada, dismissing an application filed by the petitioner herein to recall the warrant for delivery of the property issued...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Partap Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
Sep-10-1975
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 109 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 342; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 and 105
AIR1976SC966; (1976)2SCC798; [1976]1SCR757
D.P. Uniyal and ; O.P. Rana, Advs.
R.S. Sarkaria, J. 1. This appeal by special leave is directed against a Judgment of the High Court of Allahabad dismissing the appeal of Partap appellant and maintaining his conviction under Section 302, Penal Code. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskYouth Welfare Federation Rep. by Its Chairman, K.J. Prasad Vs. Union o ...
Andhra Pradesh
Oct-09-1996
Constitution
Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 2, 10, 22 and 26; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(3), 14, 15 , 19(2) to 19(6), 21, 44, 141, 366, 366(10), 372, 372(1), 372(2), 372(3) and 395; Personal Law; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 292 and 293; Administrative Law; Constitutional Law; Indian Divorce (Amendment) Act, 1927; Indian Divorce (Amendment) Act, 1948; Indian Divorce (Amendment) Act, 1950; Indian Divorce (Amendment) Act, 1912; Indian Divorce (Amendment) Act, 1926; Indian Divorce (Amendment) Act, 1951; Indian Independence Act, 1947 - Schedule - Article 395; International Law; National Law
1996(4)ALT1138
Mr. L. Ravichander
Lingaraja Rath, J.1. Questions of deep significance, some of which in many respects are perplexing in nature have teen referred to this Bench in the context of consideration of the vires of Sections 10 and 22...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDelhi Administration Vs. Ram Nath Aggarwal
Delhi
May-08-1969
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 530
1969CriLJ1279; 6(1970)DLT212
Shri. A. S. R. Chari
Jagjit Singh, J.(1) By his judgment, dated January 17, 1964, Shri Amba Prakash, Magistrate First Class, Delhi, acquitted Ram Nath Aggarwal and two others who had been tried by him on various charges. An appeal against...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmperor Vs. Ram Nath and ors.
Allahabad
Aug-26-1935
Criminal
AIR1935All989; 159Ind.Cas.290
Harries, J.1. The 13 appellants in Criminal Appeal No. 1046 of 1934, were convicted by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge of the Etawah District of an offence under Section 399, Penal Code. The appellant, Ram Nath,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNathu Ram Rathour Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh
Dec-08-2000
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 323 and 325; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 397 and 401; Probation of Offenders Act
2001(1)MPHT1(CG)
ORDERR.S. Garg, J. 1. By this petition, under Section 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the applicant seeks to challenge his conviction recorded under Sections 323 and 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code and the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBacha Babu and ors. Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Nov-26-1934
Criminal
AIR1935All162
Harris, J.1. In this case which has been referred to as the Agra Conspiracy Case all six appellants were charged with conspiracy, the charge being that between February 1931 and August 1932 at Agra, they jointly...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBachcha Babu and ors. Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Nov-26-1934
Criminal
155Ind.Cas.369
1. In this case which has been referred to as the Agra Conspiracy Case all six appellants were charged with conspiracy, the charge being that between February 1931 and August 1932 at Agra, they jointly and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »