Advanced Search Results

Kamal Singh Thakur Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 20, 41, 42, 43, 50 and 50(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 24 and 25

Reported in : 2000(1)MPHT439

Advocate for Respondent : D.S. Thakur, Adv.

R.S. Garg, J.1. Being aggrieved by the judgment dated 6-10-98 passed in Special Case No. 64/98 by the learned Special Judge (N.D.P.S.) Raipur convicting the appellant under Section 20(b)(1)/8 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances...

Sanjeev Gupta & Ors vs.manoj Loharia

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Nazim U. Ahmed

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:15. h May, 2018. CS(OS) 619/2016 SANJEEV GUPTA & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Lalit Gupta, Mr. Siddharth and Mr. Akshit. Katyaal,...

Ashok Kumar & Anr vs.ram Avtar Gupta

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h July, 2017 RC.REV. 308/2017 ASHOK KUMAR & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sachin Puri, Mr. Sanjeev Nasiar and Ms. Mehak...

State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Raghuraj Singh

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 89 and 120; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 3 and 113; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 213; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 22, Rules 3, 4 and 9

Reported in : AIR1968Raj14

Advocate for Respondent : R.A. Gupta, Adv.

Modi, J.1. These two civil appeals arise out of a single judgment and decree of the Civil Judge, Bun'di, dated 14th October. 1958, in a suit for refund of money and we propose to dispose of...

Bimal Kumar and Another Vs. Vishram Lekhraj Menganani

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Companies Act; Central Sales Tax Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 415, 418 and 420

Reported in : 1990(2)BomCR65; 1990CriLJ444

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sirpurkar

ORDER1. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing the proceedings pending in Criminal Complaint No. 114/1988 in the Court of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, 3rd...

Date of Decision:-19.08.2013 Vs. Ram Avtar GuptA.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

Rs.No.5125 of 2012(O&M) #1# IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Date of Decision:-19.08.2013 Rs.No.5125 of 2012(O&M) Ram Krishan Goel......Appellant. Versus Ram Avtar Gupta......Respondent. AND Rs.No.1412 of 2013(O&M) Ram Krishan Goel......Appellant. Versus Ram...

Subodh Kumar Yaduvanshi vs.guddo Devi & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Arun Srivastava, Ms. Anupama, Mr. R.S. Kundu, Ms. Babita Seth

$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:25. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.676/2015 SUBODH KUMAR YADUVANSHI ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.C. Singhal, Adv. versus GUDDO DEVI & ORS. ...........

Anand Swaroop Ram Kumar Gupta Vs. the Union of India Through the Secre ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1), 10 and 11; Constitution of India - Article 22(5); Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1); Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 - Sections 14; General Clause Act, 1897 - Sections 21; National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 8(1) and 10

Reported in : 1998BomCR(Cri)321

Advocate for Respondent : Smt. V.K. Tahilramani, Adv.

ORDERA.V. Savant, J. 1. Having heard the learned Counsel for the parties, the application for amendment dated 16th January 1997 is granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. By consent, heard all the Counsel on all...

Ramachandra Vs. Daulatram

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115; Matsya Premises (Rent Control) Ordinance, 1948 - Sections 3 and 10

Reported in : AIR1952Raj59

Advocate for Respondent : Ram Avtar Gupta, Adv.

Dave, J.1. This is an application in revision under Section 115 C. P. C. by a tenant named Ram Chandra against the appellate order of the District Judge, Alwar, dated the 30th March 1950, reversing the...

Bhoransingh Vs. Revenue Board of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Debt Law; Rajasthan (Protection of Tenants) Ordinance, 1949 - Sections 7; Constitution of India - Article 15

Reported in : AIR1953Raj4

Advocate for Respondent : A.S. Chaturvedi, Adv. for Opposite Party No. 2 and Ram Avtar Gupta, Govt. Adv.

Ranawat, J. 1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The facts of this case are that Surajmal and Rawti filed an application under Section 7 of the Rajas-than Tenants' Protection...