Advanced Search Results
Punjab Urban Development Authority and ors. Vs. Dashmesh Educational S ...
Punjab and Haryana
Oct-12-2004
ConstitutionCivil
Constitution of India - Articles 77, 166 and 177; Punjab New Capital (Periphery) Control Act, 1952 - Sections 6(6); Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 - Sections 4, 5 and 11; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 35; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80 - Order 1, Rule 10; General Clause Act, 1897 - Sections 3(26); Transfer of Property Act, 1881 - Sections 2(6); Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 20; Forest Law
(2005)139PLR238
Rajive Atma Ram, Sr. Adv. for Respondent No. 1
Surya Kant, J.1. This judgment will dispose of Regular Second Appeal Nos. 4328 and 4345 of 2002, as not only common questions of facts and law are involved in these two Appeals but both have been...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSugalabai Vs. Gundappa A. Maradi and ors.
Karnataka
Sep-18-2007
Family
Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 4, 6 and 6(1); Hindu Succession (Karnataka Amendment) Act, 1990 - Sections 6A; Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 - Sections 3; Principal Act - Sections 6A, 8 and 23; Hindu Succession (Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act, 1986 - Sections 29A; Medical University Act - Sections 5(5); Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 10A and 10A(1); Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946; Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) (Amendment) Act, 1950; Government of India Act - Sections 107 and 107(2); Tamil Nadu Public Men (Criminal Misconduct) Act, 1973; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 5(1) and 5(2); Land Tribunals Act; Tenancy Act, ;Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 48A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 9, 100 and 133; Punjab
ILR2007KAR4790; 2008(2)KarLJ406
M. Ram Bhat, Sr. Adv. for R1, ;G. Balakrishna Shastry and ;K.S. Hemalekha Advs. for R1
V. Jagannathan, J.1. These two appeals are clubbed together and a common judgment is rendered in view of common question of law of considerable importance being raised concerning the question relating to a married daughter also...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCouncil of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, New Delhi ...
Karnataka
Jan-10-1991
Constitution
Chartered Accountant Act, 1949 - Sections 21 and 22; Constitution of India - Article 226; Sales Tax Act
AIR1991Kant380; 1991(1)KarLJ278
M. Ram Bhat, Adv.
ORDERK. Shivashankarabhat, J.1. This is matter which has come to this Court under Section 21(5) of the Chartered Accountant Act, 1949 (for short `the Act'). The respondent is a Chartered Accountant.For the take of convenience the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
P. Leelavathy Vs. P. Sharada Devi @ P. Sumitra and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Oct-13-2009
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rule 7
2010(1)ALT89
K. Ram Reddy, Adv.
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The appellant filed O.S. No. 2034 of 2005 in the Court of II Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, against the respondents, for the relief of declaration of tide, in respect...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMarthala Ramachandra Reddy Vs. Mutyalapati Pedda Subbanna @ Venkata Su ...
Andhra Pradesh
Nov-10-2005
Civil
Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17 and 49; Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(1) and 35
2006(1)ALT132
K. Sita Ram, Adv. for Respondent No. 1
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. This court ordered notice before admission on 6-10-2005 and granted interim stay for a limited period. In pursuance there of, Sri Seetha Ram, learned counsel entered appearance on behalf of the first respondent....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTahsildar Singh Vs. State
Allahabad
Sep-11-1957
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 154, 367, 512 and 512(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 5 and 32(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 53
AIR1958All214; 1958CriLJ324
K.L. Misra, Adv. General, ;K.N. Srivastava, A.G.A. and ;Pt. Ram Asrey Misra, Adv.
Mukerji, J. 1. This is an appeal by Tahsildar Singh, aged about 39 years, resident of Khera Rathore, Police Station Bah, District Agra, against his conviction by the learned Additional Sessions Judge of Etawah. The trial...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Singh and ors. Vs. Punjab State Now Haryana State
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-24-1975
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1), 18, 18(2), 23 and 54
AIR1976P& H205
Ram Lal Aggarwal and; O.P. Hoshiar Puri, Advs.
Pritam Singh Pattar, J.1. By this judgment the following two regular first appeals which are directed against two separate awards dated August 29, 1966, of the Additional District Judge, Ambala will be disposed of, as common...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSumer Chand S/O Late Sardha Ram Vs. Ram Kishan Kaura and Others
Punjab and Haryana
Feb-20-1990
Family Property
Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14 and 14(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7, Rule 16 - Order 41, Rule 33; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 58 and 65
AIR1991P& H103
Mr. Ram Kishan Kaura, Adv.
1. This appeal is by the defendant filed against the judgment and decree of the Additional District Judge, Kurukshetra, dated Dec. 16, 1986, whereby suit filed by Ram Kishan Kaura and others was partly decreed as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBabu Singh and ors. Vs. Ram Sahai @ Ram Singh
Supreme Court of India
Apr-30-2008
Property
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68, 69 and 71; Indian Succession Act - Sections 63 and 63(1); Transfer of Property Act - Sections 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 16, Rule 10
AIR2008SC2485; 2008(3)AWC2825; (SCSuppl)2008(4)CHN140; (2008)7MLJ263(SC); 2008(7)SCALE743; 2008(4)CivilLJ; 755; 2008(3)Supreme314; 2008(4)LH(SC)2513; 2008(3)ICC607; 2008(3)KCCRSN192
N. Shoba, ; Sri Ram J. Thalapathy and ; V. Adhimoolam,
S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Interpretation of Section 69 of the Evidence Act, 1872 is in question in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 11.11.2005 passed by the High Court of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Hiraram and ors.
Rajasthan
Sep-13-2002
Motor VehiclesCivil
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 173
II(2003)ACC605; 2005ACJ1339; AIR2003Raj188; 2003(2)WLC669; 2003(1)WLN495
Sumeet Mehta and; Paras Ram, Advs.
B.S. Chauhan, J.1. This Misc. Appeal has been preferred against the impugned award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (hereinafter called as the Tribunal) Merta dated 10-12-98 by which a sum of Rs. 1,50,000/-along with interest...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »