Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: rakesh dwivedi · Page 1 of about 384 results (0.059 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 25 1992

Smt. Nirmal Swaran Singh Vs. Rozu-ud-dIn and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-25-1992

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 10, 98 and 575; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 3; Constitution of India, Article 14; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1953; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1882 - Sections 575; Mysore High Court Regulation, 1884 - Sections 15(3)

Reported in : AIR1993All121

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Adv.

1. Suit No. 432 of 1990 Rozu-ud-din and another v. Smt. Nirmal Swaran Singh was filed in the court of Civil Judge, Saharanpur, for specific performance of a contract dated 20-9-1985. The suit was transferred to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 2005

Prof. Yashpal and anr. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-11-2005

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : AIR2005SC2026; 2005(2)ESC129; JT2005(2)SC165; (2005)5SCC420; [2005] 2 SCR 23

G.P. Mathur, J.1. Professor Yashpal, an eminent Scientist and former Chairman of University Grants Commission, has filed Writ Petition No.19 of 2004 under Article 32 of the Constitution by way of public interest litigation for declaring...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2008

Tata Teleservices Ltd. Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-30-2008

Subject : Media and Communication

Acts : Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 - Sections 11, 11(1), 13 and 36; Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Amendment) Act, 2000; Indian Telegraph Act - Sections 4; Telecommunication Interconnection Usage Charges Regulations, 2003 - Rule 6

Reported in : 2008BusLR482(SC); (2008)2CompLJ405(SC); JT2008(5)SC657; 2008(6)SCALE523; (2008)10SCC556; [2008] 7 SCR 308

S.H. Kapadia, J.1. The controversy in these civil appeals is: whether appellant is liable to pay Access Deficit Charges ('ADC') to BSNL for the period commencing from 14.11.2004 to 26.8.2005 in respect of its service provided...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 09 2007

Mrs. Usha Saini Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-09-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Delhi School Education Act, 1973 - Sections 8(1) and 13; Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 - Rule 100; Constitution of India - Articles 51A and 226

Reported in : 142(2007)DLT397

Advocate for Respondent : Avnish Ahlawat and ; Nidhi Gupta, Advs. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and ;

Kailash Gambhir, J.1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the result of the DPC held on 17.2.2006 whereby the petitioner was declared not suitable for the post of Principal. The petitioner has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 2012

Ms. Purbanchal Cables and Conductors Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assam State Electri ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-10-2012

Subject : LimitationConstitution

Acts : Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993 - Section 1(3), 2(b), 3, 4, 5, 6(1)(2), 10; Limitation Act 1963 - Section 14, 10, 29 (2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Section 34; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Section 61; Interest Act, 1978 - Section 3; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 61(2); Gaming Act, 1845 - Section 18; Trade Disputes Act, 1906 - Section 4; Constitution of India - Articles 141; Indian Contracts Act - Section 62

H.L. DATTU, J.1. Since the issues in these appeals are common, they are disposed of by this common judgment and order. Factual background of the two appeals2. The facts in brief needs to be stated for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 12 1990

Radhey Shyam Sharma Vs. Regional Transport Authority, Kathgodam, Naini ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-12-1990

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 59, 69, 77, 79, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 88, 88(12) and (14) and 89; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 19(1); Central Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Rules, 1989 - Rules 88 and 88(2); National Permits Rules, 1975 - Rule 6; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 47(1B), (1D), (1F) and (1G), 51, 51(2), 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59A, 60, 61, 63(11) and (15) and 64; Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1980 - Rule 88; Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1976; Uttar Pradesh Motor Vehicles Rules - Rule 63(1)

Reported in : AIR1991All158

Advocate for Respondent : Standing Counsel

ORDERR.A. Sharma, J.1. By these writ petitions, petitioners, who are holding national permits for carriage of goods, have challenged the validity of R.6 of National Permit Rules, 1975, framed under S. 63(11) of the Motor Vehicles...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 07 1999

M/S. B.R. Enterprises Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-07-1999

Subject : ConstitutionCommercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(6), 40, 47, 53, 73, 162, 245, 246, 248, 258, 266, 269(3), 276, 286(3), 292, 293, 298, 301, 302, 303 and 304; Lotteries(Regulation) Act, 1998 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 12(3); Government of India Act, 1935; U.P. Unauthorized Lottery(Prevention) Act, 1995 - Sections 8;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 294A; English Lotteries Act, 1823; Common Wealth of Australian Constitution Act, - Sections 21, 73 and 92; Lotteries and Amusements Act, 1976; Lotteries and Art Unions Act, 1901-1929;

Reported in : AIR1999SC1867; JT1999(3)SC431; 1999(3)SCALE171; [1999]2SCR1111

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R.F. Nariman, Shri. Rajeev Dhawan

A.P. Misra, J. 1. Special leave granted in all the special leave petitions. We are witnessing in this case exhibition of Federalism in true spirit. Contrary to the usual pouring in of citizen's writ petitions for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 2006

Kanchan and ors. Vs. State Transport Appellate Tribunal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-17-2006

Subject : CommercialCivil

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 68(3)

Reported in : I(2006)ACC580; AIR2006SC3444; 2006(2)ALT7(SC); 2006(2)AWC1348(SC); [2006(2)JCR127(SC)]; 2006(1)JKJ15[SC]; JT2006(2)SC152; (2006)2MLJ285(SC); 2006(2)SCALE113; (2006)2SCC413

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Challenge in these appeals is to a composite order of a learned single Judge of the Allahabad High Court dismissing the writ petitions filed by the present appellants. The basic question before the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 07 1999

B.R. Enterprises Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-07-1999

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 298, 301, 303; Lotteries(Regulation) Act, 1998 - Sections 4 and 5; India Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 4 and 294A

Reported in : (2000)1GLR242; (1999)9SCC700; [2000]120STC302(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R.F. Nariman, Shri. Rajeev Dhawan

A.P. Misra, J.1. Special leave granted in all the special leave petitions.2. We are witnessing in this case exhibition of Federalism in true spirit. Contrary to the usual pouring in of citizen's writ petitions for vending...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 1999

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Through Registrar Vs. Sarnam Sin ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-15-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Rules of Court, 1952; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 399/402; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25; Constitution of India - Articles 235 and 309; Uttar Pradesh Judicial Officers (Retirement on Superannuation) Rules, 1992 - Rules 2, 4 and 56

Reported in : [2000(84)FLR444]; JT1999(10)SC99; 1999(7)SCALE502; (2000)2SCC339; [1999]Supp5SCR344; 2000(1)LC196(SC); (2000)1UPLBEC242

Advocate for Respondent : P.P. Rao and ; Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Advs.

S. Saghir Ahmad, J.1. Leave granted.2. Sarnam Singh (respondent No. 1), who shall hereinafter be referred to as respondent, was compulsorily retired from service by order dated 12.11.1997 passed by the State Government on the recommendation...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial