Advanced Search Results
Smt. Nirmal Swaran Singh Vs. Rozu-ud-dIn and Others
Allahabad
Nov-25-1992
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 10, 98 and 575; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 3; Constitution of India, Article 14; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1953; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1882 - Sections 575; Mysore High Court Regulation, 1884 - Sections 15(3)
AIR1993All121
Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Adv.
1. Suit No. 432 of 1990 Rozu-ud-din and another v. Smt. Nirmal Swaran Singh was filed in the court of Civil Judge, Saharanpur, for specific performance of a contract dated 20-9-1985. The suit was transferred to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskProf. Yashpal and anr. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-11-2005
Constitution
AIR2005SC2026; 2005(2)ESC129; JT2005(2)SC165; (2005)5SCC420; [2005] 2 SCR 23
G.P. Mathur, J.1. Professor Yashpal, an eminent Scientist and former Chairman of University Grants Commission, has filed Writ Petition No.19 of 2004 under Article 32 of the Constitution by way of public interest litigation for declaring...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTata Teleservices Ltd. Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-30-2008
Media and Communication
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 - Sections 11, 11(1), 13 and 36; Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Amendment) Act, 2000; Indian Telegraph Act - Sections 4; Telecommunication Interconnection Usage Charges Regulations, 2003 - Rule 6
2008BusLR482(SC); (2008)2CompLJ405(SC); JT2008(5)SC657; 2008(6)SCALE523; (2008)10SCC556; [2008] 7 SCR 308
S.H. Kapadia, J.1. The controversy in these civil appeals is: whether appellant is liable to pay Access Deficit Charges ('ADC') to BSNL for the period commencing from 14.11.2004 to 26.8.2005 in respect of its service provided...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mrs. Usha Saini Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Delhi
Jul-09-2007
Service
Delhi School Education Act, 1973 - Sections 8(1) and 13; Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 - Rule 100; Constitution of India - Articles 51A and 226
142(2007)DLT397
Avnish Ahlawat and ; Nidhi Gupta, Advs. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and ;
Kailash Gambhir, J.1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the result of the DPC held on 17.2.2006 whereby the petitioner was declared not suitable for the post of Principal. The petitioner has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMs. Purbanchal Cables and Conductors Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assam State Electri ...
Supreme Court of India
Jul-10-2012
LimitationConstitution
Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993 - Section 1(3), 2(b), 3, 4, 5, 6(1)(2), 10; Limitation Act 1963 - Section 14, 10, 29 (2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Section 34; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Section 61; Interest Act, 1978 - Section 3; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 61(2); Gaming Act, 1845 - Section 18; Trade Disputes Act, 1906 - Section 4; Constitution of India - Articles 141; Indian Contracts Act - Section 62
H.L. DATTU, J.1. Since the issues in these appeals are common, they are disposed of by this common judgment and order. Factual background of the two appeals2. The facts in brief needs to be stated for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRadhey Shyam Sharma Vs. Regional Transport Authority, Kathgodam, Naini ...
Allahabad
Nov-12-1990
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 59, 69, 77, 79, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 88, 88(12) and (14) and 89; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 19(1); Central Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Rules, 1989 - Rules 88 and 88(2); National Permits Rules, 1975 - Rule 6; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 47(1B), (1D), (1F) and (1G), 51, 51(2), 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59A, 60, 61, 63(11) and (15) and 64; Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1980 - Rule 88; Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1976; Uttar Pradesh Motor Vehicles Rules - Rule 63(1)
AIR1991All158
Standing Counsel
ORDERR.A. Sharma, J.1. By these writ petitions, petitioners, who are holding national permits for carriage of goods, have challenged the validity of R.6 of National Permit Rules, 1975, framed under S. 63(11) of the Motor Vehicles...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. B.R. Enterprises Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
May-07-1999
ConstitutionCommercial
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(6), 40, 47, 53, 73, 162, 245, 246, 248, 258, 266, 269(3), 276, 286(3), 292, 293, 298, 301, 302, 303 and 304; Lotteries(Regulation) Act, 1998 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 12(3); Government of India Act, 1935; U.P. Unauthorized Lottery(Prevention) Act, 1995 - Sections 8;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 294A; English Lotteries Act, 1823; Common Wealth of Australian Constitution Act, - Sections 21, 73 and 92; Lotteries and Amusements Act, 1976; Lotteries and Art Unions Act, 1901-1929;
AIR1999SC1867; JT1999(3)SC431; 1999(3)SCALE171; [1999]2SCR1111
Mr. R.F. Nariman, Shri. Rajeev Dhawan
A.P. Misra, J. 1. Special leave granted in all the special leave petitions. We are witnessing in this case exhibition of Federalism in true spirit. Contrary to the usual pouring in of citizen's writ petitions for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKanchan and ors. Vs. State Transport Appellate Tribunal and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-17-2006
CommercialCivil
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 68(3)
I(2006)ACC580; AIR2006SC3444; 2006(2)ALT7(SC); 2006(2)AWC1348(SC); [2006(2)JCR127(SC)]; 2006(1)JKJ15[SC]; JT2006(2)SC152; (2006)2MLJ285(SC); 2006(2)SCALE113; (2006)2SCC413
Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Challenge in these appeals is to a composite order of a learned single Judge of the Allahabad High Court dismissing the writ petitions filed by the present appellants. The basic question before the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB.R. Enterprises Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
May-07-1999
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 298, 301, 303; Lotteries(Regulation) Act, 1998 - Sections 4 and 5; India Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 4 and 294A
(2000)1GLR242; (1999)9SCC700; [2000]120STC302(SC)
Mr. R.F. Nariman, Shri. Rajeev Dhawan
A.P. Misra, J.1. Special leave granted in all the special leave petitions.2. We are witnessing in this case exhibition of Federalism in true spirit. Contrary to the usual pouring in of citizen's writ petitions for vending...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHigh Court of Judicature at Allahabad Through Registrar Vs. Sarnam Sin ...
Supreme Court of India
Dec-15-1999
Service
Rules of Court, 1952; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 399/402; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25; Constitution of India - Articles 235 and 309; Uttar Pradesh Judicial Officers (Retirement on Superannuation) Rules, 1992 - Rules 2, 4 and 56
[2000(84)FLR444]; JT1999(10)SC99; 1999(7)SCALE502; (2000)2SCC339; [1999]Supp5SCR344; 2000(1)LC196(SC); (2000)1UPLBEC242
P.P. Rao and ; Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Advs.
S. Saghir Ahmad, J.1. Leave granted.2. Sarnam Singh (respondent No. 1), who shall hereinafter be referred to as respondent, was compulsorily retired from service by order dated 12.11.1997 passed by the State Government on the recommendation...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »