Advanced Search Results

Bank of Baroda Vs. Ghemarbhai Harjibhai Rabari

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 25A, 25G and 25H

Reported in : AIR2005SC2799; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)492; [2005(105)FLR383]; [2005(3)JCR62(SC)]; JT2005(3)SC312; (2005)IILLJ475SC; (2005)10SCC792; 2005(2)LC1020(SC); (2005)2UPLBEC1671

Advocate for Respondent : Rajeev Dhawan, Sr. Adv., ; Sanjay Kapur, ; Rajiv Kapur and

N. Santosh Hegde, J.1. This appeal arises out of a reference made to the Central Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad, in regard to the termination of services of the respondent herein. Said reference culminated in an award directing...

Union of India and Others Etc. Vs. Virpal Singh Chauhan Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 16(4) and 335; Statutory Rules - Rules 3 and 123;Air Corporations Act, 1953 - Sections 7, 15, 34(1), 44 and 45

Reported in : AIR1996SC448; JT1995(7)SC231; (1995)6SCC684; [1995]Supp4SCR158; (1995)3UPLBEC1983

ORDERB.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.C.A. Nos. 9272-73 & 9277 of 1995 (arising out ofS.Leave granted in Special Leave Petitions.1. These appeals/writ petitions raise an important but difficult question concerning the nature of rule of reservation in promotions...

R.C. Sahi and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 - Rule 105(iv-A); Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1955 - Rule 8; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 309; Emergency Commissioned Officers and Short-Service Commissioned Officers (Reservation and Vacancies) Rules, 1967

Reported in : 1999(1)BLJR250; JT1998(7)SC527; 1998(6)SCALE96; (1999)1SCC482; [1998]Supp2SCR612; 1999(2)SLJ39(SC); 1999(1)LC228(SC); (1999)1UPLBEC314

ORDER1. Writ Petition (C) No. 211/97 under Article 32 of the Constitution of India has been filed with a prayer to issue a writ of mandamus to the respondents 1 and 2 to implement the judgment...

Kailash Chand Sharma Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Rajasthan Panchayat Raj Rules, 1996 - Rule 273; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 15(1), 15(2), 15(4), 16, 16(2), 16(3), 16(4), 32, 141, 142 and 226; Public Employment (Requirement as to Residence) Act, 1957 - Sections 3 ;Andhra Pradesh public employment (Requirement as to Residence) Rules

Reported in : AIR2002SC2877; [2002(95)FLR689]; [2003(1)JCR87(SC)]; JT2002(5)SC591; 2002LabIC2943; 2002(5)SCALE512; (2002)6SCC562; [2002]SUPP1SCR317; 2003(1)SLJ121(SC); (2002)3UPLBEC2281

P. Venkatarama Reddi, J.1. Leave to appeal granted, Consequently, the appeals are taken on file and being disposed of by this common Judgment.2. The selections held and the consequential appointments made to the posts of primary...

Suraj Bhan Meena and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Articles 309,

1. Since common questions of fact and law are involved, five Special Leave Petitions have been taken up for hearing and final disposal together. While SLP(C)No.6385 of 2010 has been filed by Suraj Bhan Meena &...

Aligarh Muslim University and ors. Vs. Mansoor Ali Khan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceLabour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Aligarh Muslim University Revised Leave Rules 1969 - Rule 5(8); Aligarh University Non-Teaching Employees (Terms and Conditions of Services) Rules, 1972 - Rule 10C

Reported in : AIR2000SC2783; [2001(91)FLR28]; JT2000(9)SC502; 2000(6)SCALE125; (2000)7SCC529; [2000]Supp2SCR684; (2000)3UPLBEC2234

Advocate for Respondent : Rajeev Dhawan, Sr. Adv.; Chandrasekhar, ; Pramod Swarup,

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.1. Leave granted.2. These two Appeals have been preferred by the Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh. In the Civil Appeal arising out of SLP (C) No. 12700/99, the respondent is Mr. Mansoor Ali Khan,...

Ashok Kumar Sonkar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Banaras Hindu University Act, 1915 - Sections 5, 5(2) to 5(6), 5(7), 6(2), 6(7) and 17; Public Service Commission Rules - Rule 37; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 142

Reported in : 2007(3)AWC2846(SC); JT2007(6)SC127; 2007(3)SCALE517; (2007)4SCC54; 2007(3)SLJ420(SC); [2007] 3 SCR 95

Advocate for Respondent : G.E. Vahanvati, S.G., ; Rajeev Dhawan, Sr. Adv., ; Devadatt K

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Banaras Hindu University (for short, 'the University) issued an advertisement on 25.03.1995, iner alia, for filling up a vacant post of lecturer in Tridosa Vigyan in the Department of Basic Principles. Relevant clauses...

State of M.P. and ors. Vs. V.V. Ashthana and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Ashaskiya Shikshan Sanstha (Adhyapakon Tatha Anya Karamchariyaon Ke Vetano Ka Sandaya) Adhiniyam, 1978; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 21

Advocate for Respondent : Rajeev Dhawan, Sr. Adv., ; Rekha Pandey, ; Ambika Dass, A

1. State of Madhya Pradesh, the original petitioner in the Special Leave Petition, has renewed its prayer for Stay. In the above said Special Leave Petition, a notice is already issued on the limited point as...

Manda Jaganath Vs. K.S. Rathnam and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 324 and 329; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 15, 30, 36, 81, 100 and 100(1); Representation of the People Rules; Representation of the People Orders; Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961 - Rule 4; Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968

Reported in : AIR2004SC3600; 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)527; 2004(5)ALT28(SC); JT2004(5)SC8; 2004(4)SCALE600; (2004)7SCC492

Advocate for Respondent : Rajeev Dhawan, Sr. Adv., ; R. Santhana Krishnan, ; G. Sateesh

N. Santosh Hegde, J.1. Leave granted.2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.3. The first respondent herein filed his nomination to contest elections to the Parliament from 28 Nagarkurnool (SC) Constituency. On 2.4.2004 when the said nomination...

Deokinandan Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : State Bank of India Supervising Staff Service Rules - Rule 49

Reported in : AIR2001SC1767; [2001(89)FLR732]; JT2001(4)SC533; 2001LabIC1704; (2001)ILLJ1589SC; RLW2001(2)SC213; 2001(3)SCALE294; (2001)5SCC340; 2001(2)SCT813(SC); (2001)2UPLBEC1498

Advocate for Respondent : Rajeev Dhawan, Sr. Adv., ; Sanjay Kapur and ; Ms. Shubhra Kap

ORDERB.N. Agrawal,J.1. This appeal by special leave has been preferred challenging the order passed by a Division Bench of Delhi High Court in a Letters Patent Appeal Whereby the same was dismissed upholding an order passed...