Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: raj sharma · Page 1 of about 378 results (0.112 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 09 1983

Jiwan Mal Kochar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-09-1983

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1983SC1102; (1983)4SCC148

A. Varadarajan, J.1. This appeal by special leave is by the appellant in Letters Patent Appeal 119 of 1971 which was dismissed by the Delhi High Court. The L.P.A. was filed by the appellant against the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 2015

Parhlad and Anr. Vs. The State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-03-2015

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Shekhar Raj Sharma

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.983 OF2015Parhlad and Anr. ... Appellant Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, J.The present appeal depicts a sordid situation and sketches a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 1989

Punjab State Electricity Board, Patiala and Another Vs. Ashok Kumar Se ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-13-1989

Subject : Constitution Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 32, 136, 136(1), 141, 142, 215, 226, 309, 311 and 330; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 96; Punjab Public Works Department (Electricity Branch) Provincial Services Class III (Subordinate Posts) Rules, 1952 - Rules 6 and 9; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Punjab Electricity Board Service of Engineers (Civil) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 10(4)(6), (7) and (9); Limitation Act

Reported in : AIR1990P& H117; (1991)IILLJ165P& H

Advocate for Respondent : J.L. Gupta, Sr. Adv. and; Bhim Sen Sehgal,; Miss Nirmalj

ORDERM. M. Punchhi, J. 1. These 23 matters are indeed an assortment having common axis in Letters Patent-Appeal No. 402of 1988 which has arisen from a judgment rendered by M. R. Agnihotri, J., a learned Judge...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 19 2026

M/S Asha Enterprises Pvt Ltd Through Shri Varinder Kumar Sharma Direct ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-19-2026

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Varun Nischal, Ms. Saira Tagra, Mr. Shekhar Raj Sharma, Ms. Nidhi Narwal, Ms. Srishti Jain

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 19.01.2026+ ARB.P. 127/2024M/S ASHA ENTERPRISES PVT LTD THROUGH SHRI VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA DIRECTOR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Bansal, Adv.versusHINDUSTAN PREFAB LTD &...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2008

P.D. Sharma and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : Feb-20-2008

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. P. D. Sharma and sixteen others, who are Junior/Senior Hindi Translators in the Income Tax Department, which is a subordinate office of Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), in this Original Application filed by them...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 31 1995

Janak Raj Sharma Vs. Director of Inspection (investigation) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-31-1995

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 132, 132(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1995)111PLR140

Advocate for Respondent : R.P. Sawhney and; Aradhana Sawhney, Advs.

Jawaharlal Gupta, J.1. Is the search of the petitioner's premises vitiated on the ground that the competent authority had no information or material as contemplated under Section 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 This is the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 1986

Prabodh Verma and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-19-1986

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1986Supp(1)SCC674

E.S. Venkataramiah and; O. Chinnappa Reddy, JJ.1. Shri Brijendra Singh, Shri Radhey Shyam Sharma, Shri Sukhi Ram, Shri Rameshwar Dayal, Shri Mohan Lal, who are some of the petitioners in Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 6790-91 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 2002

Great Arts Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-26-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 147 and 148; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2002]257ITR639(Delhi)

Advocate for Respondent : R.D. Jolly, ; Ajay Jha and ; Rashmi Chopra, Advs.

S. Mukerjee, J.1. By this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the validity of notice dated March 27, 1976, issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), proposing to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2002

Great Arts (P) Ltd. Vs. Ito

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-24-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)175CTR(Del)121

S. Mukherjee, J.By this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the validity of notice dated 27-3-1976, issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), proposing to reassess the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 2008

Geeta and ors. Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-28-2008

Subject : Motar vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; Minimum Wages Act

Reported in : 2008(106)DRJ129

Advocate for Respondent : Pankaj Seth, Adv.

Kailash Gambhir, J.1. By way of the present appeal the appellants claimants seek to challenge the award dated 23.10.2003 so as to seek enhancement in the compensation amount over and above the amount of Rs. 3,60,000/-...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial