Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: raj kumar · Page 1 of about 8,546 results (0.340 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 03 2002

Manpyare and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-03-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 363, 366, 375 and 376

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3046; 2002(1)MPHT253; 2002(2)MPLJ11

Advocate for Respondent : Raj Kumar Verma, Panel Lawyer

Uma Nath Singh, J. 1. This is an appeal from the judgment and findings dated 21-11-89 passed by Second Additional Sessions Judge, Chhatarpur in the Sessions Trial No. 48/87 whereby the appellants were convicted for offences...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 16 2003

Surendra Prasad Misra Vs. Engineer-in-chief, Irrigation Department and ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-16-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 226 and 311

Reported in : (2004)2UPLBEC1479

Advocate for Respondent : Raj Kumar, Adv. and ;S.C.

R.B. Misra, J.1. Heard Sri U.S. Mishra learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Raj Kumar learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.2. The listing application is disposed of and the writ petition is being...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 2003

Jageshwar Prasad Tiwari Vs. Uttar Pradesh Roadways Transport Corporati ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-18-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 136 and 226; Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 - Rule 153; Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 - Sections 11(1); Broadcasting Act, 1981

Reported in : (2003)3UPLBEC2159

Advocate for Respondent : Rajiv Sharma, ;Raj Kumar and ;Sandeep Mukherji, Advs. and ;S.C.

R.B. Misra, J.1. Heard Sri R.P. Tiwari learned Counsel for the petitioner, as well as Sri Raj Kumar and Sri Sandeep Mukherjee, learned Standing Counsel.2. In this petition the orders dated 30.6.1994, 14.9.1994 and 20.5.1995 namely...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 06 1978

Sone Lal and ors. Vs. the State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-06-1978

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149, 201, 302, 323, 324 and 364; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313, 379 and 395

Reported in : AIR1978SC1142; 1978CriLJ1122; (1978)4SCC302; 1978(10)LC439(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : U.P. Uniyal, ; O.P. Rana, Adv.

S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, J. 1. This is an appeal under the provisions of the Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Jurisdiction) Act and Section 379 of the CrPC, 1973. The appellants Sone Lal, Ram Swaroop Chamar,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 22 2007

The Chief Commercial Manager, South Central Railway, Secunderabad and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-22-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Railway Services (Conduct) Rules, 1966 - Rule 3(1); Railway Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968 - Rule 25; Constitution of India - Articles 23 and 226

Reported in : AIR2007SC2976; 2007(6)ALD11(SC); JT2007(10)SC378; 2007(10)SCALE321; (2007)8SCC212; 2008(1)SLJ433(SC); 2008(1)LHSC501; 2007AIRSCW5419

Advocate for Respondent : A. Subba Rao, ; Raj Kumar Gupta, ; Sheo Kumar Gupta, ;

Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.1. These appeals by special leave filed by the Chief Commercial Manager, South Central Railway and Ors. appellants herein, are directed against the common judgment and order dated 4th day of September, 2002...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 1998

State of Haryana Vs. Nirmal Singh and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-29-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300 and 302

Reported in : 1999CriLJ662

Advocate for Respondent : R. Cheema, Sr. Adv. and; M. J.S. Waraich, Adv.

M.L. Singhal, J. 1. The prosecution case in brief is that Tale Ram s/o Nathan, Jat was resident of village Shahpur Turk, PS Sadar Sonepat. Smt. Krishna was his wife. They had three daughters named Nirmala,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 2002

Committee of Management, Prem Lal Singhania Kanya Inter College and an ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-12-2002

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC1554; (2002)3UPLBEC2450

Advocate for Respondent : Shailesh Verma, Adv. and ;Ashok Khare, S.C.

R.R. Yadav, J. 1. Heard Sri Raj Kumar Jain, learned counsel for petitioners, learned standing counsel as well as Sri Ashok Khare, learned senior counsel assisted by Sri Shailesh Verma representing respondent No. 4. 2. It...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 20 2004

Commissioner of Gift Tax Vs. Maharaja Amarinder Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-20-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Gift-tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2; Wealth Tax Act - Sections 4(6); Hindu Succession Act - Sections 5; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256(1)

Reported in : (2004)191CTR(P& H)358; [2005]274ITR381(P& H)

Advocate for Respondent : C.S. Aggarwal and; Arun Walia, Advs.

N.K. Sud, J.1. At the instance of the Revenue, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh (for short 'the Tribunal'), has referred the following question of law arising out of its order dt. 25th Oct., 1982...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 1969

Raj Kumar Mohan Singh and ors. Vs. Raj Kumar Pasupathinath Saran Singh ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-29-1969

Subject : Property

Acts : Oudh Estates Act, 1869 - Sections 22(6) and 22(7)

Reported in : AIR1969SC42; (1969)2SCC258; [1970]1SCR428

Advocate for Respondent : S.P. Sinha, ; Mohammad Hussain and ; S.S. Shukla, Advs. for re

J.C. Shah, J.1. By our judgment dated April 19, 1968, we passed the following order in this appeal:It will be declared that the deed of trust executed by Raja Bishwanath on August 29, 1932, did not...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 1996

Raj Kumar and ors. Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-01-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 364

Reported in : 63(1996)DLT934; 1996(38)DRJ711

Arun Kumar, J. (1) This judgment will dispose of three appeals of the three appellants. The appellants were charged and convicted under Sections 364/302/ 120B Ipc, for the murder of Deepak @ Babloo, aged about 10...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial